el 2019-02-19 a las 22:05 Thomas Morley escribió:
> You could even do:
>
> #(define-public (my-flag grob)
> ((straight-flag 0.4 1 -70 3 -70 3) grob))
>
> {
> \override Flag.stencil = #my-flag
> a'8
> b'
> }
> %% or
> {
> \override Flag.stencil =
> #(lambda (grob) ((straight-flag 0
Am Di., 19. Feb. 2019 um 15:37 Uhr schrieb edes :
>
>
> el 2019-02-19 a las 11:30 Thomas Morley escribió:
>
> > Did you already try my suggestion for flat flags?
> >
> > #(define-public (flat-flag grob)
> > "Flat flag style. The angles of the flags are both 0 degrees"
> > ((straight-flag 0.48
el 2019-02-19 a las 11:30 Thomas Morley escribió:
> Did you already try my suggestion for flat flags?
>
> #(define-public (flat-flag grob)
> "Flat flag style. The angles of the flags are both 0 degrees"
> ((straight-flag 0.48 0.81 0 1.0 0 1.0) grob))
>
> Put it on top of your ly-file, you
Am Di., 19. Feb. 2019 um 01:42 Uhr schrieb edes :
>
>
> el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió:
>
> > Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags
> > should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for
> > modern/old-straight-flags.
>
> I forgot to mention that in
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió:
> Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags
> should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for
> modern/old-straight-flags.
I forgot to mention that in the only example that I have at hand of
horizontal flags (Xenakis
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió:
> Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags
> should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for
> modern/old-straight-flags.
And now I tend to agree with you... :-)
Both examples I mentioned in my other email (Boulez
On 2/17/19, 7:52 PM, "edes" wrote:
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió:
> I'm currently working on it.
Thank you!
> Though, there is a design-decision we need to do.
Indeed...
In general terms, I stand by my original opini
