Re: how to include a path in lyp

2020-10-23 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Stefan, I had a little to do with the initial development of lyp, but it has fallen by the wayside due to very low uptake. While it's a good idea, it has not fulfilled its promise and blossomed, due to no-one's fault. I contacted Sharon the owner of the project today and he confirme

how to include a path in lyp

2020-09-28 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, I've recently and successfully installed lyp, which seems to be a great thing. When I use the lilypond command, I normally use a bash alias, that allows my to automatically include a folder, in which I have some templates. I would like to integrate this path in lyp, but I&

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Sami Amiris
I wrote it in Git. The code probably is in Ruby, but I don't know enough Ruby to fix it at this point anyway. I reported the problem and it is up to the developers now. Thanks again! S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Urs Liska
re > is a workaround. > > > But better would be to get the LilyPond invocation right. > > The wrapper script created by the LilyPond installer (download > > version) > i>ncludes (depending on the install location) > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home//lilypond/

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Sami Amiris
d installer (download version) i>ncludes (depending on the install location) > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home//lilypond/usr/lib" > >And it should be possible to get lyp to use something in the LilyPond i>nvocation too. Naive question, but just asking anyway: Is this some

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Urs Liska
try on. Tedious, but it might get you > up and running. > But better would be to get the LilyPond invocation right. The wrapper script created by the LilyPond installer (download version) includes (depending on the install location) export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home//lilypond/usr/lib"

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread David Wright
On Tue 17 Mar 2020 at 13:56:20 (-0700), Sami Amiris wrote: > Well, that was a true surprise there. Yes, the ps file is fine. Its > conversion to pdf seems to be the problem. Plus, it is all with the bravura > font as I had written. That's good news for LilyPond itself. > Thank you for the tip. Ne

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Sami Amiris
Well, that was a true surprise there. Yes, the ps file is fine. Its conversion to pdf seems to be the problem. Plus, it is all with the bravura font as I had written. Thank you for the tip. Never expected it tbh... Still, what do we do now? Apart from reporting it to the Git hub that is? Thank y

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread David Wright
> > Here you should tell exactly which stage of the whole printing process > > you reached. "Printing" is sometimes used in the manuals for > > "rendering" but there are intermediate PS files which could be correct > > even if latest Ghostscript command fa

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Sami Amiris
Thank you very much, will do. Yes, it looks very much like that. Thanks again. -S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Urs Liska
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 07:10 -0700 schrieb Sami Amiris: > Hello, and thank you both for your replies. > > Yes, it is the lyp program as described above by Mr. Urs Liska. I > have a > Fedora 31 system and a Windows system as well, but right now I am > using the > Fedo

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Sami Amiris
Hello, and thank you both for your replies. Yes, it is the lyp program as described above by Mr. Urs Liska. I have a Fedora 31 system and a Windows system as well, but right now I am using the Fedora one. I use vim and call lilypond from the command line - the program gives me the output logs in

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Urs Liska
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 13:02 +0100 schrieb Francisco Vila: > Hello Sami, > > El 16/3/20 a las 18:39, Sami Amiris escribió: > > At first I had a system version, 2.19.84, which ran fine. I > > installed lyp, > > and wanting to take advantage of all the great stuff

Re: lyp

2020-03-17 Thread Francisco Vila
Hello Sami, El 16/3/20 a las 18:39, Sami Amiris escribió: At first I had a system version, 2.19.84, which ran fine. I installed lyp, and wanting to take advantage of all the great stuff it allows us to have, I uninstalled my system lilypond and re-installed it in lyp, along the all-new stable

lyp

2020-03-16 Thread Sami Amiris
Hello esteemed members. I am not a power-user by any stretch of the imagination, so my questions might be a bit silly or worse. Still, I will be asking them if I don't find them answered somewhere, hoping to not impose too much. I recently read about a problem with Ghostscript relating t

Re: lyp version 0.3.3 + new font packages

2016-02-25 Thread Sharon Rosner
And of course the link to lyp: http://noteflakes.github.io/lyp/ <http://noteflakes.github.io/lyp/> -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/lyp-version-0-3-3-new-font-packages-tp187735p187736.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabb

lyp version 0.3.3 + new font packages

2016-02-25 Thread Sharon Rosner
Hi everybody, Here's a small update on lyp - the lilypond package manager. Lyp is a package manager for Lilypond. It lets users install and switch between different versions of Lilypond, and install and manage lilypond packages in order to facilitate code reuse and sharing. Some of the ch

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
On 28-01-2016 19:52, Sharon Rosner wrote: Hello all, I'd like to announce lyp - a package manager for Lilypond: https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp <https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp> Great work, Sharon! I'm very excited! _

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Johan Vromans
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:49:36 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: > But: it was him who actually started to work on this. And without this > we wouldn't even have anything to nitpick about. Exactly. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Urs Liska
Am 29.01.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Sharon Rosner: > Considering the alternatives I think this solution we came up with is > clearly the winner. If you can think of a better one please let me know. One more comment which may help avoid any unnecessary boiling up of discussion: I'm not sure if I 100% a

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Sharon Rosner
of development to anyone who > just wants a copy of the current version, and those people will > disproportionately be the ones least able to make use of the history. Please note that installing packages using lyp does not require you to manually clone git repositories. In fact, to install pa

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Sharon Rosner
> With regard to everything else I think nothing speaks against > *extending* lyp to support arbitrary directories as well. lyp already supports installing packages from local files. lyp install mypack:~/mypack-repo This feature can be used also for package development. > The Git &

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Urs Liska
t the idea behind Sharon's approach is that such Git based packages *do* contain a history that's useful for everybody, namely all *versions* of the package. lyp will fetch the repository and can then checkout arbitrary versions (that it may need for the dependency resolution Sharon is writing

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread mskala
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Sharon Rosner wrote: > >...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I > > tried to give it a fair chance. > > Please explain why packages as hosted git repositories is a bad idea. What > would be a better solution in your opinion? Version control syst

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Sharon Rosner
> Do you have a contributor's guide yet? The documentation could be improved a lot, but the README includes a section about developing packages: https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp#developing-packages Sharon Rosner -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.c

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-29 Thread Sharon Rosner
olution in your opinion? > I read the readme as far as the line about piping the output of curl into > bash. I stopped there. If you actually *had* read up to that point in the readme, you will have noticed that: 1. Nobody's forcing you to install lyp that way. You can also install it

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-28 Thread Johan Vromans
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:08:53 -0600 (CST) msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > ...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I > tried to give it a fair chance. I read the readme as far as the line > about piping the output of curl into bash. I stopped there. Just replace

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-28 Thread mskala
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Urs Liska wrote: > I think one of the nice things in Sharon's approach is that you don't > *have* to contribute - you can also simply make your packages available. ...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I tried to give it a fair chance. I read t

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-28 Thread Urs Liska
ron's approach is that you don't *have* to contribute - you can also simply make your packages available. Urs >Cheers,MS > > >Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message >From: Sharon Rosner Date: 28/01/2016 11:52 >PM (GMT+02:00) To: lily

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-28 Thread Mike Solomon
Date: 28/01/2016 11:52 PM (GMT+02:00) To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond Hello all, I'd like to announce lyp - a package manager for Lilypond:    https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp <https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp>  I started writing lyp a coup

lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

2016-01-28 Thread Sharon Rosner
Hello all, I'd like to announce lyp - a package manager for Lilypond: https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp <https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp> I started writing lyp a couple of months ago, as a result of discussions Urs Liska, Matteo Ceccarello and me were having a on how