2012/3/10 :
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2012/3/10 :
>> > FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
>> > candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>> >
>> > ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>>
>> What makes it differen
Hello list,
I'm investigating how one could implement a glissando. So far, I've found three
solutions:
- \glissando itself
- \makeClusters with a single note instead of a chord
- \markup (with \beam, \path or \postscript)
while \glissando is a simple solution, it gives a very narrow line -- wh
On 2012.03.10., at 8:51, Siska Ádám wrote:
> On 2012.03.10., at 3:00, Nick Payne wrote:
>> On 10/03/12 10:24, Siska Ádám wrote:
>>> On 2012.03.09., at 23:44, -Eluze wrote:
Siska Ádám-4 wrote:
> Dear list,
>
>
> I've been using Lilypond for a while, but only to create excerpts
Am 10.03.2012 07:41, schrieb J Ruiz:
Hello,
I'm using v2.14.2
Trying to typeset this 19th century arpeggio notation with a slash
across a note. It's described:
"Chords marked as shown (see attached) are played as the preceding
arpeggio chords, with the addition of a note where the oblique line
Siska Ádám-4 wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
>
> I'm investigating how one could implement a glissando. So far, I've found
> three solutions:
>
> - \glissando itself
> - \makeClusters with a single note instead of a chord
> - \markup (with \beam, \path or \postscript)
>
> while \glissando is a simp
On 2012.03.10., at 10:23, Tiresia GIUNO wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:30:23 +0100
> Siska Ádám wrote:
>> while \glissando is a simple solution, it gives a very narrow line --
>> which I didn't find how I could make thicker -- and there's
>> absolutely no control over the shape of the line (so on
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:35PM -0600, James Worlton wrote:
> I have downloaded and extracted Lilypond 2.15.33 on my PPC Mac 10.4.11.
> Everything seems to work fine. No problems here!
>
> James Worlton
Thanks for the feedback, James.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
> I'm not top posting.
Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes:
>
> 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on
> my
MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8.
>
Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James Worlton. Updated status
below.
In this table below "ok" mea
On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
2.14.2.
I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page
clearly says "MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported.".
Only sent to Phil again yesterday. Now to you all.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:37:50PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Dear list
>
> I am trying something new; I want to include a logo in my copyright line. I
> have here a one-page sheet consisting of a score and a markup block which
> contains the t
hello,
On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote:
> On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
>>> 2.14.2.
>>
>> I'd use different terminology. The lilypond
Hello again,
On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote:
> On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
>>> 2.14.2.
>>
>> I'd use different terminology. The lil
On 10-3-2012 11:12, Colin Hall wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:35PM -0600, James Worlton wrote:
I have downloaded and extracted Lilypond 2.15.33 on my PPC Mac 10.4.11.
Everything seems to work fine. No problems here!
James Worlton
Thanks for the feedback, James.
Cheers,
Colin.
Just dow
Hi Ádám,
I just realized that the solution is not as good as it seemed to be. It
> seems that if I use a markup, the distance between subsequent crotchets
> won't be the same, as the first crotchet of the measure (the one that is
> represented by the markup) will be placed a little more left than
Hans,
On 10 March 2012 13:59, Hans Aikema wrote:
> On 10-3-2012 11:12, Colin Hall wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:35PM -0600, James Worlton wrote:
>>>
>>> I have downloaded and extracted Lilypond 2.15.33 on my PPC Mac 10.4.11.
>>> Everything seems to work fine. No problems here!
>>>
I can confirm that LilyPond 2.15.33 loads and correctly compiles my code on
both ppc and x86 platforms running OS 10.5.8.
Stan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Ádám,
What about using proportional spacing and then moving the bar line slightly
> to the right?
>
Attached is an attempt at automating this somewhat. I haven't tested it
extensively, but I hope it will be useful.
-David
barline-through-note01.ly
Description: Binary data
_
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2012/3/10 :
>> > FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
>> > candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>> >
>> > ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>>
>> Wh
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/3/10 :
>> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
>> candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>>
>> ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>
> What makes it different from http://lilypond.org/unix.html#Download-3 ?
I'd rather say
Hi list,
tupletFullLength = ##t
causes the right hand part of the tuplet bracket to clash with the
barline. This only happens with a barline at the end of a line.
Is there a way to avoid this?
Many thanks,
Peter
--
//=
-> Peter O'Doherty
-> http://www.peterodoh
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:30:23 +0100
Siska Ádám wrote:
> while \glissando is a simple solution, it gives a very narrow line --
> which I didn't find how I could make thicker -- and there's
> absolutely no control over the shape of the line (so one can't make a
> non-linear glissando with it).
>
Hans Aikema writes:
> On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
>>> 2.14.2.
>> I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page
>> clearly says "MacOS
Hi!
I am working with music (chant) using the modern transcription of ancient
music as recommended. I noticed that the line breaks, which can occur between
any two words or even between syllables in a single word, do not take into
consideration the lyric hyphens so they many times end up going o
Hi all,
I recently installed the most recent Frescobaldi 2.0.4 on my Windoze box
(XP Pro), and last night got the latest Lily 2.15.33.
Now when I try to work on a file, the point-and-click seems to be broken.
When I mouse over a note in the pdf, it puts the cursor in the editor on a
spot right at
2012/3/10 David Kastrup :
>> I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is
>> incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't
>> even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is
>> missing afaics on the pages in Czech (cs), Hungarian (hu), Japa
2012/3/10 Father Gordon Gilbert :
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed the most recent Frescobaldi 2.0.4 on my Windoze box (XP
> Pro), and last night got the latest Lily 2.15.33.
>
> Now when I try to work on a file, the point-and-click seems to be broken.
> When I mouse over a note in the pdf, it pu
2012/3/10 Zsolt Cselényi :
> Hi!
>
> I am working with music (chant) using the modern transcription of ancient
> music as recommended. I noticed that the line breaks, which can occur between
> any two words or even between syllables in a single word, do not take into
> consideration the lyric hyph
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:59:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
> > 2012/3/10 :
> >> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
> >> candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
> >>
> >> ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
> >
> > What m
- Original Message -
From: "Zsolt Cselényi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:16 PM
Subject: lyric hyphen goes outside staff limits at line break
Hi!
I am working with music (chant) using the modern transcription of ancient
music as recommended. I noticed that the line breaks,
Also you may want to check under the program options to make sure the
pdf reader is properly pointing to the correct pdf reader version.
Under settings program configure or something like that.
Shane
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/3/10 Father Gordon Gilbert :
>> H
On 10-3-2012 15:12, James wrote:
Hans,
On 10 March 2012 13:59, Hans Aikema wrote:
On 10-3-2012 11:12, Colin Hall wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:35PM -0600, James Worlton wrote:
I have downloaded and extracted Lilypond 2.15.33 on my PPC Mac 10.4.11.
Everything seems to work fine. No pr
Hi again,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi Ádám,
>
> What about using proportional spacing and then moving the bar line
>> slightly to the right?
>>
>
> Attached is an attempt at automating this somewhat. I haven't tested it
> extensively, but I hope it will be useful.
Hi guys,
Yes, changing a note and recompiling did the trick, thanks! I had done a
convert-ly and recompiled, and I suppose that's why it pointed down to
where the changes were listed.
Thanks for fantastic programs, both Lily and Fresco, and thanks for such an
active and helpful forum.
Blessings
Am 10.03.2012 um 11:22 schrieb Colin Hall:
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes:
>>
>> 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on
>> my
> MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8.
>>
>
> Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James W
2012/3/10 Father Gordon Gilbert :
> Hi guys,
>
> Yes, changing a note and recompiling did the trick, thanks! I had done a
> convert-ly and recompiled, and I suppose that's why it pointed down to where
> the changes were listed.
It is not really necessary to change a note but that makes you
visual
Hello,
On 10 March 2012 08:18, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> tupletFullLength = ##t
>
> causes the right hand part of the tuplet bracket to clash with the barline.
> This only happens with a barline at the end of a line.
>
> Is there a way to avoid this?
>
Tiny example and the version yo
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:33:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is
> there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should
> prefer your "ad-hoc port" over the official distribution for FreeBSD?
>
> > What version
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:15:39PM -0800, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
> This port provides a minimal framework compatible with the
> FreeBSD ports system which permits any ports-enabled BSD system
> to use standard BSD management tools (portupgrade, pkg_delete,
> etc.) to build, package, install,
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/3/10 David Kastrup :
>>> I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is
>>> incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't
>>> even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is
>>> missing afaics on the pages in C
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Zsolt Cselényi" gmail.com>
> To: gnu.org>
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:16 PM
> Subject: lyric hyphen goes outside staff limits at line break
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am working with music (chant) using the moder
Why do Bar Lines disappear when reducing the Staff Line count? I've tried
several alterations to the layout context for score, but don't get the
right results.
\version "2.15.33"
\relative c'' {
\override Staff . StaffSymbol #'line-count = #1
b4 s r r
b b8 b b b s4
b s s s
}
Thanks!
Mark
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:33:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is
>> there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should
>> prefer your "ad-hoc port" over the official distribu
On Mar 10, 2012, at 1:35 PM, James wrote:
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:34:40 +
> From: James
> To: "Peter O'Doherty"
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: tupletFullLength clashes with barline
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello
Hi Mark,
> Why do Bar Lines disappear when reducing the Staff Line count?
I don't know exactly…
> I've tried several alterations to the layout context for score, but don't get
> the right results.
How about this?
\version "2.15.33"
\relative c'' {
\override Staff.BarLine #'bar-extent = #'(-2
Zsolt Cselényi wrote:
>
> Here is an example, as short as I could make it:
>
>
> \paper {
> paper-width = 28\mm
> left-margin = 0\mm
> right-margin = 0\mm
> }
>
> For the above the first line is broken after three "bla"-s and the hyphen
> of the
> last "bla" sticks out completely on the
Hi Zsolt,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 4:43 PM, -Eluze wrote:
>
>
> Zsolt Cselényi wrote:
> >
> > For the above the first line is broken after three "bla"-s and the hyphen
> > of the
> > last "bla" sticks out completely on the right.
> >
> hi
>
> I think the paper-width is very short, too - is that y
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
>
> > Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD
> > ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond
> > port). Given that a call for testers was made recently, I
>
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
>>
>> > Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD
>> > ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond
>> > port). Given that a call f
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> So what is the difference as compared to the version on the LilyPond
> download page? What makes the download for FreeBSD that we offer less
> desirable?
I am only one person, and I cannot make global, objective
statements about
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:08:45AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> >> Remember: I don't use FreeBSD. Only you can answer this question and
> >> thus tell us in what way what we are offering currently is a waste of
> >> time and effort.
> >
> > Nah, I can answer the question. :)
> >
> > Relax. H
On 2012.03.10., at 18:14, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ádám,
>>
>> What about using proportional spacing and then moving the bar line
>>> slightly to the right?
>>>
>>
>> Attached is an attempt at automating this somew
Kieren,
Fantastic!
Thank you!
Mark
(Forgot to copy to the list first time...)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Ádám,
thank you a lot for this solution. It is much better than anything I
> expected to achieve.
>
Glad to hear it!
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Once again, thank you, to both of you! I learned TWO new things today!
Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Possibly a common question, sorry if asked and answered before, but Google
failed me...
I'm considering some aleatoric notation (so-called "box notation") for a piece
but couldn't find info in the manuals (the "contemporary notation" section of
the 2.14.2 docs @ lilypond.org is empty), or in th
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Frescobaldi 2.0.4 (www.frescobaldi.org) is out with the following
> changes [...]
>
> It's my birthday present to the LilyPond-loving community :-)
Thanks and happy birthday to you! Frescobaldi is great!
cheers,
Janek
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Brett Blackstone
wrote:
>
> I am trying to come up with a with of writing Kodály stick notation, which is
> essentially regular notation with the note heads removed (except for half
> notes and whole notes) that includes the solfege designation and the lyrics.
> Thi
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:12:35 +0100,
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> The best way to achieve that with current LilyPond is Scheme engravers.
>
> There have been a few examples of Scheme engravers posted on this list (if
> you search Scheme engraver you'll find one - there are also examples in the
58 matches
Mail list logo
