Hi Ben,
Am 09.11.2012 08:58, schrieb soundsfromsound:
Marc:
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to upset him or anything. I'm confused, as I've
been replying the same way to each thread and never knew there was a problem
until now. Should I be hitting "reply" or "reply to author" when I want to
respond
Marc:
One more thing too:
Why is it that his recent emails pertaining to my lack of quotings show up
as "Re:" yet appear to be a "new" thread, like a standalone thread with no
previous posts attached to them? See each of them and their number of
replies? How'd that happen? Just curious. That'
Am 09.11.2012 09:04, schrieb soundsfromsound:
Marc:
One more thing too:
Why is it that his recent emails pertaining to my lack of quotings show up
as "Re:" yet appear to be a "new" thread, like a standalone thread with no
previous posts attached to them? See each of them and their number of
re
Patrick or Cynthia Karl writes:
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:56:35 -0800 (PST)
>> From: soundsfromsound
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 120, Issue 36
>> Message-ID: <1352429795869-136054.p...@n5.nabble.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=
Marc Hohl writes:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Am 09.11.2012 08:58, schrieb soundsfromsound:
>> Marc:
>>
>> I'm sorry, I didn't mean to upset him or anything. I'm confused, as
>> I've been replying the same way to each thread and never knew there
>> was a problem until now. Should I be hitting "reply" or "rep
Am 09.11.2012 09:14, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
Hi Ben,
Am 09.11.2012 08:58, schrieb soundsfromsound:
Marc:
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to upset him or anything. I'm confused, as
I've been replying the same way to each thread and never knew there
was a problem until now. Should
David,
I just wanted to respond and say that I understand what you wrote and now am
fully on the same page with you as far as how the digest/mailing list is
organized and maintained. For my future responses, I'll trim all quotes as
needed, and make sure that I do all that I can to ensure clarity
Hi Lilypond Experts,
I should like to increase the size of rehearsal marks relative to the stave.
I'm sure that it has something to do with
\set Score.markformatter and#'font-size
but I can't work out how to put these two bits together and where.
I am sorry if there is a bit of the docum
Am 09.11.2012 09:32, schrieb Alex Voice:
Hi Lilypond Experts,
I should like to increase the size of rehearsal marks relative to the
stave.
I'm sure that it has something to do with
\set Score.markformatter and#'font-size
but I can't work out how to put these two bits together and wher
soundsfromsound writes:
> David,
>
> I just wanted to respond and say that I understand what you wrote and now am
> fully on the same page with you as far as how the digest/mailing list is
> organized and maintained. For my future responses, I'll trim all quotes as
> needed, and make sure that I
I apologize, my brain is a bit tired - it's almost 4am here :) I think I
typed the word forum because it was fresh on my mind since I visit the
Nabble "forum" archive for the mailing list. Sorry for the confusion. I
should rest my brain for the night now, hehe...talk to you all soon.
Ben
-->
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 09.11.2012 09:32, schrieb Alex Voice:
>> Hi Lilypond Experts,
>>
>> I should like to increase the size of rehearsal marks relative to
>> the stave.
>>
>> I'm sure that it has something to do with
>>
>> \set Score.markformatter and#'font-size
>>
>> but I can't work out
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
For 2.16.0:
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'font-size = #...
In 2.17.x something like
\override Score.RehearsalMark.font-size = #...
Just a short note: in 2.17.x, the first version will work just fine. It
will likely get a warning in 2.20, and st
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:02 AM, SoundsFromSound
wrote:
> I apologize, my brain is a bit tired - it's almost 4am here :) I think I
> typed the word forum because it was fresh on my mind since I visit the
> Nabble "forum" archive for the mailing list. Sorry for the confusion. I
> should rest my b
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:02 AM, SoundsFromSound
> wrote:
>> I apologize, my brain is a bit tired - it's almost 4am here :) I think I
>> typed the word forum because it was fresh on my mind since I visit the
>> Nabble "forum" archive for the mailing list. Sorry for the c
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
>
> I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
> of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
From my pov, I very much see David==global cause. With David, LilyPond
has one full t
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
>>
>> I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
>> of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
>
> From my pov, I very much see David==global cause
Hi friends,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>Janek wrote:
>> Imagine that next month David receives 10 times the money
>> he usually gets: we'd have David covered for next ~10 months,
>
> More like the next 6 months. [snip explanation]
ok, i'm fine with that.
And i definitel
David Kastrup writes:
> It is not really "almost",
Okay..at what % of David are we, then?
> and I am not easily interchangeable as there are some things I am
> pretty good at, and some things I am pretty bad at.
Good :-)
> So if there was enough money to go around, I'd
> recommend not getting
Dear lovely LilyPond community,
I am wondering if there's already a public repository to upload LilyPond
code of full works that are not just useful snippets (which already
exists). If one doesn't already exist, would it be useful for people if I
set one up?
I use Git version control for all my L
Yes, I started using Git for the same reason several months ago, and I'm
still thrilled by the implications this has.
It is really perfect to be able to version-control ones sources.
But it's even better for collaborating - working together at the same
files while nearly not having to worry abou
2012/11/9 Urs Liska :
> Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that what you
> mean?
and it's on git:
https://github.com/chrissawer/The-Mutopia-Project
I think that an information missing here[1] is where you can retrieve
public domain scores to be digitalized (lilypondized?).
Try IMSLP to start with. Tons of very interesting music available there.
http://imslp.org/
Regards,
Wim.
On 9 Nov 2012, at 17:32 , Federico Bruni wrote:
2012/11/9 Urs Liska :
Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that
what you
mean?
and it's on git:
https://github
Am 09.11.2012 17:54, schrieb Wim van Dommelen:
Try IMSLP to start with. Tons of very interesting music available there.
http://imslp.org/
Regards,
Wim.
Yes, that's what I'd said also (if I understand you right that you are
looking for score that can be recreated with LilyPond).
The offer mu
As wonderful as Mutopia is, it can't be the home of all open scores.
It would be good to have an aggregator-based approach rather than one
where everybody uses the same repo.
Personally, I use Github whenever I make a Lilypond score of a public
domain source. See:
https://github.com/lucasgonze/
Am 09.11.2012 14:55, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi friends,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek wrote:
Imagine that next month David receives 10 times the money
he usually gets: we'd have David covered for next ~10 months,
More like the next 6 months. [snip explanation]
o
Hi,
Is there a mechanism for lyrics similar to \quoteDuring? I naively tried
\version "2.16.0"
soprano = \relative c'' { a2 b4 c d e f g }
alto= \relative c' { e4 f2 g4 a b c d }
sopranoText = \lyricmode { one two three four five six seven eight }
altoText= \lyricmode { en to tre fir
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Well, I don't feel a *conflict* situation here, but that may be
> founded in me born in the "wrong" piece of earth ;-)
>
> If there really *is* a conflict/misunderstanding here, the
> concerning parties *should* try to solve it: via private mail,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> First, let's assume 2.16 (the current development version will not
> accept the above syntax of \overrideProperty even in the first variant).
Yes. I haven't made the switch yet.
> Then inside of # itself, like with #'((alignement-distances
2012/11/9 Janek Warchoł :
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
[...)
> Sorry for being grumpy - i'm frustrated with some other things, for
> example the fact that all my data got deleted because of a script bug,
> and the fact that the behaviour of 'rm' makes it very difficult to
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> First, let's assume 2.16 (the current development version will not
>> accept the above syntax of \overrideProperty even in the first variant).
>
> Yes. I haven't made the switch yet.
>
>> Then inside of # itself, li
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I stumbled across
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=631
>
> {
>
> }
>
> works.
>
Thanks again Thomas, I completely forgot about the chord trick for
articulations.
Best regards,
Olivier
___
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Then you are writing a quoted list here. Inside of a quoted list, _all_
>> symbols are quoted, not referenced for their value. So you need either
>> to use proper evaluated Scheme here, like
>> #(list (cons 'alig
David Kastrup writes:
> Actually, if you were using 2.17.6, you could just write
>
> staffdist =
> #(define-music-function (parser location distances)
> (list?)
> #{
> \overrideProperty
> Score.Non
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:11:15 +0100
From: David Kastrup
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Increasing the size of rehearsal marks
Message-ID: <87vcdfi1jg@fencepost.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 09.11.2012 09:32, schrieb Alex Voice:
>> Hi Lilypond Experts,
>>
I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> As wonderful as Mutopia is, it can't be the home of all open scores.
> It would be good to have an aggregator-based ap
On Nov 9, 2012 4:22 PM, "Lucas Gonze" wrote:
> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
There are quite a few if you look around.
-Jay
___
lilypond-user mailing
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the frameEngraver3.ly code from this aleatoric notation
thread going on Lilypond 2.16.0-1, and I get the following errors:
GNU LilyPond 2.16.0
Processing `frameEngraver.ly'
Parsing...
frameEngraver.ly:27:1: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning here
Jeff:
I actually just found myself having that same exact problem tonight as well.
My error says:
"Event class should be a list..."
...just the way you mention it for your score. I'm not sure how to proceed,
but I just wanted to let you know that it's not just you. And I too am not
very comf
On 10/11/12 03:08, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that what
> you mean?
>
Mutopiaproject seems pretty dead. No scores have appeared there since 12
February, including a couple that I sent them subsequent to that date,
and they don't answer their e-ma
On 10 November 2012 00:22, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
Dunno. When did you start?
https://github.com/martinwguy/delia-derbyshire/tree/master/scores
M
_
Jeffrey Trevino writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get the frameEngraver3.ly code from this aleatoric
> notation thread going on Lilypond 2.16.0-1, and I get the following
> errors:
>
> GNU LilyPond 2.16.0
> Processing `frameEngraver.ly'
> Parsing...
> frameEngraver.ly:27:1: error: GUILE signale
On 10 November 2012 07:40, martinwguy wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 00:22, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
>> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
>
> Dunno. When did you start?
> https://github.com/martinwguy/delia-der
You can generate your own lilypond scores page at www.omet.ca. Just upload
your sources, compile them, and you'll get a page like this:
http://www.omet.ca/scores/Mike_Blackstock_2/
It also also has musicXML to lilypond conversion online; there's lots of
musicXML scores out there on the web.
Che
44 matches
Mail list logo
