> This looks like a syntactic nightmare. You are suggesting
>
> c4 c 4 -> c4 c4 c4
>
> i.e. making white space syntactically significant.
Honestly, this would be OK with me. How many users are aware that
`c 4' is the same as `c4' (I wasn't, BTW)? Is this ever documented?
Do we have a single example which makes use of this syntactic
possibility?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
