lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: >> 2012/3/10 <lilyp...@umpquanet.com>: >> > FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33 >> > candidate may download an ad-hoc port from: >> > >> > ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar >> >> What makes it different from http://lilypond.org/unix.html#Download-3 ? > > Download them both and compare, and I think you'll see pretty > quickly. They're different animals.
Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should prefer your "ad-hoc port" over the official distribution for FreeBSD? > What version of FreeBSD are you running? What makes you think that every developer is running every system for which LilyPond provides binaries? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
