Am Di., 19. Feb. 2019 um 15:37 Uhr schrieb edes <e...@gmx.net>:
>
>
> el 2019-02-19 a las 11:30 Thomas Morley escribió:
>
> > Did you already try my suggestion for flat flags?
> >
> > #(define-public (flat-flag grob)
> > "Flat flag style. The angles of the flags are both 0 degrees"
> > ((straight-flag 0.48 0.81 0 1.0 0 1.0) grob))
> >
> > Put it on top of your ly-file, you should see a significant improvement.
>
>
> That's great, thank you! I didn't even know you could modify those
> properties in the lilypond code, I thought you had to edit the sources and
> recompile lilypond.
You could even do:
#(define-public (my-flag grob)
((straight-flag 0.4 1 -70 3 -70 3) grob))
{
\override Flag.stencil = #my-flag
a'8
b'
}
%% or
{
\override Flag.stencil =
#(lambda (grob) ((straight-flag 0.4 1 -70 3 0 3) grob))
a'8
b'
}
>
> Your suggested values are a significant improvement, indeed, although I
> do not use flat flags.
>
> I tried these values for straight-modern, and I find the result
> satisfactory:
>
> #(define-public (modern-straight-flag grob)
> ((straight-flag 0.52 0.88 -18 1.1 22 1.2) grob))
>
>
> One problem remains, though: the first flag is not aligned with the end of
> the stem (see the attached ly files and their output).
Yep, for this 'straight-flag' from flag-styles needs to be changed.
It will be part of my patch, I hope.
Cheers,
Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
