Offset PedalMarking

2018-09-05 Thread foxfanfare
Hi all, I'd like to move globally the pedal markings for piano to the left, but only the SustainOn sign, not the release one. If I write someting like \override SustainPedal.X-offset, they will both move. I wonder how it is possible to be done. I found in the configuration file how the sustainOn/

Accidentals and Ledger Lines

2018-09-05 Thread foxfanfare
Hi all, I find LilyPond default output for accidentals a bit weird with ledger lines. Here's a little exemple in a score context: accidentals.JPG As you can see, the ledger line of the note containing the accidental is shortned

Re: Offset PedalMarking

2018-09-05 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-09-05 01:53, foxfanfare wrote: I'd like to move globally the pedal markings for piano to the left, but only the SustainOn sign, not the release one. If I write someting like \override SustainPedal.X-offset, they will both move. I wonder how it is possible to be done. You might be abl

Re: Offset PedalMarking

2018-09-05 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 05.09.18 um 10:53 schrieb foxfanfare: I found in the configuration file how the sustainOn/Off works: sustainOn = #(make-span-event 'SustainEvent START) sustainOff = #(make-span-event 'SustainEvent STOP) I think it would be possible to add an offset for the sustainOn shortcut but I didn't

Re: Offset PedalMarking

2018-09-05 Thread foxfanfare
Malte Meyn-3 wrote > You can add a tweak to the definition of sustainOn: > > \version "2.19.82" > > sustainOn = > #(define-event-function () () > #{ > -\tweak X-offset 3 > -#(make-span-event 'SustainEvent START) > #}) > > { >b4\sustainOn 4 4 4 >b4\sustainOff 4 4 4 > }

LilyPond 2.19.82 and Fedora 28: exit code 6

2018-09-05 Thread Davide Liessi
Hi all. Compiling this file: \version "2.19.82" { c1 \tempo "a" %c1 } with the system-provided LilyPond 2.19.82 on Fedora 28 I get this error: lilypond 2.19.82 [Senza nome] in avvio... Elaborazione di «/tmp/frescobaldi-nw1vbdie/tmpe_aojklz/document.ly» Analisi... Interpretazione della musi

Re: Offset PedalMarking

2018-09-05 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Aaron and Malte, I have been looking for this concept for ages! Thanks Gents. Andrew On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 19:18, Aaron Hill wrote: > > You might be able to achieve this by adjusting both the > `parent-alignment-X` and `self-alignment-X` properties. See the > following: > > > \versio

Re: LilyPond 2.19.82 and Fedora 28: exit code 6

2018-09-05 Thread David Kastrup
Davide Liessi writes: > Hi all. > Compiling this file: > > \version "2.19.82" > { > c1 > \tempo "a" > %c1 > } > > with the system-provided LilyPond 2.19.82 on Fedora 28 I get this error: > > lilypond 2.19.82 [Senza nome] in avvio... > Elaborazione di «/tmp/frescobaldi-nw1vbdie/tmpe_aojklz/d

Re: LilyPond 2.19.82 and Fedora 28: exit code 6

2018-09-05 Thread Davide Liessi
2018-09-05 13:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > The \tempo does > not actually appear, though. Indeed. > So which architecture and GCC version are we talking about in your case? $ uname -a Linux dmif-lm2 4.17.18-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 22 19:08:07 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ gc

Re: how to whiteout an ottava bracket

2018-09-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 21.08.2018 19:13, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: As you can see, a stem whiteout would also affect staff and beam. This I have to correct: normally, one can always find an arrangement so that the whiteout affects exactly those parts you want it to. In this case: \version "2.19.82" rD = { \

Re: Lilypond website down?

2018-09-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 16.08.2018 23:37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Well, currently, it's coming out of the $300 new user credit that Google offers to new cloud users. $300 is enough to keep it running for a year or two. This sounds slightly dangerous and like we should search for a new solution rather sooner than

Re: Edition Engraver and staff changes

2018-09-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 15.08.2018 07:50, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: yes you are right, \change Staff cannot be used with the EE. Some time ago I tried to make it possible, but it results in a fatal crash of lilypond if the EE sends such an event. I add this to the issues. Maybe with a minimal example this should also

Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread Jogchum Reitsma
Hi, The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted not on the staff, but above it. Is there a possiblility in Lilypond to define that time? Simpy issuing "time 4/\breve" gives an error message in ve

Re: Accidentals and Ledger Lines

2018-09-05 Thread Malte Meyn
[Forwarding to bug-lilypond] Hi foxfanfare, Am 05.09.18 um 11:07 schrieb foxfanfare: As you can see, the ledger line of the note containing the accidental is shortned as expected, but the other aren't and you can see here the natural appears too close. that’s true, neighbouring ledger lines s

Re: Edition Engraver and staff changes

2018-09-05 Thread Urs Liska
Am 5. September 2018 14:27:06 MESZ schrieb Simon Albrecht : >On 15.08.2018 07:50, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: >> yes you are right, \change Staff cannot be used with the EE. Some >time >> ago I tried to make it possible, but it results in a fatal crash of >> lilypond if the EE sends such an event. I

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread David Kastrup
Jogchum Reitsma writes: > Hi, > > The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states > a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted > not on the staff, but above it. > > Is there a possiblility in Lilypond to define that time? Simpy issuing > "time 4/\

Re: Edition Engraver and staff changes

2018-09-05 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Am 05.09.2018 um 15:01 schrieb Urs Liska: > > > Am 5. September 2018 14:27:06 MESZ schrieb Simon Albrecht > : >> On 15.08.2018 07:50, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: >>> yes you are right, \change Staff cannot be used with the EE. Some >> time >>> ago I tried to make it possible, but it results in a fata

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
To elaborate a little on David’s response: On 05.09.2018 11:15, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted not on the staff, but above it. This would be replicated in LilyP

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 05.09.2018 11:15, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted not on the staff, but above it. PS. I’d like to just mention that Carl Orff’s music is under copyright worl

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 05.09.2018 11:15, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: >> The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana >> states a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that >> is noted not on the staff, but above it. > > PS. I’d like to just mention that Carl Or

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Simon, That's not illegal at all anywhere in the world just so that other list members don't get the wrong impression. Selling multiple copies, i.e., making a derivative work, without permission or licence from the copyright holder would be. Similar to photocopying of complete works for study p

Re: cadenza when having multiple staffs

2018-09-05 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know how it went. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:01 AM Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > My thoughts exactly. > > Andrew > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 15:55, Aaron Hill wrote: >> >> >> It is not a cadenza, per se, but rather an omissi

Re: cadenza when having multiple staffs

2018-09-05 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Actually, it didn't take me long to test it. It's spot on. Thanks! Will let you know when I upload it into its repo. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:18 PM Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know > how it went. > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:01

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hi Andrew and David, of course you are right, I misrepresented that and went too far – sorry. A reengraving is no different from a photocopy in that you cannot give it to anybody or use it for performing, regardless whether parts of that may not be enforcible. But you can do whatever you want i

Re: Edition Engraver and \markLengthOn

2018-09-05 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Jan-Peter, You were exactly right. For the score I had to use: \editionMod score 615 0/4 hallager.partI.Score \markLengthOn \editionMod score 622 3/4 hallager.partI.Score \markLengthOff But for an individual part: \editionMod parts 615 0/4 hallager.partI.fluteI.Staff \markLengthOn \editionMo