Actually, it didn't take me long to test it. It's spot on. Thanks! Will let you know when I upload it into its repo. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:18 PM Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know > how it went. > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:01 AM Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > My thoughts exactly. > > > > Andrew > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 15:55, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> It is not a cadenza, per se, but rather an omission of tuplet numbering. > >> The piece seems to omit tuplet numbering in nearly all cases, rather > >> relying solely on beaming groups to indicate the timing. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-user mailing list > > lilypond-user@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
