... ...
On 13 Sep 2012, at 09:58 , David Kastrup wrote:
For Mac OS X: Work is being done to create a more complete
installer.
You probably already saw that; I just include it to get other
commentors
up to date.
Yep, I decided not to spend very much time to get it working, but wait
fo
Wim van Dommelen writes:
> Commends on the user-interface:
>
> Some time ago I tried to get Frescobaldi running, but didn't
> succeed. Too much dependencies and version conflicts and requests for
> some versions which are explicitly requested but don't exist
> anymore. However, it works on my Ubu
Commends on the user-interface:
Some time ago I tried to get Frescobaldi running, but didn't succeed.
Too much dependencies and version conflicts and requests for some
versions which are explicitly requested but don't exist anymore.
However, it works on my Ubuntu-machine from the box and I
ept. 2012, at 10:25, Phil Holmes <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> - Original Message - From: "macula" <[hidden email]>
> >> To: <[hidden email]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:55 AM
> >> Subject: Re: mac lion
>
e ----- From: "macula"
>> To:
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:55 AM
>> Subject: Re: mac lion
>>
>>
>>> I can confirm that 2.16.0, at least, works with 10.7.4.
>>>
>>> As far as building the binaries, however, my experie
source. I would recommend using Frescobaldi.
Jean-Alexis
On 11 sept. 2012, at 10:25, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "macula"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:55 AM
> Subject: Re: mac lion
>
>
>> I can confirm that 2.16
- Original Message -
From: "macula"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: mac lion
I can confirm that 2.16.0, at least, works with 10.7.4.
As far as building the binaries, however, my experience has been negative.
I
have been unable to compile Lily
/html/lilypond-devel/2012-09/msg00452.html),
and hopefully one of the wizards will take a few moments to examine it as it
is reproducible and not limited to my machine.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/mac-lion-tp132498p132748.html
Sent from the User mailing
As far as I tested, LilyPond (last versions) works fine with JEdit and
LilyPondTool.
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/mac-lion-tp132498p132746.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
flup2 writes:
> Hello,
>
> No problem with 2.16 or 2.17 on a Mac with Lion or Mountain Lion, either
> with its own interface, or through command line, JEdit, Frescobaldi etc.
> (knowing that JEdit simply calls the command line of LilyPond).
>
> The previous problem of LilyPond on Mac only concern
; there was no problem with command line, JEdit or Frescobaldi.
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/mac-lion-tp132498p132686.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user
fabio gabbianelli writes:
> anyone knows if lilypond 2.16 or 2.17 works with osx 10.7? it could work
> through "jEdit" ?
I don't see any news about a version of LilyPondTool for 2.16 or
later. But maybe I just wasn't paying attention. (LilyPondTool is the
best way to use jEdit with Lilypond).
Hi Fabio,
Works perfect for me regardless of Lilypond-version up to 2.17.1
Best regards,
Kai
... von unterwegs gesendet!
Am 07.09.2012 um 12:55 schrieb fabio gabbianelli :
> anyone knows if lilypond 2.16 or 2.17 works with osx 10.7? it could work
> through "jEdit" ?
> ___
anyone knows if lilypond 2.16 or 2.17 works with osx 10.7? it could work
through "jEdit" ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
14 matches
Mail list logo
