Am 10.11.2012 14:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
[...]
-i isn't an option of touch. It is an option of rm. The touch places
a file -i in the directory. At least with POSIX sort order, this is
bound to come rather early in a directory listing, so if you have
files a, b, c in the directory, rm * .o e
Hello Mogens,
AFAIK quoted lyrics has to be done "manually" right now.
In those cases, I usually create a CueVoice="mycue" and quote the needed
music in there. Then I can create Lyrics (with a smaller font) that is
assigned to that voice with \lyricsto "mycue".
Those cases are not too often, so
Hi, Paul:
Thank you for the custom key signature. I have been dreaming this for
sometime, but hesitate to ask lilypond user community. I have been using
circle of fifths to identify the key signature.
You mention this custom key signature can be adapted to print above the clef
sign. I am no
While incorporating this code in another score I came across a layouting
problem: if the tempo name is sufficiently long, then the first measure
number will be rendered _above_ the tempo indicator.
This problem only occurs when \omitParenthesizedBarNumbers is invoked in the
layout block.
Probably
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> I'm happy (and also proud) to be able to announce a new release of my
> lilyglyphs LaTeX package.
> While I label it version 0.2 I am convinced that it is the first release
> that is really useable, so I consider this the initial 'public' release
Dear community,
I have the same problem like Trevor Bača, years ago.
See at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-11/msg00265.html
Is there a solution available?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mai
Well, nobody stops you from beautifying the revision report as well ;-)
But seriously, if you are looking for something to play with, you can take that
document too - with credits to Git ...
Best
Urs
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
"Janek Warch
Stefan Thomas-5 wrote
> Dear community,
> I have the same problem like Trevor Bača, years ago.
> See at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-11/msg00265.html
> Is there a solution available?
sure - what version are you using?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lil
\version "2.16.0" \times 2/3 { c'8 c' c' }
Is there a way to get the TupletNumber to show up on the note head side instead
of the beam side? Seems to me that this would be a pretty common tweak, and I
can't find it in the manuals or the LSR or anywhere in the list archives.
DR
___
hi..i have the same question..?!
I reed somewhere that git isn't intended for binary packages..
and i transcribed (by ear) many scores i don't have rights for..
how do you handle this kind of staff..
What are the laws related to such situations?!
this is what my brother and i are working on
https
Daniel Rosen writes:
> \version "2.16.0" \times 2/3 { c'8 c' c' }
>
> Is there a way to get the TupletNumber to show up on the note head
> side instead of the beam side? Seems to me that this would be a pretty
> common tweak, and I can't find it in the manuals or the LSR or
> anywhere in the list
Dear community,
I'm using version 2.16.0
Subject: Re: aftergrace with pitchedtrill
Message-ID: <1352647402382-136192.p...@n5.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Stefan Thomas-5 wrote
> Dear community,
> I have the same problem like Trevor Ba?a, years ago.
> See at
> http://lists.gn
2012/11/11 Stjepan Horvat :
> I reed somewhere that git isn't intended for binary packages..
Humans are not intended for tracking per-line changes on binary files,
either. Git can do it, for example people adds videos to git repos,
but it is not of great help except that you can mix binaries with
And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..?!
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/11/11 Stjepan Horvat :
> > I reed somewhere that git isn't intended for binary packages..
>
> Humans are not intended for tracking per-line changes on binary files,
Il 11/11/2012 18:54, Stjepan Horvat ha scritto:
And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..?!
Sure it's illegal, if material is copyrighted and you don't have the rights.
If you use a private repository I think it's ok.
___
l
Am 11.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Federico Bruni:
Il 11/11/2012 18:54, Stjepan Horvat ha scritto:
And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..?!
Sure it's illegal, if material is copyrighted and you don't have the
rights.
If you use a private repository I think it's ok.
Of
Thanks guys..this was unclear to me..
..so Copyright is the key word..
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 11.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Federico Bruni:
>
> Il 11/11/2012 18:54, Stjepan Horvat ha scritto:
>>
>>> And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..
Am 11.11.2012 17:43, schrieb Stjepan Horvat:
hi..i have the same question..?!
I reed somewhere that git isn'tintended for binary packages..
What Git does is comparing files line by line, which essentially works
only for text files.
It stores the differences between the files which can be a singl
On 11 November 2012 18:39, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> and i transcribed (by ear) many scores i don't have rights for..
>>
>> how do you handle this kind of staff..
>> What are the laws related to such situations?!
>
> I think copyright laws are clear, regardless of whether you
> transcribed it by ea
On Nov 11, 2012, at 7:38 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
> Hi, Paul: Thank you for the custom key signature. I have been dreaming this
> for sometime, but hesitate to ask lilypond user community. I have been using
> circle of fifths to identify the key signature.
Hi Ming, I'm glad you find it useful
On Nov 11, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:10:44 +0100
> From: Marc Hohl
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: helper function that should take a list argument doesn't
> do anything
> Message-ID: <509f5d84.7050...@hohlart.de>
> Content-
Patrick or Cynthia Karl writes:
> On Nov 11, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:10:44 +0100
>> From: Marc Hohl
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: helper function that should take a list argument doesn't
>> do anything
>> Message-ID
I guess I should have been more clear, but I was in a rush. What I'm actually
looking for is a function to have tuplet numbers ALWAYS appear on the note head
side, regardless of stem direction.
DR
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 11,
Also, I'm a little confused as to why \override TupletNumber #'direction = #-1
isn't working just as well in the meantime.
DR
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:52 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direct
Daniel Rosen writes:
> Also, I'm a little confused as to why \override TupletNumber
> #'direction = #-1 isn't working just as well in the meantime.
Because it is not consulted?
\version "2.16.0"
\new Voice {
\times 2/3 { c'8 c' c' }
\override TupletBracket #'direction = #DOWN
\times 2/3 {
I need to make a number of charts that demonstrate various kinds of
non-traditional scales. Appended is a lilypond example towards
something I would like to do. The first issue I would
like to deal with is as follows:
I need the rests and notes to line up precisely. D natural on
the lower st
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> I guess I should have been more clear, but I was in a rush. What I'm actually
> looking for is a function to have tuplet numbers ALWAYS appear on the note
> head side, regardless of stem direction.
You could do something like this, which lo
Aha! That would explain it.
DR
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+drosen27=gmail@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+drosen27=gmail@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:47 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: lilyp
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> You did not copy and paste valid LilyPond code into #{ #}. You replaced
>>> a constant in a constant list by a symbol. That was not valid outside
>>>
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> What really annoys me is the fact that rm has no reasonable safeguard.
>> [...] i'd like to see a safeguard against deleting too many files
>
> rm is not a file manager. I do larger renaming/removal workloads using
Ben,
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> David:
>
> I see, thanks for clarifying that for me. So, in your opinion, if I wanted
> to use these aleatoric boxes on a few scores here and there, that would be
> doable - though not ideal, it would /work/- correct? I wouldn't ever
Am 07.11.2012 01:25, schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> On 2012-11-06 23:14, Noeck wrote:
>> many years ago I made a cheat sheet for Lilypond, because I couldn't
>> remember all the syntax by heart. Now, after having used Lilypond for
>> some years and after reading the notation reference again, I've m
Fantastic. I had a feeling that it would be a relatively simple function (it
certainly appears to be), but I know absolutely nothing about Scheme. I'll have
to read the Extending manual one of these days.
DR
-Original Message-
From: David Nalesnik [mailto:david.nales...@gmail.com]
Se
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> Fantastic. I had a feeling that it would be a relatively simple function (it
> certainly appears to be), but I know absolutely nothing about Scheme. I'll
> have to read the Extending manual one of these days.
>
Yes--Scheme certainly opens u
Thank you for all your comments on my cheat sheet[1]!
I included them and spotted some more. Here are the updated versions of
the English and the German cheat sheet (in svg and pdf format)[2]:
http://joramberger.de/files/lilypond_sheet_en.svg
http://joramberger.de/files/lilypond_sheet_en.pdf
http
Here is an improved version. It works the same as the last,
but with much more streamlined and concise code.
-Paul
\version "2.16.0"
#(define Custom_key_sig_engraver
(make-engraver
(acknowledgers
((key-signature-interface engraver grob source-engraver)
(let* (
Hi,
Is it possible to get lilypond to break lines for me when using
gregorian.ly? having to add something like \bar "" \break by hand is a
bit frustrating, given lilypond normally does quite a good job of line
breaks.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
`O'-0 `O'---. `O'---. `O'---.
\__
David,
Thanks for the feedback! It's sad to hear that boxed notation is a bit
challenging in LilyPond (i.e. not possible without "breaking" parts of it) -
do you think there will ever be a native, more acceptable way to do boxed
notation in the future? I'm not much a programmer so I apologize if
2012/11/11 David Nalesnik :
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>> Fantastic. I had a feeling that it would be a relatively simple function (it
>> certainly appears to be), but I know absolutely nothing about Scheme. I'll
>> have to read the Extending manual one of these days.
I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be added
to the LSR. Quite frankly, I'm surprised something similar isn't there already.
DR
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 5:32 PM
To: D
2012/11/11 shutterfreak :
> While incorporating this code in another score I came across a layouting
> problem: if the tempo name is sufficiently long, then the first measure
> number will be rendered _above_ the tempo indicator.
>
> This problem only occurs when \omitParenthesizedBarNumbers is inv
Stefan Thomas-5 wrote
> Dear community,
> I'm using version 2.16.0
Trevor complained about:
/But combining pitchedTrill with afterGrace gives a wide and varied
array of warnings and errors, …/
is that still the case with 2.16.0?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Thomas Morley <
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2012/11/11 shutterfreak :
> > While incorporating this code in another score I came across a layouting
> > problem: if the tempo name is sufficiently long, then the first measure
> > number will be rendered _
Ben,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks for the feedback! It's sad to hear that boxed notation is a bit
> challenging in LilyPond (i.e. not possible without "breaking" parts of it) -
> do you think there will ever be a native, more acceptable way to do box
2012/11/11 Daniel Rosen :
> I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be
> added to the LSR. Quite frankly, I'm surprised something similar isn't there
> already.
>
> DR
Do you really think it's usefull?
As soon as polyphonic occurs, it will produce weird output (I th
Well, that's what I meant when I said that I can't speak to whether the code
was good--I don't know what kind of stuff to check for. But I do personally
think the functionality is useful.
DR
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, No
Hi Joram,
Thank you for the updates cheat sheet.
As a matter of fact I just printed both cheat sheets on one sheet of paper
and laminated it. Two sides of invaluable LilyPond information :-)
Hint 1: use heavier stock paper when printing double sided.
Hint 2: print borderless for printing the oth
2012/11/11 Eluze :
> Stefan Thomas-5 wrote
>> Dear community,
>> I'm using version 2.16.0
>
> Trevor complained about:
>
> /But combining pitchedTrill with afterGrace gives a wide and varied
> array of warnings and errors, …/
>
> is that still the case with 2.16.0?
>
> Eluze
I tested:
\new Staff
2012/11/7 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Will do, if noone comes up with a better solution or finds a drawback.
>
> We have markup commands \note and \note-by-number. It seems to me that
> it would likely be most straightforward to provide the same for \rest
> and possibly \rest-by-
2012/11/12 Eric :
> I've had this problem for awhile but in 2.16.0 hit on something that worked
> once. Whether it can be generalized to a _solution_ I don't know. Here's a
> snippet, I hope it helps (it's from a cadenza-like passage in a violin part
> of a quartet (composed ca.1899, published post
2012/11/11 Urs Liska :
> Well, nobody stops you from beautifying the revision report as well ;-)
>
> But seriously, if you are looking for something to play with, you can take
> that document too - with credits to Git ...
>
> Best
> Urs
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon m
David:
I'll keep you posted for sure. Say, do you suppose that this boxed notation
utility could be implemented sooner (and perhaps with more powerful
features) in LilyPond if funding/support increased? If so, this is one
feature where I'd absolutely give all that I could to make possible. :) $
Am 12.11.2012 01:15, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi Urs,
btw, I recently wished to link to your LilyPond tutorial, announced here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00450.html
Couldn't find it anymore.
Cancelled? Link changed?
Ah, it is now at
http://lilypond.ursliska.de/n
2012/11/12 Urs Liska :
> Am 12.11.2012 01:15, schrieb Thomas Morley:
>
>>
>> Hi Urs,
>>
>> btw, I recently wished to link to your LilyPond tutorial, announced here:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00450.html
>>
>> Couldn't find it anymore.
>> Cancelled? Link changed?
>
2012/11/9 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> I was working on
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-11/msg00185.html
>> and wrote a event-function as a template for custom-script-signs.
>> This function uses some optional arguments and works as expected in 2.16.0
>> But
Vaughan McAlley mcalley.net.au> writes:
> I want to notate a modal canon at the fifth. \modalTranspose works
> well until there are accidentals in the original line. Fiddling with
> the scale by adding notes causes problems; what would be nice is to be
> able to specify *two* scales:
\modalTrans
Aristotle Esguerra esguerra.info> writes:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=377
> Is there a similar way to create square brackets that span an entire system?
>
The answer appears to be no, although it would seem to be useful to have.
Drawing one bracket across many staves is more diff
Now thats a useful information..i will ask a lawyer here in croatia and
report what i heard.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:33 PM, martinwguy wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 18:39, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> and i transcribed (by ear) many scores i don't have rights for..
> >>
> >> how do you handle t
58 matches
Mail list logo
