>> @ David: What I'm not quite sure about yet: Do you - in general -
>> think the font glyph should or should not be used?
>
> I think that the font should provide the minimally acceptable
> hyphen.
I second that.
> If it gets shorter than that, no hyphen should be used at all.
Yep.
> Whether
On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 09:14 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> @ David: What I'm not quite sure about yet: Do you - in general -
> >> think the font glyph should or should not be used?
> > I think that the font should provide the minimally acceptable
> > hyphen.
> I second that.
I'd say that minimally accept
"Dmytro O. Redchuk" writes:
> On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 09:14 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> >> @ David: What I'm not quite sure about yet: Do you - in general -
>> >> think the font glyph should or should not be used?
>> > I think that the font should provide the minimally acceptable
>> > hyphen.
>> I secon
On 2010-09-03 00:54, James Wilkinson wrote:
Jay Anderson wrote:
If you want it to apply globally here's probably what you're wanting
to do:
\version "2.13.31"
\layout
{
\context
{
\Score
\override BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t)
}
}
\score
{
<<
\new Staff
{
\r
On 2010-09-03 10:09, David Kastrup wrote:
"Dmytro O. Redchuk" writes:
On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 09:14 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
@ David: What I'm not quite sure about yet: Do you - in general -
think the font glyph should or should not be used?
I think that the font should provide the minimally accepta
Hello Lilypond community!
I am typesetting a piano score, and when I put a staccato dot to an eigth
note, this is placed on the opposite side of the stem.
Can I put it on the same side of the stem?
I mean, is there any instruction like
"staccatoUp--staccatoDown--staccatoNeuter" or something si
fauban writes:
> Hello Lilypond community!
>
> I am typesetting a piano score, and when I put a staccato dot to an eigth
> note, this is placed on the opposite side of the stem.
>
> Can I put it on the same side of the stem?
>
> I mean, is there any instruction like
> "staccatoUp--staccatoDown--
>> > I think that the font should provide the minimally acceptable
>> > hyphen.
>
> I'd say that minimally acceptable for lyrics is far too short for
> text (and acceptable for text is too long for lyrics).
I disagree. A hyphen is a hyphen is a hyphen, so to say. It must has
the font's default h
On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 10:09 David Kastrup wrote:
> "Dmytro O. Redchuk" writes:
> > acceptable for text is too long for lyrics).
>
> Text does not have variable length hyphens. Dashes of various length
> carry different meanings in text: hyphen, range dashes, ellipsis.
Yes, i knew that: -, –, — (or
On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 10:47 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > I'd say that minimally acceptable for lyrics is far too short for
> > text (and acceptable for text is too long for lyrics).
>
> I disagree. A hyphen is a hyphen is a hyphen, so to say. It must has
> the font's default hyphen length and must no
On 2010-09-03 10:50, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 10:09 David Kastrup wrote:
Obviously (to me), different character slots are required for the
extensible hyphens in lyrics, and a text hyphen. A long lyric hyphen,
for example, can't have the thickness of a normal text hyphen, or
David Kastrup wrote:
>
>
>
> If you want a certain direction, just use ^ or _ for attaching the
> articulation rather than -.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
Fantastic!
Thanks!!
PS. If this appears in the Learning Manual, it must be in a secret place, it
could be placed in the articulations c
Alexander Kobel writes:
> On 2010-09-03 10:50, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
>> On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 10:09 David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Obviously (to me), different character slots are required for the
>>> extensible hyphens in lyrics, and a text hyphen. A long lyric hyphen,
>>> for example, can't have th
When you reply to someone who has replied to your newsgroup question, please
use "Reply All" to ensure the reply also goes to the newsgroup.
I think others have answered your question about the midi - you have a
decrescendo which causes the music to die away.
Your version number says you're usi
- Original Message -
From: "fauban"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: Placing artilulations (staccato, accent...): Up, Down,
Neutral,etc.
David Kastrup wrote:
If you want a certain direction, just use ^ or _ for attaching the
articulation rather than
Hello!
Using the musicxml2ly command, I have created a lilypond file containing a
piano Score. However, it needed many corrections and lacked dynamics.
I have seen a Template here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano-templates.html
that could make a score w
Greetings -
I'm running LilyPond on Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala).
I'd like to run convert-ly against all of my .ly files that I have created,
without having to manually change directories to each directory that
contains a file I want to convert, and then run convert-ly against the files
in that dir
Ferran Auban wrote:
>
>
> I have seen a Template here:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano-templates.html
>
>
> that could make a score with centered dynamics. However, my score
> definition (a piano Staff with 2 staves and 2 voices each) is completely
I'm not sure at all... maybe you can use find?
Something like that:
cd path/to/dir
find -name '*.ly' -exec convert-ly {} \;
Cheers,
Federico
2010/9/3 Ralph Palmer
> Greetings -
>
> I'm running LilyPond on Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala).
>
> I'd like to run convert-ly against all of my .ly files th
Hello.
> I'm running LilyPond on Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala).
>
> I'd like to run convert-ly against all of my .ly files that I have created,
> without having to manually change directories to each directory that
> contains a file I want to convert, and then run convert-ly against the files
> in t
On Fri 03 Sep 2010, 07:39 Ralph Palmer wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I'm running LilyPond on Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala).
>
> I'd like to run convert-ly against all of my .ly files that I have created,
> without having to manually change directories to each directory that
> contains a file I want to co
Dear Ralph,
I just wrote two versions using bash. They are untested. Better copy the
whole directory to a backup place before starting
(cp -a . ../)
First version is based on directories. For every directory within the
current directory (including this directory itself) it converts all files
mat
Dear community,
I want to create a customized drumstaff for four toms.
What I don't understand: in the below quoted snippet the positions of the
last three drum notes are the same.
Why is it so and how can I change it?
\version "2.12.2"
%%% four Toms
#(define fourtoms '((hightom default #t 4)
Phil: the "\teeny \flat" works. I also check 2.12.3 lilypond_notation there
is no "accidentals.M2" (v2.6.6 has) but there is "accidentals.medicaeaM1" .
Anyway I like the \teeny \flat better.
Kaz: I think there is a problem for "c2\> d\!" construct for midi output.
Please refer tored and
Hello List
I'd like to notate some music in which small groups of bars are surrounded by
whitespace (or invisible bars). I'm after something notationally not that
different to the score of Terry Riley's "In C":
http://artsaha.analogartsensemble.net/Texts/InC.jpg.
I've taken the "staff-container
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:16:06AM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> But this makes me wonder: I vaguely remember a distinction of \score
> and \new Score, which I can't find in the docs.
The distinction is that \new Score should not be used, and issue
1033 is to remove it entirely from the docs.
C
Maybe it's because you've put in a decrescendo, which is not followed
by any other dynamics to restore the volume!
Try adding, say, mf for
mezzo-forte after the decrescendo.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:00:30 -0700
(PDT), MING TSANG wrote:
Kaz: I think there is a problem for "c2>
d!" construct
-Eluze wrote:
>
> what is so different with your code?
>
> if you follow the templates' example you should get it:
>
> dynamics = { … }
>
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff = "PianoStaff_pf" <<
> \new Staff = "Staff_pfUpper" << \global \upper >>
> \new Dynamics = "Dynamics_pf" \dynamics
Thank you, Kaz:
By adding \mf to bar 14 after the "cresc." on bar 13, I can hear bass notes
to
the end now. I have to remember this whenever I code/use "cresc.".
From: Kaz Kylheku
To: MING TSANG
Cc: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Fri, Septembe
On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Reg Ludions wrote:
> Hello List
>
> I'd like to notate some music in which small groups of bars are surrounded by
> whitespace (or invisible bars). I'm after something notationally not that
> different to the score of Terry Riley's "In C":
> http://artsaha.analogart
Ferran Auban wrote:
>
>
> -Eluze wrote:
>>
>> what is so different with your code?
>>
>> if you follow the templates' example you should get it:
>>
>> dynamics = { … }
>>
>> \score {
>> \new PianoStaff = "PianoStaff_pf" <<
>> \new Staff = "Staff_pfUpper" << \global \upper >>
>> \
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 23:59:23 John Zaitseff wrote:
> A very quick and simple question that has me stumped: How do I enter
> the chord "B(add4)/G#" in LilyPond's chord mode? I am trying to
> transcribe that very chord in a song we have...
>
> I am quite adept at using LilyPond, but my kn
Hi, I'm trying to create tablature for guitar from regular notes. I
have a piece with chords and melody, formatted for a piano staff.
For conversion to tablature, Lilypond guesses the string and fret to
play the note on. This may lead to two or more notes on the same
string on different frets
Hello,
I'm working on a bunch of music for dance class accompanying. It is
very useful to have a mark above the barline every 8 measures. (Right
now, I go through my paper scores and make a pencil slash above the
barline every 8 measures for every piece I play.)
With Lilypond is there any way to
\version "2.13.32"
<<
\relative c' { \repeat unfold 64 { a b c d } }
{ \repeat unfold 8 { \mark "foo" s1*8 } }
>>
The only Scheme programming you'd need is if you didn't know exactly how
long the piece was, in which case there's a function ly:music-length that'll
get you the length of a snippet o
Hello,
As far as I can tell, the automatic staff changing feature only works by
assigning a voice to a given staff ("up" or "down"). Say now that in your
voice you have chords, some notes of which should be on the upper staff
and others on the lower. It seems as though it's not currently possible
I'm getting a seg. fault with 2.13.32. I haven't got the exact cause
yet but one variable is that I only see the fault when I add a second
\new Staff in a StaffGroup. I have two parts based on the same score
which both succeed when I delete the second staff. I have also attached
a verbose ou
I notice on the download page that the Ubuntu version shown for Lilypond
2.12 is two releases behind (shows Jaunty whereas the current stable
Ubuntu is Lucid), and the included version in the current distribution
is 2.12.3 and not 2.12.1...
Nick
___
38 matches
Mail list logo
