Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes: >> >> > Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD >> > ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond >> > port). Given that a call for testers was made recently, I >> > decided to create a port framework for FreeBSD so that I can >> > track frequent upgrades of pre-release development versions using >> > BSD's convenient ports system.
>> Remember: I don't use FreeBSD. Only you can answer this question and >> thus tell us in what way what we are offering currently is a waste of >> time and effort. > > Nah, I can answer the question. :) > > Relax. He's being a nice freebsd person, and what he's doing will > be understood by other freebsd people. It's nothing that the > lilypond developers should be concerned about. We should not be concerned about what our users want and need? Well, at the very least we don't want to look stupid. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
