Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know how it went. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:01 AM Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > My thoughts exactly. > > Andrew > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 15:55, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote: >> >> >> It is not a cadenza, per se, but rather an omission of tuplet numbering. >> The piece seems to omit tuplet numbering in nearly all cases, rather >> relying solely on beaming groups to indicate the timing. >> > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
