2016-05-16 22:52 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: > > > On 5/16/16 1:20 PM, "Malte Meyn" <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote: > >> >>Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >>> 2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, >>>but >>> in LilyPond they are the same thickness). >> >>IMO your variant isn¹t much better: The tremolo beams look *very* slim >>now. Two ideas: >>1. Does Gould say something about *how much* thinner they should be? >>2. Shouldn¹t the space between the beams be reduced at the same or at >>least similar amount? > > Lilypond beams are 0.48 staff spaces by default, which is half of the > space between staff lines. > > In the code I produced I reduced the thickness by about 25%, to 0.4 staff > spaces. Harm had suggested even thinner lines, at 0.35 staff spaces.
Tbh, I took 0,35 to make it obvious to everyone (and added "change to fit your needs" or something like that). That said, I _do_ like your changes, although I think I've seen a broad variety in printed editions. Thanks for doing this, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
