I am using Windows XP with LP v.2.10.23
The song I am entering to transpose for a grandson (breaking voice) has a
phrasing slur from a note in the bass staff ending on a note in the treble but
not one belonging to the two voices already there or either of the two voices
in the bass. Could anyon
2008/1/12, Ossie Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am using Windows XP with LP v.2.10.23
>
> The song I am entering to transpose for a grandson (breaking voice) has a
> phrasing slur from a note in the bass staff ending on a note in the treble but
> not one belonging to the two voices already there o
thank you very much, now I understand how it works- unfortunatly I
need the note to be tied ~ like below
and that does not work - but maybe that's a tall order...
best
ole
%%
staffClassicalGuitar = {c'4 c' c' c'}
staffClassicalGuitarII = {g'4 g' g'~ \change
Le samedi 12 janvier 2008 à 01:57 +, Erik Ronström a écrit :
> (since I can't make
> pdflatex work with my generated tex files from lilypond-book, I have to
> use dvips)
This is not true: if you replace --psfonts lilypond-book option with
--pdf, you'll get a LaTeX document to be processed by p
Hello, I am new to LilyPond
Welcome !!!
I want to place the page number on the left side of the header on
every page, but I want to center the title.
Something like that ?
%%
\version "2.11.34"
music = \repeat "unfold" 1000 c'
\header { title = "Title"}
\paper {
Ole Schmidt skrev:
thank you very much, now I understand how it works- unfortunatly I need
the note to be tied ~ like below
Hmm, that's a bug. I have reported it on the bug-list.
-Rune
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://li
> if you replace --psfonts lilypond-book option with
> --pdf, you'll get a LaTeX document to be processed by pdflatex. I
> recently changed lilypond-book doc to explain clearly both ways (via
> latex/dvips/ps2pdf or via pdflatex) and encourage new users use
> [...]
Oh! Very good! Many thanks!! To
Hello,
Many thanks to the developers who made it possible to work with
Arpeggios over different voices. It works very well...
Except in 2.11.37 when fingering is applied to part of the chord. Then
the arpeggio mark is moved to the previous bar as in this almost
minimal example:
Arpeggio
2008/1/12, Arjan Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This only occurs when the arpeggio mark applies to a chord with
> fingering in it and when that same arpeggio mark spans two or more
> voices. Are there any ideas on this list on how to prevent it?
Thanks, this bug has been added as
http://code.google.c
Hi,
I'm creating instrumental scores for a large work, where some instruments are
quiet during some pieces. Now, for the empty pieces, I also want to add the
score title to the instrumental pieces, but lilypond does not print them when
the score does not contain any music.
How can I force the sc
Hi Reinhold,
Since you already know what the titles look like (i.e., you've
manually defined the style!), just add a similar \markup.
See example, attached.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
_
\version "2.11.35"
% #(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape)
#(set-default-pa
Can I use something like outside-staff-priority to get fermataMarkup to
be closer to the note than the markup? It would be great if
fermataMarkup behaved more like fermata.
\version "2.11.36"
global = { s4*0^\markup{ Tempo indication } }
\score {
<<
\new Staff <<
\global
{ r1\f
I'm having a piece with each vocal voice split into two, which are printed on
the same staff. As I only want to print dynamics, articulations etc. once, I
simply remove the corresponding engravers from the second voice. However, I
have not been able to find the proper engraver for the \fermataMa
Why not just leave the fermata (and everything else that you
don't want) out of mII? Or am I missing something?
Trevor D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Reinhold Kainhofer
> Sent: 12 Janu
Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Why not just leave the fermata (and everything else that you
> don't want) out of mII?
Because I'm also creating one score for the second voice alone, so each voice
needs to have the full dynamics/articulations/ornaments... (And as these are
2008/1/12, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm having a piece with each vocal voice split into two, which are printed on
> the same staff. As I only want to print dynamics, articulations etc. once, I
> simply remove the corresponding engravers from the second voice. However, I
> have not
I am attempting to transpose a victoria piece from CPDL which is written in
Lilypond (http://www.upv.es/coro/victoria/ly/Vadam_Et_Circuibo_Civitatem.ly) the
PDf is http://www.upv.es/coro/victoria/pdf/Vadam_Et_Circuibo_Civitatem.pdf.
I am using 2.11.something and have had to mess around with the L
Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> A possible solution would be to temporarily redefine the
> \fermataMarkup shortcut.
>
> As you can see in property-init.ly, it is defined as follows:
>
> fermataMarkup = \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata" }
>
> Why not temporarily define it as :
>
dear all,
is it a normal behaviour that the \clef percussion transposes like in
the following snippet?
\new Staff {
\clef percussion
{ c' d' e' f' g' }
%%%
thanks for a hint
ole
__
Ole Schmidt skrev:
is it a normal behaviour that the \clef percussion transposes like in
the following snippet?
It does not transpose. It behaves like a C clef.
What did you expect?
Did you read the section about percussion notation in the nr?
-Rune
_
when I compile the following snippet I get what you can see in the
pdf...
\version "2.11.36"
testfile = \new Staff {
\time 4/4
\clef percussion
{ c d e f g a b c
} }
testfileZwei = \new Staff {
\time 4/4
{\clef percussion c d e f g a b c
} }
\score {
<<
I looks like it treats percussion like alto clef with middle C on
the center line.
alto clef is so hard to read :)
This is possibly related to
Showing melody rhythms
in Section 2.4.1 in the documentation.
why? in which way?
ole
Ole Schmidt wrote:
I looks like it treats percussion like alto clef with middle C on the
center line.
alto clef is so hard to read :)
What instruments are you writing for that need pitches and also need
percussion staff.
This is possibly related to
Showing melody rhythms
Ole Schmidt wrote:
dear all,
is it a normal behaviour that the \clef percussion transposes like in
the following snippet?
\new Staff {
\clef percussion
{ c' d' e' f' g' }
%%%
What version?
What were you trying to write?
I look
What instruments are you writing for that need pitches and also
need percussion staff.
I write for "Schlitztrommel" which is a tuned percussion instrument
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
Ole Schmidt skrev:
when I compile the following snippet I get what you can see in the pdf...
It does not transpose. It behaves like a C clef.
Yep.
As I said, it behaves as a C-clef (having central c on the middle line).
If you are using a tuned percussion instrument then you should not use
Ole Schmidt wrote:
I write for "Schlitztrommel" which is a tuned percussion instrument
I recognize the instrument but I don't know how to write for it. Does
it not use a normal treble or bass clef?
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-us
oh, I missunderstood that, I confused C with G (treble with alto) clef..
that "Schlitztrommel" is not really tuned...
Am 13.01.2008 um 01:35 schrieb Rune Zedeler:
Ole Schmidt skrev:
when I compile the following snippet I get what you can see in the
pdf...
It does not transpose. It behaves
Hi, Valentin.
Ended up doing it less elegantly, not changing staff but using four leger
lines.
The example as given in the LSR & also examlpes in the manual for changing
staff do not fit the pattern given in Template D.2.2 'Piano and melody with
lyrics. Could the LSR example be modified to fit
Hi, Valentin.
Ended up doing it less elegantly, not changing staff but using four leger
lines.
The example as given in the LSR & also examples in the manual for changing
staff can not be used with Template D.2.2 'Piano and melody with lyrics.
Could the LSR example code be modified to confor
Hi and thank you for developing such an interesting project.
I use a Mac with OsX 10.5.
I downloaded Lilypond for Mac 2.10.33 and decompressed the .tar file.
The application seemed to install fine and opened when double-clicked.
A small text file opened as well instructing me to save it and ..
I have a time change (from 6/2 to 9/4), and at the time change I have the
markup:
\markup {
\smaller \note #"2" #1 "=" \smaller \note #"2." #1
}
above the first note in the new time signature. But I'd like to shift the
entire markup to the left and up (ideally, I'd like the = sign to sit ove
I've worked ahead on this piece of music and found that perhaps the
problem is not where it thought that it was.
What I saw as a single bar line in the middle of a bar is actually an
extra bar who's ending bar line I could not see (yet). As soon as I
attempted to move into the next section, the en
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:45:45PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> You may get rid off LaTeX and use LilyPond only, for instance with the
> help of
> this titling stylesheet:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=368
Newbie:
Please, I have tried this with the result:
GNU LilyPond 2.11.33
Pro
34 matches
Mail list logo
