Am 21.05.2014 07:41, schrieb Carlo Vanoni:
@Urs Liska
Your code did the trick, thanks.
Glad it helped.
I just want to stress that it's not my code. See
%{
Engraver that suppresses the printing of a
time signature if it is the same that is
currently in effect.
Author: David Nalesni
Hi,
for analysis purposes I'd like to draw (e.g.) boxes around objects on
different staves (see attachment).
Is there a straightforward and particularly robust way to do that with
LilyPond itself (the image was postprocessed)?
Thanks for any hint
Urs
__
super thanks Jan-Peter, I did not even know about \cueDuring !
regards Paul
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I suspect, there is something wrong with spacer rests. At least this
> snippet works:
>
>
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
>
> \addQuote
I can see your point. I recently was transcribing a piece where the time
signature changed regularly. If I were breaking that piece into different
parts, then putting them together in a song section, I would want
"adjacent" time signatures that were the same to not reprint.
Thanks for bringing u
Thank You!
I used a filled-box and played around with the layers to partially cover the
beam, but not other grobs.
I'm stuck figuring out how to avoid the box covering staff lines.
Here's the layer assignments I have:
\override Beam.layer = #0
\override Stem.layer = #3
\override Accidenta
I have a publisher interested in some of my work, but they want it in their
house style. They know about LilyPond, but it's "a fringe market they are
watching" (their words). Their preference would be for me to submit in
Finale or Sibelius, but I'm not interested in re-entering the entire
score.
There is some work on it going on (in the context of Frescobaldi development),
but you can't currently hope for a working solution.
I'm quite sad about that too.
Best
Urs
On 21. Mai 2014 18:44:16 MESZ, Dennis Clason wrote:
>I have a publisher interested in some of my work, but they want it in
>
On 21.05.2014, at 18:44, Dennis Clason wrote:
> I have a publisher interested in some of my work, but they want it in their
> house style. They know about LilyPond, but it's "a fringe market they are
> watching" (their words). Their preference would be for me to submit in
> Finale or Sibeli
I was under the impression MuseScore had Lilypond import and XML export
On May 21, 2014, at 2:18 PM, pls wrote:
>
> On 21.05.2014, at 18:44, Dennis Clason wrote:
>
>> I have a publisher interested in some of my work, but they want it in their
>> house style. They know about LilyPond, but
On 21.05.2014, at 21:19, Alex Loomis wrote:
> I was under the impression MuseScore had Lilypond import and XML export
IIRC MuseScore v0.9.5 had a very basic and experimental LilyPond import
function but they dropped it. They will also drop their LilyPond export
function in the upcoming version
I'm trying to get a decrescendo to piano that starts with the dynamic
"ffsf" which I create with markup, so like this code (except it doesn't
work):
\version "2.18.2"
ffsf = \markup { \dynamic "ff" \dynamic "sf" }
\relative c' {
c4 _\ffsf \> c c c | c c c c \p
}
I read about creating a cresce
Hello Dennis,
I use Photo Score Ultimate (which I bought as part of a Sibelius bundle) to
scan PDFs and sheet music, it’s worth its price in my opinion.
This allows exports as MusicXML. Never tried it this way though, since I first
export to Sibelius to fine tune the score before obtaining Musi
Andreas Stenberg wrote:
> Is there any easy way in version 2.18.2 to get a custos at
> the end of the (visible) notation in mensural or petrucci
> voice context?
I haven't checked 2.18.2, but this works in 2.19.5. It's a
total hack, but play around with it; it might ease your
situation.
Hope it
2014-05-21 22:22 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum :
> I'm trying to get a decrescendo to piano that starts with the dynamic "ffsf"
> which I create with markup, so like this code (except it doesn't work):
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> ffsf = \markup { \dynamic "ff" \dynamic "sf" }
>
> \relative c' {
> c4 _\ff
Thanks to all who replied. I have a couple of friends who have Sibelius and
PhotoScore, so I guess I will look into that as a work-around.
I was thinking about switching to MuSEScore, but if it won’t export to LP …
Again, thanks to all for the assistance.
Dennis
==
Dennis Clason
dennis.cla...
2014-05-21 11:24 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
> for analysis purposes I'd like to draw (e.g.) boxes around objects on
> different staves (see attachment).
> Is there a straightforward and particularly robust way to do that with
> LilyPond itself (the image was postprocessed)?
>
>
Hi Urs,
I have nothing
Am 21.05.2014 11:24, schrieb Urs Liska:
Hi,
for analysis purposes I'd like to draw (e.g.) boxes around objects on
different staves (see attachment).
Is there a straightforward and particularly robust way to do that with
LilyPond itself (the image was postprocessed)?
Hello Urs,
sorry for not
Thanks, that's it!
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2014-05-21 22:22 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum :
> > I'm trying to get a decrescendo to piano that starts with the dynamic
> "ffsf"
> > which I create with markup, so like this code (except it doesn'
Phil B.,
A raised space didn't work. I replaced the space with a character to see where
it goes. The raised markup heads right into the above staff without adding to
the skyline or separating the staves.
Javier
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:10 AM, Phil Burfitt wrote:
>
>
>- Original Messag
Ok for all, here is my initial testing of said app. I wrote up a very rough
usability document that expresses my concirns with the app. It can be found at
the following link.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/no0qvaxxalnf1m4/usability%20document%20for%20frescobauldi.pdf
I hope this helps a bit. Should
Hello,
I'm trying to get the whiteout that is attached to the NoteHead to not
cover the ledger line. Also, it would be ideal if I could extend the
width of the whiteout to the width of the ledger lines.
The code below gives the output shown in the attached image. I've tried
substituting Staf
>I'm trying to get the whiteout that is attached to the NoteHead to not
cover the ledger line. Also, it would be ideal if I could extend the width
of the whiteout to the width of the ledger lines.
Does this work? (replace the \with-color value to color #white)
aBox = \markup {
2014-05-21 18:29 GMT+02:00 Javier Ruiz-Alma :
> I used a filled-box and played around with the layers to partially cover
> the beam, but not other grobs.
> I'm stuck figuring out how to avoid the box covering staff lines.
> Here's the layer assignments I have:
>
> \override Beam.layer = #0
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
