In message , Paul
Scott writes
On Apr 3, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message
<7ca3d5a30904031519ya3b89hb87cf8f81a544...@mail.gmail.com>, Neil
Puttock writes
2009/4/3 Anthony W. Youngman :
In message , Anthony W.
Youngman
writes
Ow!
Sorry, reading this was painful
In message , Paul
Scott writes
I don't see how the physics would work to give you a quarter-
wavelength as you claim.
I just did some quick online research and he is right. A tube closed
on one end like a clarinet or trumpet has a wavelength that is four
times the length of the tube. A fl
Is it possible, in a chord containing a second, to specify which note in the
second should appear to the left of the stem and which to the right? The
order of the notes doesn't change anything - ie and
both have D to the left and E to the right.
Nick
__
Hi Nick,
Is it possible, in a chord containing a second, to specify which
note in the
second should appear to the left of the stem and which to the
right? The
order of the notes doesn't change anything - ie and gis,>
both have D to the left and E to the right.
My guess is, use the \tweak
Hi,
I am having some problems when trying to import pdf or ps files
generated from Lilypond into Illustrator... some fonts are not found...
Also when I send some pdfs to be printed in Windows machines with
Acrobat, the dynamics fonts are not found...
It seems to be related to how Adobe apps work
Therefore, by definition, all blown > musical instruments will have a
fundamental frequency of 2L.
Hi,
not quite: clarinets sound an octave lower than you would expect when you
regard their length.
They behave like stopped organ pipes. I don't know exactly why -- it comes
from their cylindr
Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> writes:
>
> IMHO, this is visually unattractive while reading a lilypond source
> and takes far too much time to enter. I really can't understand why
> there is so much resistance to a one-letter chord repeat item --
> ideally an unused letter like `q' or another ascii ch
On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
On Apr 4, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Henning Plumeyer wrote:
Therefore, by definition, all blown > musical instruments will
have a fundamental frequency of 2L.
Hi,
not quite: clarinets sound an octave lower than you would expect
when you regard
Good evening List,
The snippet below shows two c naturals tied across a barline, followed by a c
natural slurred to a c sharp across a barline.
Lilypond makes both look identical. I think the first is right (born out by the
NR) - but is the second?
I know I can force the sharp or add a caution
Op vrijdag 03 april 2009, schreef David Stocker:
> It would be great if there was a
> shorthand for this in LilyPond code for situations (like in many forms
> of popular music) an accompaniment pattern consists of many repeated
> chords--perhaps something like ""--simply instructing LilyPond to
>
Sorry - forgot to attach the pdf.
--- Original Message ---
From: David Pounder
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: 4.4.09, 20:43:19
Subject: Slur/Tie Ambiguity
Good evening List,
The snippet below shows two c naturals tied across a barline, followed by a c
natural slurred to a c sharp acro
Hi David,
Good evening List,
The snippet below shows two c naturals tied across a barline,
followed by a c natural slurred to a c sharp across a barline.
Lilypond makes both look identical. I think the first is right
(born out by the NR) - but is the second?
I know I can force the sharp or a
On 4 Apr 2009, at 19:32, Henning Plumeyer wrote:
Therefore, by definition, all blown > musical instruments will have
a fundamental frequency of 2L.
Hi,
not quite: clarinets sound an octave lower than you would expect
when you regard their length.
They behave like stopped organ pipes. I don'
2009/4/4 Nick Payne :
> When I look at the present entry for that in define-grobs.scm (LP 2.12.2), it
> is:
>
> (meta . ((class . Spanner)
> (object-callbacks . ((normal-stems . ,ly:beam::calc-normal-stems)))
> (interfaces . (staff-symbol-referencer-interface
>
2009/4/3 Francisco Vila :
> Looking further for a solution, we saw that the definition of textLengthOn
>
> textLengthOn = {
> \override TextScript #'extra-spacing-width = #'(0 . 0)
> \override TextScript #'extra-spacing-height = #'(-inf.0 . +inf.0)
> }
>
> now the problem is to find what type of
Ok, thanks. I tried that, and for a simple example it fixes the problem. But in
an actual score with lots of barring indications of various sorts, you get to a
situation where a staff runs off the right-hand edge of the page because there
are many consecutive bars where a line can't be broken wi
2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
> Anybody willing to take this on as a patch? It shouldn't be too hard, but I
> imagine it'll take some time grepping through the source files.
If we agree that it's just a case of changing the default velocity,
then this is ideally suited to a Frog; on the other hand
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> Yet another alternative is to let LilyPond do the job, either using
>> simple techniques like \repeat unfold {} or Scheme based
>> solutions like http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=390,
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=390 or
>>
> As far as the exact syntax is concerned would it be possible to just
> use no character at all?
>
> c4 2 8. 16
Aah, indeed this looks optimal! Han-Wen?
> We would probably still want a repeat character for when '\repeat
> unfold' is too long:
>
> c4 & & &
Following your first idea, `c4 4 4
I am trying to move 'Fine' just a bit to the left and am using this markup -
\once \property Voice.TextScript \override #'extra-offset = #'(2 . -5)
What I want is the 'Fine' over the double bar -
R2*31 \bar "||"
\once \property Voice.TextScript \override #'extra-offset = #'(2 . -5)
R2^"Fine"
b
> You could adapt the parser so it stores simple_elements (or whatever
> they are called) in a variable automatically (say 'r'), and you can
> repeat things using \r. This could also be the implementation
> mechanism for default durations.
This still needs two characters -- and would it be possi
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> As far as the exact syntax is concerned would it be possible to just
>> use no character at all?
>>
>> c4 2 8. 16
>
> Aah, indeed this looks optimal! Han-Wen?
This looks like a syntactic nightmare. You are suggesting
c4 c 4 -> c4 c4 c
Nick Payne wrote:
You can use tweak:
R2-\tweak #'extra-offset #'(2 . 0)^\markup { Fine }
Nick
Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately it is not working. The word
Fine just stays put over the rest, no matter what numbers I put in there.
--
Chip
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-u
You can use tweak:
R2-\tweak #'extra-offset #'(2 . 0)^\markup { Fine }
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Chip
> Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:32
>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> As for LilyPond vs. Sibelius: if we do it, we should do it
> objectively. One thing we might do in the new website is to have
> examples of notation from the latest software (lilypond stable,
> finale 20XY, sibelius 20AB, etc) and point o
On 4/4/09 4:21 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
>
>> Anybody willing to take this on as a patch? It shouldn't be too hard, but I
>> imagine it'll take some time grepping through the source files.
>
> If we agree that it's just a case of changing the default velocity,
Chip:
The word Fine just stays put over the rest, no matter what numbers
I put in there.
I think you're looking for MultiMeasureRestText, not TextScript.
HTH!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Chip:
The word Fine just stays put over the rest, no matter what numbers I
put in there.
I think you're looking for MultiMeasureRestText, not TextScript.
HTH!
Kieren.
Thanks for the reply. Doesn't matter what I put in there - when I run it
I get an error that it does
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:04:25PM -0700, Chip wrote:
> Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Chip:
>>
>>> The word Fine just stays put over the rest, no matter what numbers I
>>> put in there.
>>
>> I think you're looking for MultiMeasureRestText, not TextScript.
>>
>> HTH!
>> Kieren.
> Thanks for the repl
Got it working, the order of the whole thing was wrong. Here's how it
should be -
R2*31 \bar "||"
\once \override Voice.MultiMeasureRestText #'extra-offset = #'(-7 . 1)
R2^"Fine"
Leave out the \property, move \override before the Voice. Now I have the
Fine centered over the double bar.
Than
Hello,
I sent this mail yesterday with the graphics attached, but it did not
appear in the mailing list. I resend it with an link to the graphic at a
web server. Hope this passes the moderation.
I write a piece with where are a lot of triplets in one variation. It
looks nice to have the beam
> This looks like a syntactic nightmare. You are suggesting
>
> c4 c 4 -> c4 c4 c4
>
> i.e. making white space syntactically significant.
Honestly, this would be OK with me. How many users are aware that
`c 4' is the same as `c4' (I wasn't, BTW)? Is this ever documented?
Do we have a singl
32 matches
Mail list logo