Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 11:36, Peter Crighton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 23:40, Peter Crighton > wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:31, Jean Abou Samra wrote: >> >>> Silly me, the code was plain wrong. Here is a fixed version. >>> >> That works beautifully in my test file, thanks a lot!

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 23:40, Peter Crighton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:31, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > >> Silly me, the code was plain wrong. Here is a fixed version. >> > That works beautifully in my test file, thanks a lot! I’ll test it more > tomorrow in my actual project and let you kn

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:31, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 24/03/2021 à 22:06, Peter Crighton a écrit : > > Thank you. It fixes the error, so the score at least compiles again. But > it sadly also renders my use of \override > RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f useless. (Compare in my > or

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

(let* ((grob (car remaining-texts)) (my-priority (ly:grob-property grob 'outside-staff-priority))) (for-each (cute ly:pointer-group-interface::ad

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

? A change to the >> > multi-mark-engraver I could apply? A good alternative to >> > multi-mark-engraver? Another way to vertically level rehearsal marks >> > other than through disabling outside-staff-priority? >> >> If you want marks aligned on the same level

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

utside-staff-priority = ##f to > have all marks appear at the same vertical level (relative to the > chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with > outside-staff-priority, using the two together results in the error > Wrong type argumen

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

> > template use \override RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f to > > have all marks appear at the same vertical level (relative to the > > chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with > > outside-staff-priority, using the two together results i

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

level (relative to the chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with outside-staff-priority, using the two together results in the error Wrong type argument in position 1: #f. Any ideas on how to get this working together? A change to the multi-mark-engraver I could apply?

multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

multiple rehearsal marks at the same time. As I in my template use \override RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f to have all marks appear at the same vertical level (relative to the chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with outside-staff-priority, using the two together

Re: Problem with outside-staff-priority

Sorry for the redundant question. I forgot that I already obtained an answer for the same question (and I did not delete in my "how-to" list, meanwhile) http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Outside-staff-priority-and-vertical-order-of-grobs-td226058.html On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:3

Problem with outside-staff-priority

Hello, what's wrong in the following code? (tested on both 2.18 and 2,19) I would like that the Script grob appear below the other grobs, then I set the lowest value for its outside-staff-priority, but it appears above the TupletBracket. How can I fix this? Thanks, P % {

Outside-staff-priority ignored for OttavaBracket

{ \ottava #1 c'''8^>^\mf[(^\markup{ legato }\startTextSpan e'' f''' g''' e'''']} c''''4\stopTextSpan \ottava #0 c'') } %%% On 2.19.83 the SVG output produces a collision on the OttavaB

Re: Outside staff priority

Ralph Palmer writes: > Greetings - > > I feel kind of stupid. I don't understand why the following four examples > all produce the same output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* > TextScripts? Neither are. They are both of type Script , not TextScript . That doesn't change the principal problem

Re: Outside staff priority

Kieren MacMillan wrote: Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;) Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the musical moment, right? Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their priority order. The

Re: Outside staff priority

Hi Ralph, >> Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;) > Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the > musical moment, right? Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their priority order. > Perfect! Than

Re: Outside staff priority

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:22 AM Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same > output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts? > > Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;

Re: Outside staff priority

Hi Ralph, > I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same > output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts? Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;) > I'm trying to get the trill below the upbow. How about f'4( -\tweak script-

Outside staff priority

Greetings - I feel kind of stupid. I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts? I'm trying to get the trill below the upbow. I'm using LilyPond 2.19.83 with Frescobaldi 3.0.0 under Linux/Ubuntu 18.04

Re: Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

grob and preserve at >> > the same time the vertical order set with outside-staff-priority? >> >> Provoke collision by setting staff-padding of TupletBracket to the >> same value and let LilyPond sort it. >> > > Hello Thomas, > > This method, unfortuna

Re: Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:38 PM Thomas Morley wrote: > Am Mo., 9. Dez. 2019 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Paolo Pr : > > > > > Is there a way to set the staff-padding property of a grob and preserve > at the same time the vertical order set with outside-staff-priority? > > P

Re: Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

Am Mo., 9. Dez. 2019 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Paolo Pr : > > Hello, > > in the following snippet, I assigned to the TupletBracket grob an > outside-staff-priority higher than the OttavaBracket. Then, the OttavaBracket > is placed below it, as expected. > >

Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

Hello, in the following snippet, I assigned to the TupletBracket grob an outside-staff-priority higher than the OttavaBracket. Then, the OttavaBracket is placed below it, as expected. { \override TupletBracket.outside-staff-priority = #340 \override Staff.OttavaBracket.outside-staff

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

> > I'm trying to place a RehearsalMark under a MetronomeMark and from the > > Notation Manual derived I should set the outside-staff-priority property > > for that. > > Playing with it resulted in the six examples below. Only the 5. shows the > >

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

> > Could someone please shed some light as to why lilypond behaves the way it > > does? > > > > The default context for both Mark_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver > is Score. Your overrides are ineffective because you omit 'Score.' Aaahh. Thank you Robin for this explanation. Kind regar

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

Michael Gerdau wrote: Could someone please shed some light as to why lilypond behaves the way it does? The default context for both Mark_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver is Score. Your overrides are ineffective because you omit 'Score.' Cheers, Robin

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

Hi Michael, > I'm trying to place a RehearsalMark under a MetronomeMark and from the > Notation Manual derived I should set the outside-staff-priority property for > that. > Playing with it resulted in the six examples below. Only the 5. shows the > RehearsalMark w

Not understanding outside-staff-priority

Hi list, I'm trying to place a RehearsalMark under a MetronomeMark and from the Notation Manual derived I should set the outside-staff-priority property for that. Playing with it resulted in the six examples below. Only the 5. shows the RehearsalMark where I want it to be. Why don't

RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote > FoxFanFare, > > Why not place the slut above the notes? > To me that would be more conventional. > > Mark Actually, the exemple above was just for demonstration. The problem is in another context: pedal.JPG

Re: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: >> Mark Stephen Mrotek >> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2018 7:45 AM >> To: 'foxfanfare' ; lilypond-user@gnu.org >> Subject: RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority >> >> FoxFanFare, >> >>

RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

3:12 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority Hi all, Could someone please tell me what's wrong in my code? \version "2.19.81" \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff.SustainPedal.outside-staff-priority = #5 \shape #'((0 . 0

RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

Subject: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority Hi all, Could someone please tell me what's wrong in my code? \version "2.19.81" \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff.SustainPedal.outside-staff-priority = #5 \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . -5)(0 . -5)(0 . 0))Slur c_( d

SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

Hi all, Could someone please tell me what's wrong in my code? \version "2.19.81" \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff.SustainPedal.outside-staff-priority = #5 \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . -5)(0 . -5)(0 . 0))Slur c_( d e f g\sustainOn a b c d e f g)\sustainOff } pedal1.JPG

Re: outside-staff-priority?

On 23.11.2015 23:05, Ralph Palmer wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen MacNeil mailto:classicalja...@gmail.com>> wrote: \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #5 \tempo "Mod. fast Bulgar" 4 = 110-115 My thanks to both Stephen and to Malte Meyn. Yes, I missed "Score". I

Re: outside-staff-priority?

Ralph Palmer writes: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen MacNeil > wrote: > >> \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #5 >> >> \tempo "Mod. fast Bulgar" 4 = 110-115 >> > > My thanks to both Stephen and to Malte Meyn. Yes, I missed "Score". I was > using Staff. "outside.staff.priority" wo

Re: outside-staff-priority?

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen MacNeil wrote: > \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #5 > > \tempo "Mod. fast Bulgar" 4 = 110-115 > My thanks to both Stephen and to Malte Meyn. Yes, I missed "Score". I was using Staff. "outside.staff.priority" would imply something other than "Staff

Re: outside-staff-priority?

Am 23.11.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Ralph Palmer: I tried setting the outside-staff-priority of each and/or both, but without success. \override Score.MetronomeMark.outside-staff-priority = 1501 % or \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = 999 You probably missed the “Score

outside-staff-priority?

tried setting the outside-staff-priority of each and/or both, but without success. I'm also not sure if MetronomeMark is the correct designation for the \tempo indication. Thanks in advance for any assistance, Ralph %%% begin snippet \version "2.19.31" \includ

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

Apologies, there’s a spurious override later in the code that I had not remembered. My fault. Andrew > On 10 Oct 2015, at 22:07, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 10.10.2015 13:04, Andrew Bernard wrote: >> It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its >> o

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

On 10.10.2015 13:04, Andrew Bernard wrote: It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its outside-staff-priority It’s probably simple as that: Ottava_spanner_engraver lives in Staff, so you need to \override Staff.OttavaBracket. Yours, Simon

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

I thought you can do this sort of thing with an ordering: 2< 3. But I have to use 401 > 400, where 400 is the setting for the ottava bracket. I don’t have to do this for other sorts of objects. It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its outside-staff-priority, unless I a

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

Il giorno sab 10 ott 2015 alle 11:58, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: I want to put an ottava bracket inside a tuplet bracket. Using the outside-staff-priority parameter, this will only work if the tuplet bracket priority is greater than 400, which is the default for the ottava bracket. I thought

Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

I want to put an ottava bracket inside a tuplet bracket. Using the outside-staff-priority parameter, this will only work if the tuplet bracket priority is greater than 400, which is the default for the ottava bracket. I thought that it was a matter of numerical ordering to do this, not absolute

Re: outside-staff-priority for markups attached to <>

x27;t seem to be able to control the > >outside-staff-priority. In this example despite the second bit of > >markup having a lower outside-staff-priority it appears above the > >first bit. > > > >\version "2.18.0" > >\score { > > { \once \override TextS

Re: outside-staff-priority for markups attached to <>

At 17:26 on 26 Jun 2014, Richard Shann wrote: >When I generate text to appear above some music using the <>^\markup >"mytext" syntax, I don't seem to be able to control the >outside-staff-priority. In this example despite the second bit of >markup having a lower

outside-staff-priority for markups attached to <>

When I generate text to appear above some music using the <>^\markup "mytext" syntax, I don't seem to be able to control the outside-staff-priority. In this example despite the second bit of markup having a lower outside-staff-priority it appears above the first bit. \ve

Re: Why does TextScript outside-staff-priority not work in this case?

nd number. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Why-does-TextScript-outside-staff-priority-not-work-in-this-case--tp31079954p31080638.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-u

Why does TextScript outside-staff-priority not work in this case?

Hello, I am wanting to shift some \markups nearer to the staff and cannot understand why setting the outside-staff-priority of TextScript is not working in this case. --- \version "2.13.51" \relative c'' { R1*2 \override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = ##f

Re: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

\consists "Bar_number_engraver" \override TextSpanner #'outside-staff-priority = #350 \override BarNumber #'outside-staff-priority = #50 } } \relative c' { \textSpannerUp \override TextSpanner #'(bound-detai

Re: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

Frédéric Bron wrote: > > In the following example I cannot get the bar number below the text > spanner. I tried to change the outside-staff-priority but this does > not work. > Regards, > that's weird - but in 2.13.16 it works as expected! -- View this me

Re: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

Read the Learning Manual (section 4.4.3 explains how to do this) or search the archives. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Frédéric Bron" To: "lilypond-user" Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:51 AM Subject: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner wit

outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

In the following example I cannot get the bar number below the text spanner. I tried to change the outside-staff-priority but this does not work. Regards, Frédéric \version "2.12.2" \relative c' { \override TextSpanner #'outside-staff-priority = #350 \override

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

Jonathan Wilkes wrote Friday, September 18, 2009 7:12 PM --- On Fri, 9/18/09, Trevor Daniels wrote: The difficulty is that there is no general rule that can be used to discover which properties have an effect on a particular grob and which do not. In this case one has to know that hairpins a

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

--- On Fri, 9/18/09, Trevor Daniels wrote: > From: Trevor Daniels > Subject: Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin > To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , lilypond-user@gnu.org > Date: Friday, September 18, 2009, 10:22 AM > > Jonathan Wilkes wrote Friday

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

w why I can't just set Hairpin to #1 and the Slur to #2 for 'outside-staff-priority. And I forgot to search the LM before posting. Yes, I've read (but not memorized) the LM, and I see that overriding the 'outside-staff-priority for DynamicLineSpanner works > while using t

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

--- On Thu, 9/17/09, Trevor Daniels wrote: > From: Trevor Daniels > Subject: Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin > To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , lilypond-user@gnu.org > Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 10:08 AM > > Jonathan Wilkes wrote Thursday

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

Jonathan Wilkes wrote Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:38 AM I did a quick exercise typsetting a Schumann score, and I'm puzzled because to get the hairpin under the slur I had to turn up 'outside-staff-priority for the slur to be greater than 250. Otherwise, the snippet bel

outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

Hello, I did a quick exercise typsetting a Schumann score, and I'm puzzled because to get the hairpin under the slur I had to turn up 'outside-staff-priority for the slur to be greater than 250. Otherwise, the snippet below doesn't work correctly. Reading the NR,

Re: outside-staff-priority with \mark and Markup

Gilles There is quite an extensive section on 'outside-staff-priority in the 2.11 Learning Manual which explains why this doesn't work and what needs to be done to fix it. See LM 4.4.3. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Gilles THIBAULT" <[EMAIL PROTECT

outside-staff-priority with \mark and Markup

Hello everybody. In this example, outside-staff-priority seems to not work. What am i doing wrong ? \version "2.11.63" { \override RehearsalMark #'outside-staff-priority = #100 \override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = #200 b1 b \bar "||&qu

Re: outside-staff-priority

Risto Vääräniemi wrote: The manual doesn't mention lyrics, though. Sometimes I'd like to move a hairpin or similar above the lyrics. How do I do that? One solution is to use the Dynamics context defined in the template called "Piano centered dynamics". /Mats _

Re: outside-staff-priority

On 12/03/2008, David Bobroff wrote: > The following short example exhibits a problem I've not been able to > solve. The rehearsal marks are placed further from the staff than the > MultiMeasureRestText. I want to keep the rehearsal marks close to the > staff and have the text further away. We

Re: outside-staff-priority

Hi David, I would also like to know if it is still possible to widen the MultiMeasureRest. I know this used to be possible with minimumMeasureWidth or something. Haven't found a reference to anything like that in the current docs. \override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #15 wh

outside-staff-priority

ch other \override RehearsalMark #'outside-staff-priority = #1 \override MultiMeasureRestText #'outside-staff-priority = #5 \mark \default R1*2^\markup{"some text"} \mark \default R1 } } \paper { ragged-right = ##t } _