Re: tied sharps after line break

Ah I see. Yes that's the one. Op zondag 3 maart 2024 om 18:21:59 +00:00:00 schreef Werner LEMBERG : 2. LilyPond's default behaviour in this situation is (in my opinion) sub-optimal. It's a bug known since 15 years... Werner

Re: tied sharps after line break

> 2. LilyPond's default behaviour in this situation is (in my opinion) > sub-optimal. It's a bug known since 15 years... https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/649 Werner

Re: tied sharps after line break

Op zondag 3 maart 2024 om 18:58:45 +01:00:00 schreef Hans Aikema : Does not yet cover the case Martin was looking for - omitting the second accidental in a situation of a line-break on a tied accidental. Can be done however by an explicit \omit, which should be only \once, because otherwise it

Re: tied sharps after line break

Does not yet cover the case Martin was looking for - omitting the second accidental in a situation of a line-break on a tied accidental. Can be done however by an explicit \omit, which should be only \once, because otherwise it would omit accidentals from that point onwards. The correct renderi

Re: tied sharps after line break

I had this yesterday, wasn’t immediately obvious butAccidentals (LilyPond Notation Reference)lilypond.orghthDamianOn 3 Mar 2024, at 17:39, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:Op zondag 3 maart 2024 om 18:33:26 +01:00:00 schreef Hans Aikema :On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:26, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:Hi LilyPonders,I

Re: tied sharps after line break

Op zondag 3 maart 2024 om 18:33:26 +01:00:00 schreef Hans Aikema : On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:26, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:  Hi LilyPonders, I bumped into a situation similar to this tiny example (In the real score the linebreak happened at such a situation without a forced \break but the

Re: tied sharps after line break

> On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:26, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > >  > Hi LilyPonders, > > I bumped into a situation similar to this tiny example (In the real score the > linebreak happened at such a situation without a forced \break but the result > was the same): > > \relative c' { > c4 c c cis

tied sharps after line break

Hi LilyPonders, I bumped into a situation similar to this tiny example (In the real score the linebreak happened at such a situation without a forced \break but the result was the same): \relative c' { c4 c c *cis* *~* | \break *cis* *cis* cis d | } the sharp sign in the 2nd bar is