Re: list of stencils

Hi Massimiliano, can you include some examples of your lilypond code? The list of symbols in lilypond http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/the-feta-font.en.html Normally I would create a line as a graphic: \markup { \draw-line #'(2 . 1)} See this page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1

Re: aligning \mark text

That's funny, I have no idea. It only seems to give the error with a \mark at the beginning of the score. Best, Edward -- Dr. Edward Neeman Adjunct Instructor, South Georgia State College Collaborative Pianist, Valdosta State University, Georgia Artist Faculty, ELMS Conservatory, Jaka

Re: list of stencils

Hi, at the moment I solved the problem with postscript as I couldn’t properly deal with the vertical lining of the note-glyph and the line of the markup (it seems to me difficult to move a markup over a staff). Here is what I did: dblacknote = { \once \override NoteHead.stencil = #ly:text-inte

Re: list of stencils

Thanks for clarifying! You'll want to look over here: https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond/blob/master/scm/stencil.scm That is not the most user-friendly place to search out stencils, admittedly! You can also try the \displayMusic and \displayScheme functions to see how lilypond is processing you

Fermata below text

(Posted via nabble. Tried to send direct but it did not show in the mailing list.) This is driving me nuts. Is it possible to get a fermata closer to the stave than markup? I've tried over-riding Script.outside-staff-priority, TextScript.outside-staff-priority and various horizontal and verti

Re: list of stencils

Thank you very much! With time I’ll be able to get the details of it. In the meanwhile I can use it… and go on studying! Best! massimiliano > On 4 Dec 2017, at 19:21, Edward Neeman wrote: > > Thanks for clarifying! > > You'll want to look over here: > https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond/blo

Re: Fermata below text

Am 04.12.2017 um 19:34 schrieb Phil Holmes: I've tried over-riding Script.outside-staff-priority Are you sure? Setting it to something < 450 works for me in 2.18.2 and 2.19.80. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gn

Re: Fermata below text

On 12/4/2017 1:34 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: (Posted via nabble. Tried to send direct but it did not show in the mailing list.) This is driving me nuts. Is it possible to get a fermata closer to the stave than markup? I've tried over-riding Script.outside-staff-priority, TextScript.outside-staff-

Re: Fermata below text

Thanks for the replies. I'd been using TextScript outside-staff-priority with no success. Not sure why script works, but it's solved my problem. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Ben To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 6:53 PM Subject: Re: Fe

Re: Fermata below text

Hi Phil, > I'd been using TextScript outside-staff-priority with no success. Not sure > why script works … because a fermata is a Script, not a TextScript? =) Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenm

Re: Strange end-of-line slur fragment (LilyPond 2.18)

Hi Urs, looks like . Best, Simon On 04.12.2017 11:56, Urs Liska wrote: Hi all, I'm entering a piece which has to be rendered with LilyPond 2.18, and I'm experiencing something strange with a broken tie/slur combination. The code is:

Re: Spacing issues with Mark_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver in Dynamics context

Saul, On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Saul Tobin wrote: > I'm less concerned by bad page breaks than I am by inconsistent system > spacing caused by bad extent-estimates. > Well, the main thing you describe as being a problem, and the control you are looking for: My problem is, that lilypond

Re: Strange end-of-line slur fragment (LilyPond 2.18)

Am 04.12.2017 um 22:29 schrieb Simon Albrecht: Hi Urs, looks like . Indeed - see the attachment with context ... Thanks Urs Best, Simon On 04.12.2017 11:56, Urs Liska wrote: Hi all, I'm entering a piece which has to be rendered w

Re: list of stencils

HI Massimiliano, I have written a very nice slash function that covers many cases and placed it in the openlilylib repository. Do take a look at it. No point re-inventing that wheel! Openlilylib is a project for things that probably should be in the baseline lilypond but for various reasons are n

Re: aligning \mark text

hello edward (& list), > \override Score.RehearsalMark.padding = #5 that works perfectly! many thanks. for the archives, this pushes the marks that would be placed within #n (which can be fractional and is in line spaces) to lie at #n, but leaves marks that lie beyond #n in place is there a

Re: aligning \mark text

hello again someone mentioned off-list that i should send a minimal example, apologies so: \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" c1 \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" g'1 \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" a,1 } the three boxes are all at different heights i'm hoping t

Re: aligning \mark text

ps. actually, two more things 1. looking at the whole score, perhaps what i really would like is a way to stop the marks near the staff moving around, perhaps by setting a minimum distance they can approach, while allowing very distant marks to still float, ie. the last mark in \version "2.18.2"

Re: aligning \mark text

pps. thanks so much for lilypond! it's very very excellent! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Strange end-of-line slur fragment (LilyPond 2.18)

Hi all, I'm entering a piece which has to be rendered with LilyPond 2.18, and I'm experiencing something strange with a broken tie/slur combination. The code is:     r8 f, as c f as c f (     % (line break is here)     f4 And the result is the attached one. The slur fragment before the line

RE: Strange end-of-line slur fragment (LilyPond 2.18)

Urs, Not sure if it is the cause, a closing parenthesis is missing after the f4. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Urs Liska Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 2:57 AM To: lilypond-user Subject: Strange end

Another Timing error?

I'm expecting the score so far to be within one meter. I'm using threes over four. It does prefer when I put 3 over two, but I'm sure two is too long a duration surly for what I need here? [code] \version "2.19.80" upper = \relative c'' { \clef treble \time 5/4 \slurUp des,4( \pp\< % 1s

Re: aligning \mark text

I'm guessing that staff-padding doesn't work because the Mark_engraver is part of the Score context, not the Staff context. What about this? \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \override Score.RehearsalMark.padding = #5 \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" c1 \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" g'1 \ma

Re: aligning \mark text

Here's an alternative solution that puts the marks in their own dynamic context, keeping them vertically aligned: \version "2.18.2" << \new Dynamics \with { \consists Mark_engraver } { \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1 \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1 \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1 \ma

list of stencils

Hi everybody, I’m a newbie but already with a, at least for me, not elementary problem. I want to realise a note head with the original note glyph plus a slash on hte note. I’ve seen a couple of way to do it: one by overriding the note head stencil with a lambda function and another one by using

Re: Another Timing error?

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/writing-rhythms use 3/2 instead of 3/4? Regards Am 04.12.2017 15:16, schrieb Vivyan: I'm expecting the score so far to be within one meter. I'm using threes over four. It does prefer when I put 3 over two, but I'm sure two is too long a du

Re: Another Timing error?

In "lower" you have 4 quarter rests an eighth rest and a quarter note, makes 5 quarters and an eighths. Should produce an error message? Might be an error? I am not an expert. Am 04.12.2017 15:16, schrieb Vivyan: I'm expecting the score so far to be within one meter. I'm using threes over four

Re: aligning \mark text

On 12/4/2017 9:23 AM, Edward Neeman wrote: Here's an alternative solution that puts the marks in their own dynamic context, keeping them vertically aligned: \version "2.18.2" << \new Dynamics \with { \consists Mark_engraver } { \mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1 \mark \markup \rounded-box "