Re: tied sharps after line break

[Damian leGassick]

I had this yesterday, wasn’t immediately obvious but Accidentals (LilyPond Notation Reference) lilypond.org hth Damian On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:39, Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarensk...@kpnmail.nl> wrote:  Op zondag 3 maart 2024 om 18:33:26 +01:00:00 schreef Hans Aikema <hans.aik...@aikebah.net>: On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:26, Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarensk...@kpnmail.nl> wrote:  Hi LilyPonders, I bumped into a situation similar to this tiny example (In the real score the linebreak happened at such a situation without a forced \break but the result was the same): \relative c' { c4 c c cis ~ | \break cis cis cis d | } the sharp sign in the 2nd bar is printed twice. I am not sure if that's the correct behaviour? Without a \break the sharp is not printed for the tied 1st cis in the 2nd bar, and only repeated for the 2nd cis in the 2nd bar. I can imagine the reason to print the sharp sign after a linebreak and/or pagebreak. But in such a case I would not repeat the sharp on the snd quarter. The proposed behavior by Elain Gould in Behind bars (p 80) is to have a single sharp, without braces, on the second line before the tied note. Yes, that's what I had in mind. How can I prevent LilyPond from printing a second sharp in the second bar? MT