Yes, I realize that this has nothing to do with Lilypond - with the
exception that the following essay explains *why* I have placed my
scores under a copyleft license. The scores to two of my songs are
engraved with Lilypond, with the rest to follow soon.
I'm working on a new CD jewel case in
2007/11/5, Michael David Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, I realize that this has nothing to do with Lilypond - with the
> exception that the following essay explains *why* I have placed my
> scores under a copyleft license. The scores to two of my songs are
> engraved with Lilypond, with the
Valentin Villenave wrote:
> how is this text itself licensed? Would you mind if I translate it
> into French, and post it on my own website (with full credits, and a
> bunch of links to your website, of course)?
Hi,
That's a complicated question.
Generally, I place works expressing my personal
If you refer to the reminder of the new key signature at the end of the
previous line,
that's a common typesetting convention (which is why LilyPond does it
this way).
If you want to use some other typesetting convention, you can turn this
off.
To find out how, go to www.lilypond.org -> Documen
On 04.11.2007 (01:23), Graham Percival wrote:
> Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> >Sorry - my fault, I was thinking of the Program Usage, which to a large
> >extent has to do with how to write code to produce a certain output (the
> >LP-book part) leaving bits and pieces which not necessarily belongs
> >toge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
> Bonjour,
>
>
>
> Voici le texte entier de mon problème: toto.ly
>
>
>
> Et voici ce qu'il me génère : toto.log
>
>
>
> J'ai beau repasser tout cela dans ma tête et feuilleter la doc, je ne
> m'en sors pas. Est-ce que qqn peut m'aider a comprendre pourquoi cela
Hope this is not too late to be of use.
Graham Percival wrote on 03 November 2007 06:55
>
> I've decided to do the rest of the first drafts right now.
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
>
> Here's the TODO list.
>
>
> Educational notation
Was Educational use; name change?
Quite a lot in this sectio
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Hope this is not too late to be of use.
No, not at all.
Educational notation
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name change.
Quite a lot in this section is not really
educational notation or use. Coul
Am 2007-11-04 um 22:46 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
What LilyPond version do you use?
2.10.29
I don't have the time now to make dummy definitions of all your
variables, so I have not done any trial and error. However, I would
first try something along the lines of
Sorry, I forgot to provide a mi
Graham Percival wrote:
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name
change.
It seems to me that much of what's in this section could be classed as
"editorial" rather than simply "educational". So what about "Editorial
Notation" or
Brett Duncan wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name
change.
It seems to me that much of what's in this section could be classed as
"editorial" rather than simply "educational". So what about "Ed
Dear All,
I am a new Lilypond user. I have processed some single staff scores, and
found the transpose function
quite easy and useful. I had a problem with collisions between grobs and
notes but discovered how to use
the padding to move things, thanks to some advice. This was on OpenSuse
10.2 usi
Hi everybody,
I'm typesetting a Brahms exercise for my pupils, using \autochange (it
would be quite annoying to have to do the staff changes manually).
But I do have a problem with the Fingerings. Not only do they *not*
follow the notes (particularly the left hand), but they also mess up
the beam
13 matches
Mail list logo
