Hi Simon,
> it’s a known issue that alignment of barlines can be difficult in such cases.
> I think we have a tracker issue, and it’s a non-trivial question how such
> barlines should be aligned by default.
So it is a know issue, that it is all i needed to know. Harm did find something
in the
Hi all,
may I ask how the 'id property defined in grob-interface is actually used?
I can assign it a value using
{
c'
\once \override NoteHead.id = "Hi, I'm an ID"
d' e'
}
and it will show up properly in the resulting SVF file. But is that
property actually used somewhere already or it is
Hi
It seems that \pageBreak is not honored by Lilypond.
I found an old post [1] that seems to state that it is needed to enclose
each portion in a different \book block (?).
Can anybody confirm? Or explain the better way to force page break from
within a .ly file, to happen in the lilypond-bo
Am 15. Mai 2016 17:18:10 GMT+01:00, schrieb Paul :
>On 05/15/2016 09:01 AM, David Wright wrote:
>> On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote:
>>> Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to
>output the result ?
>Maybe \displayLilyMusic would be usef
On 5/15/16 4:24 PM, "Ryan Michael" wrote:
>please confer with this Schoenberg op 30 engraving, where the "rit ...
>Tempo" are designed in the way I am trying to achieve.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AidU-4YF03Y
It looks to me like all they have done in that engraving is make the
TextSpanne
Hi Dave,
>> For example: a1:32 would give 4 ledger lines but it's hard to tell
>> that there are 4 ledger lines because the tremolo covers it.
> And make them lighter.
The a has one octave more ledger lines. You can try this and adjust
the values:
{
\override StemTremolo.Y-offset = 3
- Original Message -
From: "Alberto Simões"
To: "lilypond"
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 3:34 PM
Subject: Page Break in Lilypond-book
Hi
It seems that \pageBreak is not honored by Lilypond.
I found an old post [1] that seems to state that it is needed to enclose
each portion in a di
On Sat 14 May 2016 at 15:34:30 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
> It seems that \pageBreak is not honored by Lilypond.
> I found an old post [1] that seems to state that it is needed to
> enclose each portion in a different \book block (?).
>
> Can anybody confirm? Or explain the better way to force
Hi,
my mails do not reach lilypond-user. Does that only happen to me or is it a
general problem? I have written 4 mails in the last week an none appeared on
the list. Is there something I can do?
Best,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-use
On 5/15/16 7:12 PM, "Ryan Michael" wrote:
>great! Thanks Carl. Question, you have dots, I have the dashed line. When
>I try:
>%
>\override TextSpanner.style = #'dotted-line
> \override TextSpanner.dash-fraction = 0
>\override TextSpanner.dash-period = 5
>\override TextSpanner.t
At 21:03 15/05/2016 +, Joram Noname wrote:
my mails do not reach lilypond-user. Does that only happen to me ...
No, it's often happened to me too.
... or is it a general problem? Is there something I can do?
There ought to be - but sadly it seems no-one is prepared to investigate.
I wo
Just wait. I sent one on 14th, and got it delivered today :)
On 15/05/16 22:03, Joram wrote:
Hi,
my mails do not reach lilypond-user. Does that only happen to me or is it a
general problem? I have written 4 mails in the last week an none appeared on
the list. Is there something I can do?
Best,
On 5/15/16 4:18 PM, "Ryan Michael" wrote:
>Hello I am trying to go for a classic textSpan look, by using essentially
>a period '.' quite large and bold.
>as the in lieu of the 'dashed-line, line style. Is there a way I can do
>this?
Ryan,
I can find no way of doing it with the current LilyPo
On 16/05/16 18:50, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 14 May 2016 at 15:34:30 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
> It seems that \pageBreak is not honored by Lilypond.
> I found an old post [1] that seems to state that it is needed to
> enclose each portion in a different \book block (?).
>
> Can anybody
Dave Higgins noted that for notes outside of the staff, tremolo
indications collided with ledger lines.
In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond that go
against Gould's recommendations.
1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a
crotchet note head
>> For example: a1:32 would give 4 ledger lines but it's hard to tell
>> that there are 4 ledger lines because the tremolo covers it.
>>
>> What's the syntax to lower the tremolo?
>
> \override Beam.positions = #'(0 . 1)
>
> Change the 0 and 1 to suit
>
> Trevor
Only if you are talking ab
Dave Higgins noted that for notes outside of the staff, tremolo
indications collided with ledger lines.
In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond that go
against Gould's recommendations.
1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a
crotchet note head
On 5/15/16 1:20 PM, "Carl-Henrik Buschmann" wrote:
>Those lines at the end of the system should be perfect in line with
>the ends of the staff, should they not? I have not seen it in print
>before,
>have anybody else?
>PS.
>After
>that speech about not giving a compatible example -which is n
On 5/15/16 8:50 PM, "Andrew Bernard" wrote:
>Hi Ryan,
>
>Yes, at 2.19.41 specifying dotted-line style for text spanners just uses
>tiny dashes that look a bit like dots, and you can¹t make them larger.
Actually, you can make them larger with the TextSpanner.thickness
parameter, but they'll sti
Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, but
in LilyPond they are the same thickness).
IMO your variant isn’t much better: The tremolo beams look *very* slim
now. Two ideas:
1. Does Gould say something about *how muc
Hi Simon,
> it’s a known issue that alignment of barlines can be difficult in such cases.
> I think we have a tracker issue, and it’s a non-trivial question how such
> barlines should be aligned by default.
So it is a know issue, that it is all i needed to know. Harm did find something
in the
Am 16.05.2016 um 21:20 schrieb Malte Meyn:
IMO your variant isn’t much better:
I should have first thanked you to work on this topic at all (and your
changes 1 and 3 are indeed worth to be included into LilyPond; 2 with
some further changes, I have no opinion on 4 but these thoughts let me
I’m trying to typeset a very simple piano and violin arrangement and while
doing the piano part I wanted to have the violin staff «cue sized» as a
reference to the pianist. I used \magnifyStaff and while it works wonders, it
gives me this at the end of each system:
http://i.imgur.com/6UNkJkA.pn
Hi,
I was also wondering where the problem is in the given example. Precise
questions help to get answers.
Am 15.05.2016 um 21:20 schrieb Carl-Henrik Buschmann:
> Those lines at the end of the system should be perfect in line with the
> ends of the staff, should they not? I have not seen it in pr
Hi all,
I need to set a document containing one or more Rezitationstöne[1] (I
don't know if there is a correct english translation). The score looks
like my hand drawn score at [2]. I came up with the following file to
set this kind of music:
\version "2.19.37"
\score{
{
\key g \major
\
> In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond
> that go against Gould's recommendations.
>
> 1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a
>crotchet note head).
This is a matter of taste, it seems. I have seen scores where the
width of tremolos is
On 5/16/16 1:20 PM, "Malte Meyn" wrote:
>
>Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> 2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams,
>>but
>> in LilyPond they are the same thickness).
>
>IMO your variant isn¹t much better: The tremolo beams look *very* slim
>now. T
Am 12.05.2016 um 22:45 schrieb Dave Higgins:
> That doesn't appear to move the tremolo in any direction. Tried (5 . 5).
My previous mail did not come through (yet?), so I try once again:
Only if you are talking about \repeat tremolos with two notes this
works. For the example above (one note,
Hi Carl,
bringing this up and already offering a solution is really nice. Thank
you for your work!
I can only tell what my gut feeling is:
1) I like the wider tremolos more for whole notes
2) Again, I like the thick lines more
3) The tremolos inside the staff look much cleaner/better.
4) Can/
2016-05-16 22:52 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen :
>
>
> On 5/16/16 1:20 PM, "Malte Meyn" wrote:
>
>>
>>Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>>> 2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams,
>>>but
>>> in LilyPond they are the same thickness).
>>
>>IMO your variant isn¹t
Copying to the list, from an off-list conversation.
Which I started since I wasn't sure I was saying anything useful.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Gianmaria Lari
wrote:
> Ciao David, you wrote:
>
> > Great news! I'll have to look into that since I'm not familiar with
> > groupTag.
>
> If yo
31 matches
Mail list logo
