Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:36:05PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le jeudi 25 juin 2009 à 03:50 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > > Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize > > info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :) > > I guess the email medium is preferred, or at least

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:46:04AM -0500, David R. Linn wrote: > >> Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize > >> info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :) > > Or for the people who happily use email and do *not* use RSS, > we could continue to make announcements by the wor

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:11:29PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 03:50 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham > Percival: > > > ok, panic resolved: > > Oh, you are using a good bit of content literally from the old > site, right? Would there be a way to be easy on th

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:56:21PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: > All though I don't think 'contact' is a good header for the mailinglist > and stuff. Contact does me think about an person of companies address to > contact with. > > 'support' or 'community support' maybe? The absolutely-gua

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread John Mandereau
Le jeudi 25 juin 2009 à 03:50 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize > info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :) I guess the email medium is preferred, or at least more used, by some people than RSS, and this puts very little overhead on

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread David R. Linn
>> Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize >> info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :) >> ... I'm not arguing that we /shouldn't/ get rid of info. The >> current webpage supports RSS, so if we dump the news items into >> RSS, then people could get their instant notificati

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
Well, if translators used some translator tools like http://www.omegat.org/ they would automatically recognize already translated texts. Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 03:50 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: ok, panic resolved: Oh, you are using a

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 03:50 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: > ok, panic resolved: Oh, you are using a good bit of content literally from the old site, right? Would there be a way to be easy on the translators by keeping some kind of @comment tag where the original text came f

Re: new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Graham Percival wrote: ok, panic resolved: http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html Nice. All though I don't think 'contact' is a good header for the mailinglist and stuff. Contact does me think about an person of companies address to contact with. 'support' or 'c

new website: draft 2.5, resolved

2009-06-25 Thread Graham Percival
ok, panic resolved: http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:20:40AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Yes, 5 or six maximum, I think. What if you prioritize and see > what falls off? Mao. I forgot the most important rule of design: perfection i