Robert Memering writes:
> My problem:
>
> - I have SuSE 9.3, lilypond 2.4.4.
> - Lilypond works, dvi and midi output is fine.
> - The integrated production of ps and pdf fails.
SUSE ships a broken LilyPond installation. Did you think of Solution:
report bug to SUSE?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Recently there's been some discussion about helping with the docs.
Great!
If you're interested, please see this page:
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/documentation-adding
In other words, the only thing you need to do is send an email. I've
tried to
make it as easy as possible to
Robert Memering wrote:
- I have SuSE 9.3, lilypond 2.4.4.
- Lilypond works, dvi and midi output is fine.
- The integrated production of ps and pdf fails. I get documents
with many musical symbols missing and all wrong text fonts.
- invoking dvips (and ps2pdf) manually works, but produces very
ba
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 06:27 schrieb Tapio Tuovila:
> I'd like to second Graham's opinion. Compiling 2.5.2x goes smoothly on
> suse 9.3; at least I have noticed no particular problem. And once you
> use 2.5.x you need not worry about dvips -sort of things.
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 o
Well this seems to imply: "forget being able to build
a lilypond file from scratch, you must start from a
template or all is lost."
Infact for the majority of my Lilypond experience I
relied on templates for creating scores.
What this did was limit my ability to make a score do
exactly what I wan
Robert Memering wrote:
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are
right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use,
because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I
still have several problems. One score doesn't compile, and the
other ones have
Thanks
I saw.
I am still trying to figure out if there are required
elements in a lilypond file and if they must occur in
a certain place or not.
I started writing a file structure section for the
docs but am stuck on this.
Aaron
--- Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently there's
On 4-Jun-05, at 1:07 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
I am still trying to figure out if there are required
elements in a lilypond file
You need a score. It can be explicit,
\score{
blah blah
}
or you can use a shortcut
{
c'4
blah blah
}
which adds the \score{} part automatically.
and if they must o
On 4-Jun-05, at 12:47 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
So in the 2.4 series lilypond I was eventually able to
create my own template. Still I was never exactly sure
why it worked and others I tried didn't...
Why can't you use your 2.4 scores in 2.5? You might need
to update them with convert-ly, but the
On 4-Jun-05, at 10:25 AM, Robert Memering wrote:
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are
right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use,
because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I
still have several problems. One score doesn't compil
Ok I finally got it the shortcut {} was making me
crazy.
So a first rule is every lilypond file must have a
score block. Its correlary is that it can be written
out or in a shortcut.
Great.
Now I will go back to the other thread for other
questions so as not to confuse me and anyone else.
Thank
Hi Graham and list,
I did as you said and did a convert-ly on the file.
it basically replaced paper with layout and removed
the notes block but I see a second set of brackets.
--
\version "2.2.0"
\header{
title = "Zachrenu"
poet = "
Mats -
With your pointers, I've made significant progress. Three anomalies remain.
A) The big aha: text size is controlled with, e.g.
\override DynamicTextSpanner #'font-size = # 6
but dotted- and dashed-lines aren't scaled.
B) Got the \markup thing working, almost. In
\set decrescendoText
On 4-Jun-05, at 4:31 PM, Aaron Mehl wrote:
So am I able to generalize from this that layout
replaces paper (you said not and the docs still say
that paper is still in?)
There is currently a \paper{} and \layout{}. I really don't
want to talk about anything that happened before 2.4, because
I
> I don't know. I don't write music with lyrics.
> Let's look at the
> docs... Instrument-specific notation -> Vocal music.
Why not look a lyrics which is what I did and I got
the following: And I couldn't figure out where to put
it because I go an x =y situation again. Remember you
know where
I installed 2.5.27 on WinXP box and it worked fine but it fails
to generate PNG files :( I have python installed and 2.4.2 works okay.
When I tried to find out what happens I found that file lilylib.py
is missing. I tried to place an old lilylib.py from 2.4.2 there but
it did not work. And
Slur crosses decrescendo mark
http://www.soprano-recorder.ru/tmp/question.gif :
fis2( _\markup { " " \column { " " \italic \dynamic "p" } } \> g4) _\markup {
" " \column { " " \italic \dynamic "pp" } } \! r4 |
\bar "|."
I used \markup because if I use \p and \pp things get hairy...
http://
On 4-Jun-05, at 10:36 PM, Roman V. Isaev wrote:
Slur crosses decrescendo mark
What is the proper method to solve this problem?
Increase the #'padding property. See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
Common-tweaks.html
(I normally set it to #1.5 , if that lo
Robert Memering kirjoitti:
compilation went quite smoothly.
at least I'm glad about this.
But it is not much use,
because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I
still have several problems. One score doesn't compile, and the
other ones have one-line-staves instead of five-li
On 06/04, Graham Percival wrote:
> On 4-Jun-05, at 10:36 PM, Roman V. Isaev wrote:
> >Slur crosses decrescendo mark
> >What is the proper method to solve this problem?
> Increase the #'padding property. See
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
> Common-tweaks.html
>
During conversion it marks files as \version "2.5.25" Is it okay?..
--
Roman V. Isaev http://www.soprano-recorder.ru Moscow, Russia
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-
21 matches
Mail list logo
