Marc Hohl schrieb:
[...]
Meanwhile, it tried to expand your function by adapting some lsr
snippets,
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=82
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=696
Playing (or struggling?) with the latter, I came up with the following:
---8<---
\version "2.13.32"
#(define (ma
What are everyone's first impressions of 2.13.34, the alpha test?
I remembered to run convert-ly (which worked for me, but I don't have MacOS
10.4, where James W ran into trouble) but it made very few changes to scores
written for 2.12.
The change that jumped out at me was the spacing, both of
>> if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
>> you:
>> 1) save typing
>>
> Yes, if I were just starting, I would save typing. This time I didn't
> discover this problem until I already had it done the other way, so it's
> just going to be extra work. Yeah, I know I'm
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Phil Burfitt"
; "Kaz Kylheku"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
Phil Holmes wote Thursday, September 23, 2010 6:37 PM
I have noticed the way Adobe Reader re
- Original Message -
From: "James Wilkinson"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 12:27 AM
Subject: 2.13.34-1 freezes when updating syntax (Mac 10.4)
Gets to the point of saying "Applying conversion:" and just stops
Others might understand this, but I haven't a clue what you're say
Yes, I am doing a jazz-style arrangement. I guess I'll just make a chord of
whole notes so the \arpeggio will work.
I ended up using *1 \arpeggio -\markup {\italic \fontsize #2 "Fine"}
\fermata* to get the arpeggio glyph to display.
Thanks for pointing out the oversight on needing at least two s
Perhaps that version of LilyPond puts the PDF in a different directory
than the .ly file is in
MING TSANG wrote:
I use jedit with lilypond tool. I also use lilypond 2.13.33 The
console has the following message. However, I cannot locate the .pdf
file. I do a search on c:\ drive and cannot fin
Carl,
first of all thank you very much for your patch! I had a quick look
at it on Rietveld and I'm stunned. I don't know how you managed to
get all of this done in such a short period of time.
Am 24.09.2010 um 07:12 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
Patrick,
I've loaded a patch on Rietveld that all
Am 23.09.2010, 16:52 Uhr, schrieb Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From: "-Eluze"
i have modified it now - i have no idea how long it takes to be
"officialy"
reachable, but in case you can look for ⌂ printing odd bar numbers only
or
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=712
On 2010-09-24 13:56, eluze wrote:
Am 23.09.2010, 16:52 Uhr, schrieb Phil Holmes :
Snippets need to be marked approved before they are visible. I can do
this, so if you want one checking and approving, please ask here.
yes, please - is it usual to mention the author? if yes, then Alexander
Kobe
Kaz,
thank you. I don't know how to run lilypond on CMD EXE. Can you provide some
command line script?
I try the alternative method as suggested. I got the following message:
"GS.EXE entry point not found -- the procedure entry point
gsapi_delete_insta...@4 could not be located in the dynamic
Thank you Bertalan. I did a search on c: drive for the .pdf file and cannot
locate it anywhere.
From: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
To: MING TSANG
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Fri, September 24, 2010 6:35:14 AM
Subject: Re: Jedit with lilypond tools
Pe
On 9/24/10 4:37 AM, "Patrick Schmidt" wrote:
> Carl,
>
> first of all thank you very much for your patch! I had a quick look
> at it on Rietveld and I'm stunned. I don't know how you managed to
> get all of this done in such a short period of time.
You're welcome. When one is really familiar w
Keith Ohara wrote:
> What are everyone's first impressions of 2.13.34, the alpha test?
Thanks for the review! And especially, thanks for testing it on some old
scores to make sure we don't have regressions.
> The auto-beaming has changed, and seems to beam a little less often than the
> old sy
Hello,
My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
\time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times 2/3 { f' g' a' }
The two triplets are grouped like one sextupplet, but with two 3's. What's the
problem? Is it a wrong practice in notation convention? Is it controlle
Doh!
Adobe doesn't seem to anti-alias raster images...
Should be"Adobe doesn't seem to anti-alias VECTOR images
Phil.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Burfitt"
To: "Trevor Daniels"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
Trevor, I've downloaded a number of PDF viewers for Windows and taken
screen
snapshots at 96dpi on Vista of each at 100% scaling (P
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> So I would conclude - if you need excellent screen display, you'll either
> need a carefully written PDF viewer, or a screen with a resolution of around
> 1000 dpi.
If anybody is seriously interested in this issue, then why not look at
the mai
Phil Burfitt wrote Friday, September 24, 2010 3:49 PM
Trevor, I've downloaded a number of PDF viewers for Windows and
taken screen
snapshots at 96dpi on Vista of each at 100% scaling (PNG
attachment).
Problems occur in all of them as to be expected as Lilyponds
output is
optimised for printe
On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:27 AM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Gets to the point of saying "Applying conversion:" and just stops
> --
Does the file compile when you try it in 2.13.34? It may be that there are no
changes which need to be made.
___
lilypond-use
On 2010-09-24 17:42, Phil Holmes wrote:
It's my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong, somebody) that LilyPond
is optimised neither for screen or print - it outputs as PDF, and so the
quality of the image seen depends on the quality of the program that
interprets the PDF. LilyPond is essentially
the following reply all did't go thru. Now I try again, just send ti lilypond
users.
- Forwarded Message
From: MING TSANG
To: Kaz Kylheku
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Fri, September 24, 2010 8:58:11 AM
Subject: Re: Help needed - missing .pdf file after running lilypond
sucessful
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:49:15 +0100, "Phil Burfitt"
wrote:
> Trevor, I've downloaded a number of PDF viewers for Windows and taken
> screen snapshots at 96dpi on Vista of each at 100% scaling (PNG
> attachment). Problems occur in all of them as to be expected as
> Lilyponds output is optimised for
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Phil Burfitt" ; "Trevor Daniels"
;
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
So I would conclude - if you need excell
Simply compiling and displaying the code you supplied gives 2 crochets and then
2 pairs of beamed triplets. It's not 6 notes beamed together. I'd guess that
you have over-ridden some beaming setting elsewhere in your score.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haip
Kaz Kylheku writes:
> For reference, I have here Adobe Reader 9.3.3 and Evince 2.30.3.
>
> I do see the bar lines over-extending past the staff lines.
> This must be a Lilypond bug.
Not at all.
> If that were a scaling artifact, it would be impossible to
> draw the letter T without the stem cro
On 9/24/10 9:25 AM, "胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng" wrote:
> Hello,
> My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
> \time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times 2/3 { f' g' a' }
> The two triplets are grouped like one sextupplet, but with two 3's. What's the
> problem? Is
Graham Percival wrote
PS if you want a hint, one of those discussions was in 2007.
Graham, Thanks for the pointer..had a chuckle with the continued discussion
2 years later. Pity the solution was never accepted/implemented, probably
not a very important issue then, but I believe it will b
Hi!
I have used Lilypondtool both on Windoze, and on Ubuntu, and the toolbar
immediately above the open file has little icons for everything you need.
One of them is a tiny sheet of paper representing the PDF option. Do you
have that on your version? If so, simply click that (once not twice) and
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Keith E OHara wrote:
> What are everyone's first impressions of 2.13.34, the alpha test?
>
> I remembered to run convert-ly (which worked for me, but I don't have MacOS
> 10.4, where James W ran into trouble) but it made very few changes to scores
> written for 2
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Burfitt"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
Graham Percival wrote
PS if you want a hint, one of those discussions was in 2007.
Graham, Thanks for the pointer..had a chuckle with the continued
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:31:09 +0100
> From: "Phil Holmes"
> Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
> To: "Graham Percival"
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <9fadf3787e2141f5b5d436db4e695...@advent>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>
My mother found a problem when I write continuous triplets. For example,
\time 4/4 c'4 c' \times 2/3 { c'8 d' e' } \times 2/3 { f' g' a' }
The two triplets are grouped like one sextupplet, but with two 3's. What's the
problem? Is it a wrong practice in notation convention? Is it controlled by
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 06:44:58PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Burfitt"
>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
>
>
> >>Graham Percival wrote
> >>PS if you want a hint, one of those discussions
Dear Dr. Tsang
You might want to check out
lilypond --help
Actually, I have met similar, (or more precisely, reverse,) problems
when I run 2.13.33 last month.
It seems, lilypond have output a pdf file, without a ps file as the ps
file was converted to pdf, when I run 2.13.33 last month, as
lily
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:41:24 -0700, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Keith E OHara wrote:
The horizontal spacing now quite aggressively tucks notes under/over the
accidentals of the following notes.
Do you consider this desirable? There are a couple bug reports about rela
Fr. Gordon,
The jedit version is 4.3.2; lilypond is v2.13.33. I see the viewer icon. I
single click it and it displays nothing. It is because the .pdf file is not
created even though the jedit console says it did generate a .pdf file.
Ming.
From: Father Go
Hullo all. I am doing some more of my traditional Orthodox Chant music, and
I have two systems of music representing 2 diff Prokeimena (psalm verses
chanted before the Epistle Reading). Above the second system, I need an
additional header (in the style of the first header, same font, size, etc.)
in
Sorry for the noise, it's my fault of not setting tupplet spanner duration in a
continuous triplets, not my example here.
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi, neuro:
I think you problem can be resolved. Please refer to vol94 issue 94 message 3
from Phil Holmes. If you are not absolutely need .ps, don't try.
My problem is after I added as suggested from Phil Holmes, I got the .ps file
and I lost .pdf file. I comment out the line "#(ly:set-opt
MING TSANG wrote Friday, September 24, 2010 7:56 PM
The jedit version is 4.3.2; lilypond is v2.13.33. I see the
viewer icon. I
single click it and it displays nothing. It is because the .pdf
file is not
created even though the jedit console says it did generate a .pdf
file.
Ghostscript is
Ming,
First of all see if your lilypond version is OK.
Click on the Windows Menu Button and Select the Run option. When the
window pops up type in cmd and click OK to start a terminal session.
The prompt should tell you you're in the "My Documents" directory for
your account.
Enter notepad test.ly
On 25 September 2010 00:07, Michael Dykes wrote:
>
> Hullo all. I am doing some more of my traditional Orthodox Chant music, and
> I have two systems of music representing 2 diff Prokeimena (psalm verses
> chanted before the Epistle Reading). Above the second system, I need an
> additional header
Ming,
On 24/09/10 23:15, MING TSANG wrote:
> Hi, neuro:
>
> I think you problem can be resolved. Please refer to vol94 issue 94 message 3
> from Phil Holmes. If you are not absolutely need .ps, don't try.
>
>
> My problem is after I added as suggested from Phil Holmes, I got the .ps file
>
Hello,
I'm very glad that 2.13.34 is much better than previous devel versions since
2.13.24. The only shortcoming is, however, still spacing. In my case, the
overture uses 35 pages in 2.13.24, while 37 in 2.13.34, with one "couldn't fit
music on page:" warning in the middle. I don't know which
45 matches
Mail list logo
