Log output

In the output log for lilypond compilation, we see something like this: Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64] What do the numbers refer to? In my score there is no relation to pages or lines or similar. I am asking in as this may be a guide to where the numerous crashes I am seei

LilyPond initiative in french conservatoires in Paris

Hello, My friend and colleague Aymeric OLIVAUD and I, would like to share the result of our (ongoing) work focused on LilyPond. We are two french music teachers in Paris and we imagined a form of public workshop/keynote event with young students where we'd try to show and explain what is Lily

Linnstrument tablature

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > Without trying to really understand the implications I would ask you: Is > there a way to indicate that kind of two-dimensionality *in notation* > and, if so, how? > If you have an answer to that it will be easier to consider a LilyPond > implem

Re: Log output

Quoting Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com): > In the output log for lilypond compilation, we see something like this: > > Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64] > > What do the numbers refer to? In my score there is no relation to pages or > lines or similar. I am asking in

Linnstrument tablature

Marc Hohl mailto:m...@hohlart.de>> wrote: Am 28.10.2015 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Ellis: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Marc Hohl > wrote: > > Wow, looks like a futuristic Chapman stick ;-) > > > Yes, it's been on the market less than a year. Mine, which came 2 > we

Re: Linnstrument tablature

Sounds interesting. Which midi synth do you use with it? Regards On 28.10.2015 15:51, Michael Ellis wrote: Marc Hohl mailto:m...@hohlart.de> >> wrote: Am 28.10.2015 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Ellis: On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Marc Hohl

Re: Linnstrument tablature

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM BB wrote: > Sounds interesting. Which midi synth do you use with it? > > I'm using Logic Pro X. It supports Channel Per Note MIDI which is needed for polyphonically varying control messages. A list of recommended sound generators is maintained at http://www.roge

giant font size doesn't increase stem size

Hey all, If I do something like \once \set fontSize = #10 d8 I get a gigantic flag and note but no (visible) change in the stem. Is there a command that will get the stem bigger too? I’m on the latest dev version. Thanks! Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-u

Re: giant font size doesn't increase stem size

Hi Mike, Try : \tweak Stem.length #20 d8 Cheers, Pierre 2015-10-28 17:02 GMT+01:00 Mike Solomon : > Hey all, > > If I do something like > > \once \set fontSize = #10 d8 > > I get a gigantic flag and note but no (visible) change in the stem. Is > there a command that will get the stem bigger to

Re: LilyPond initiative in french conservatoires in Paris

Hi Mathieu, Very nice, congrats. I tried to do such a presentation last year in another Parisian music conservatory without success (for some reason, the director didn't want it). Cheers, Pierre 2015-10-28 12:05 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Demange : > Hello, > > My friend and colleague Aymeric OLIVAUD an

Re: Linnstrument tablature

Michael Ellis writes: > The problem I alluded to in my previous post is that you might well > want to play the half-note chord in measure 3 on row 5 as 2 > (frets 16,20), but LP doesn't seem to support that yet. It seems to me that the main problem is that paper doesn't support it either. Care

Re: Log output

Andrew Bernard writes: > In the output log for lilypond compilation, we see something like this: > > Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64] > > What do the numbers refer to? In my score there is no relation to > pages or lines or similar. I am asking in as this may be a guide to > w

Re: Linnstrument tablature

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:11 PM David Kastrup wrote: > Michael Ellis writes: > > > The problem I alluded to in my previous post is that you might well > > want to play the half-note chord in measure 3 on row 5 as 2 > > (frets 16,20), but LP doesn't seem to support that yet. > > It seems to me th

Re: New Staff doesn't go away after end symbol

Am 28.10.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Ryan Michael: The following is the snippet that happens *within *my single voice cello score. \new Staff << \new Voice = "first" { \voiceOne \clef treble aes8 ges8 16 16 d16 g\harmonic\f r16 aes16 } \new Voice= "second" { \voiceTwo \clef bass

Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

Hello, I have a multi-part band score in Sibelius 7 that I have been trying to convert to LilyPond format. (No, not the original Sibelius 7 for RISC OS, but rather the newer Sibelius 7.1.3.77 for Microsoft Windows.) I have exported it into the MusicXML exchange format and attempted to use the Mus

Re: New Staff doesn't go away after end symbol

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 28.10.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Ryan Michael: > >> The following is the snippet that happens *within *my single voice cello >> score. >> >> \new Staff << >>\new Voice = "first" >> { \voiceOne \clef treble >> aes8 ges8 16 16 d16

Re: New Staff doesn't go away after end symbol

Hi, perhaps there are better options, but how about adding \stopStaff after the last notes in this staff: > \new Voice= "second" > { \voiceTwo \clef bass \tuplet 3/2{ r4 r4 } r8 eih8 r16 > \xNote 16 \stopStaff > } >>> >> > %{ > At this point I want the new staff to dissapear > > %} C

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

Hello Thomas, I’ve done this sometimes on Mac OS X. If you can send me the .sib file, I can give it a try. JM > Le 28 oct. 2015 à 21:24, Thomas WillNot <1137...@acadiau.ca> a écrit : > > Hello, > > I have a multi-part band score in Sibelius 7 that I have been trying to > convert to LilyPond f

Re: New Staff doesn't go away after end symbol

Am 28.10.2015 um 21:26 schrieb Ryan Michael: On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Malte Meyn wrote: Am 28.10.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Ryan Michael: The following is the snippet that happens *within *my single voice cello score. \new Staff << \new Voice = "first" { \voiceOne \clef tr

Re: New Staff doesn't go away after end symbol

Thank you. This is almost 100% what I was trying to achieve. The only thing that remains, if possible, is to remove the printing of the additional clef symbol below the now solo staff with staff lines. The stop staff stops printing the staff lines of the new staff, however the score still engraves

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

Hello Thomas, On 28.10.2015 21:24, Thomas WillNot wrote: attempted to use the MusicXML2LY program supplied with LilyPond with no luck. MusicXML2ly is known to be unreliable and lack maintenance. It also adds staccato and other markings with "-\staccato" or "-\markup" - I don't know the purpo

\stopStaff bug? [was: Re: New Staff doesn't go away after end symbol]

I know this problem, IMO it’s a bug. You can work around by putting spacer rests after the \stopStaff until the next barline occurs. In your case s16*10 if I counted correctly. Am 28.10.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Ryan Michael: Thank you. This is almost 100% what I was trying to achieve. The only th

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

[using Sibelius 7.1.3.77 for Microsoft Windows] > > I have exported it into the MusicXML exchange format and attempted to use > the MusicXML2LY program supplied with LilyPond with no luck. > It will read the XML file but then spit out a bunch of complaints, but no > LilyPond file is produced! I h

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

Hello Thomas, No luck: - exporting from Sibelius 7.1.3 to MusicXML produces a file, but music2xml crashes on it; - save after importing those exports into Finale 2014 and re-exporting as MusicXML. See below what I get. Things always end with: raise "More than 1 child

Gregorian notation - augmentum problem

Hi, I know that the support for Gregorian chant is not the best. But does anybody know how to solve this: If I add an \augmentum, the line breaks at this point and the former part is stretched to fill the line. Can I avoid this? Here is a small example: \include "gregorian.ly" #(set-global-staff

\fill-with-pattern does not center when line-width is overridden?

Hello LilyPonders I want to reduce the distance between the tocItem text and its page number while keeping the list *centered on the page*. I tried the following but the list is left-aligned: \version "2.19.29" \paper { tocItemMarkup = \markup \large \column { \override #'(line-width . 80

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

Just a thought: You might have some luck feeding the Sibelius XML to music21 http://web.mit.edu/music21/doc/systemReference/faq.html and then re-writing the XML file to feed to musicxml2ly. Music21 is open source, fairly powerful, and somewhat Lilypond aware. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:25 PM Jacqu

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

Hi Everyone, Thanks for all your ideas! Jacques, I appreciate you trying conversion in Mac OSX, though it looks like you got the same result as me with those error messages complaining about having too many children or something. I don't think anything's wrong with my Sibelius files, but maybe Si

Re: LilyPond initiative in french conservatoires in Paris

Hi, Maybe the private music school (imep, atla...) could be sensitive to this presentation. I was an imep student, and there was a lot of home work about arrangement, so the teacher made a course on Finale... Le mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 18:38, Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>

Re: \fill-with-pattern does not center when line-width is overridden?

2015-10-28 23:41 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni : > Hello LilyPonders > > I want to reduce the distance between the tocItem text and its page number > while keeping the list *centered on the page*. > I tried the following but the list is left-aligned: > > > \version "2.19.29" \paper { tocItemMarkup =

Re: \fill-with-pattern does not center when line-width is overridden?

Il giorno gio 29 ott 2015 alle 0:38, Thomas Morley ha scritto: tocItemMarkup = \markup \large \fill-line { %% < \override #'(line-width . 80) \fill-with-pattern #1 #CENTER . \fromproperty #'toc:text \fromproperty #'toc:page } Ah ok, \fill-

Re: Log output

Please refer to lilypond bug mailing list. On 29 Oct 2015, at 06:12, David Kastrup wrote: What is the output with those crashes? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Log output

Well, I have 493 bars in the section, and lilypond log output only counts up to [64]. That does not seem to be commensurate with the indications being bar numbers. Andrew On 29 Oct 2015, at 01:32, David Wright wrote: Bar numbers AFAICT. ___ lilypo

editors

Among the recent threads that nearly touched off another editor war, I wanted to mention that I've recently switched from using emacs to sublime text. (Although I still use emacs for complicated macros.) I was happy to find this sublime text package for Lilypond, and wanted to let others know abo

Re: Log output

On 29/10/2015 11:10, Andrew Bernard wrote: Well, I have 493 bars in the section, and lilypond log output only counts up to [64]. That does not seem to be commensurate with the indications being bar numbers. They've always behaved as bar number indications for me. I'm working on a piece with

Re: Log output

On Thu 29 Oct 2015 at 11:10:49 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: > Well, I have 493 bars in the section, and lilypond log output only counts up > to [64]. That does not seem to be commensurate with the indications being bar > numbers. > > Andrew > > On 29 Oct 2015, at 01:32, David Wright wrote: >

Re: Gregorian notation - augmentum problem

> If I add an \augmentum, the line breaks at this point and the former > part is stretched to fill the line. Can I avoid this? > Here is a small example: > > \include "gregorian.ly" > #(set-global-staff-size 40) > > music = { > \repeat unfold 20 a > % \augmentum > b > \repeat unfold 20 a

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:23:19 + (UTC) Thomas WillNot <1137...@acadiau.ca> wrote: > I think the easiest for me will be just using Denemo since it seems to > work I usually get good results with musescore (mscore) MusicXML import. Unfortuantely they dropped LilyPond export in the new version :(