Hi Daniel,
That's another assertion failure on top of the one I have been reporting in
2.19.21. Can you please submit a bug report, given you have an example that
produces the error?
Something seems to be a bit broken in 2.19.21 compared to 2.19.20.Iif I had
the knowledge, I would jump in and fi
"Andrew Bernard" writes:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> That's another assertion failure on top of the one I have been reporting in
> 2.19.21. Can you please submit a bug report, given you have an example that
> produces the error?
>
> Something seems to be a bit broken in 2.19.21 compared to 2.19.20.Iif I ha
Hi David,
The one I have reported dumps core. So pretty much a fatal error. But it is
good to know the program behaviour has been altered and that accounts for why
we are suddenly seeing assertion failures when they occur.
Andrew
On 13/06/2015 18:04, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>"Andrew Berna
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Hi David,
>
> The one I have reported dumps core. So pretty much a fatal error.
Assertion failures always dump core. The idea is that they dump core at
a point of time where one is still reasonably close to the problem
rather than at some arbitrary point later.
A core
On 12 Jun 2015, at 14:57, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Hello Damian,
>
> Am 12.06.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Damian leGassick:
>> \version "2.18.2"
>>
>>
>> {
>> \time 3/4
>> r4 \repeat tremolo 4 { e'''!64 c'''! } r4.
>> r4 \repeat tremolo 8 { e'''!64 c'''! } r4
>> }
> You might be interested in \
Am 13.06.2015 um 11:59 schrieb Damian leGassick:
I do know about the accidental style - I'm revising a file that I started back
in 2007 (when I was just starting with Lilypond)
And in the EU, Webern will enter public domain on 1st January 2016 :-)
Best regards, Simon
_
Hi Gianmaria,
> Does people really use this features? I mean does it happen
> frequently people set '\!' in a certain location expecting Lilypond render
> it at the bar line immediately preceding if the note which ends a hairpin
> falls on a downbeat?
Yes. I would estimate that 95% of the time, I
Am 13.06.2015 um 02:57 schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht writes:
Hello,
I need help with the attached situation: the "dim." should go inside
the slur, but the avoid-slur tweak is ignored and it appears
above. How to fix that?
Thanks in advance,
Simon
I have no idea what I'm doing here a
Simon Albrecht wrote Saturday, June 13, 2015 2:00 PM
> Weird, but it works and is definitely preferable over extra-offset.
> Does anybody have an explanation? I couldn’t find the table with default
> values for outside-staff-priority. They don’t seem to be referenced in
> the IR, are they?
Try
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Am 13.06.2015 um 11:59 schrieb Damian leGassick:
>> I do know about the accidental style - I'm revising a file that I
> started back in 2007 (when I was just starting with Lilypond)
> And in the EU, Webern will enter public domain on 1st January 2016 :-)
Unless some ter
Hello LilyPonders,
I have a piece where I want the lower right-hand voice to be shifted left
whenever the chord is too crowded, but instead the default is for it to be
shifted right. The snippet below shows how I could use force-hshift on the
notes I want shifted; the second measure is the defaul
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 5:23 AM
> To: Andrew Bernard
> Cc: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: "Assertion failed!"
>
> Andrew Bernard writes:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > The one I have reported dumps core
Daniel Rosen writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 5:23 AM
>> To: Andrew Bernard
>> Cc: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: "Assertion failed!"
>>
>> Andrew Bernard writes:
>>
>> > Hi David,
>> >
>> >
On 2015-06-13 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Daniel Rosen writes:
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 5:23 AM
To: Andrew Bernard
Cc: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: "Assertion failed!"
Andrew Bernard writes:
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bernard [mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:49 AM
> To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: RE: "Assertion failed!"
>
> Can you see if this works in 2.19.20? [Based on my hypothesis that 2.19.21
> has regressed
Hi guys..
The other day i was trying to practice jazz improvisation on linux.
I was searching for a simple/fast working software that would help me
practice.
I found about MMA and it is cool - text based, midi output/export
but
it wasn't so clean regarding "musicly writing" speaking.
So i had thi
2015-06-13 21:07 GMT+02:00 Stjepan Horvat :
> Hi guys..
> The other day i was trying to practice jazz improvisation on linux.
> I was searching for a simple/fast working software that would help me
> practice.
> I found about MMA and it is cool - text based, midi output/export
Well, google-search
Am 13.06.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Simon Albrecht wrote Saturday, June 13, 2015 2:00 PM
Weird, but it works and is definitely preferable over extra-offset.
Does anybody have an explanation? I couldn’t find the table with default
values for outside-staff-priority. They don’t seem to
Am 13.06.2015 um 15:50 schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht writes:
Am 13.06.2015 um 11:59 schrieb Damian leGassick:
I do know about the accidental style - I'm revising a file that I
started back in 2007 (when I was just starting with Lilypond)
And in the EU, Webern will enter public domain
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Have a link?
http://www.mellowood.ca/mma/
A quote from that website:
If you are confused by the acronym "MMA" and were looking for the the MIDI
Manufacturers Association (MMA) please visit http://www.midi.org. On the
other hand, if you were
At 21:58 13/06/2015 +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
A quote from that website [http://www.mellowood.ca/mma/]:
And, please remember, our program is called "MMA - Musical MIDI
Accompaniement", not "MMA".
So its full name would be "Musical Musical Instrument Digital
Interface Accompaniment - Mu
Simon Albrecht wrote Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:53 PM
> Am 13.06.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>
>> Simon Albrecht wrote Saturday, June 13, 2015 2:00 PM
>>
>>> Weird, but it works and is definitely preferable over extra-offset.
>>> Does anybody have an explanation? I couldn’t find the tabl
Hello Trevor,
I stand corrected. And thanks for spelling out that explanation :-) I
haven’t been thorough enough looking it up myself – or rather
overestimated my knowledge of the docs, which is unfortunate after some
four years of learning. Sigh… On the other hand: I have rarely, if ever,
co
First, I'm not a politician and I'm not here to win a war :) My suggestion is
just a suggestion that have to be analyzed and in case it brings more
benefits than disavantages it should be considered; if an expert explains me
it is not advantageous I will not cry and I will be glad having learnt
som
Am 14.06.2015 um 01:29 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
First, I'm not a politician and I'm not here to win a war :) My suggestion is
just a suggestion that have to be analyzed and in case it brings more
benefits than disavantages it should be considered; if an expert explains me
it is not advantageous I
Hi Gianmaria,
> Could you please confirm me that in music language this means crescendo
> ends on 'f4.' (d8' has the lower intensity and 'f4' the higher)
The second part of your statement is correct: the notation implies that d
should have a lower intensity/volume, and the f a higher intensity/v
Colin Campbell shaw.ca> writes:
> Under the assumption that the changed assertion handling is exposing
> previously non-fatal bugs, I propose to create separate issues for the 3
> items now known: Daniel's two and another reported by Andrew Barnard.
Colin would you let met add the three issu
On 2015-06-13 07:54 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
Colin Campbell shaw.ca> writes:
Under the assumption that the changed assertion handling is exposing
previously non-fatal bugs, I propose to create separate issues for the 3
items now known: Daniel's two and another reported by Andrew Barnard.
Colin
28 matches
Mail list logo
