Till:
...
> @Karl:
> I think, these editorial tricks are not only specific to ancient music --
No, they are not. They are just more common in editions from earlier
sources.
> and there is also enough material in the staff section that should allow you
> to create an additional staff (ossia) above
I indeed was referring to that one -- looks like a nice solution, I guess a
number of 2 would also be sufficient to get open note heads?
@Karl:
I think, these editorial tricks are not only specific to ancient music --
and there is also enough material in the staff section that should allow you
to
Kurt:
> On 2008/04/09 3:45 PM, "Karl Hammar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Trevor Daniels schrieb:
> > ...
> >>> .3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
> >> Karl:
> >>
> >> We don't have lilypond examples of this. I have seen this in a Novello
> >> score for Purcells Dido. So I suggest we dro
i think you need:
\override NoteHead #'duration-log = #1
d
On 10 Apr 2008, at 05:47, Kurt Kroon wrote:
On 2008/04/09 3:45 PM, "Karl Hammar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
...
.3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
Karl:
We don't have lilypond examples of this. I have
On 2008/04/09 3:45 PM, "Karl Hammar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trevor Daniels schrieb:
> ...
>>> .3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
>> Karl:
>>
>> We don't have lilypond examples of this. I have seen this in a Novello
>> score for Purcells Dido. So I suggest we drop this for the moment.
>
Till:
> Trevor Daniels schrieb:
...
> > .3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
> Karl:
>
> We don't have lilypond examples of this. I have seen this in a Novello
> score for Purcells Dido. So I suggest we drop this for the moment.
> (Though an ossia section might show what the editor want.)
>
>
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:47:58 +0300
Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually Graham has pronounced that we should not have a
> task-orientated structure, but just tell about the issues not
> referring to the context they are used to. But maybe it is still ok
> in this case.
Ancient music
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
OK, draft 8 will say:
.6 Editorial markings
.1 Annotational accidentals (was Musica ficta accidentals)
(2.8.4)
.2 Ligature brackets (was Ligatures)
(2.8.2.4)
.3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
Karl:
We don't have lilypond examples of this
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
OK, draft 8 will say:
.6 Editorial markings
.1 Annotational accidentals (was Musica ficta accidentals)
(2.8.4)
.2 Ligature brackets (was Ligatures)
(2.8.2.4)
.3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
(new - KH)
Ok, so as I understand in 8.
Trevor:
...
> OK, draft 8 will say:
>
>.6 Editorial markings
> .1 Annotational accidentals (was Musica ficta accidentals)
> (2.8.4)
> .2 Ligature brackets (was Ligatures)
> (2.8.2.4)
I don't regard ligature brackets as an editorial thing, since it
is just the modern
Till Rettig wrote
I don't know, what these slurs mean, I came up with the following
editiorial items:
1. annotational accidentals
2. ligature brackets [I think they should be here, and not together
with the ligatures]
3. Barock rhythm indication
1 is the same as 6.1, maybe 2 is the same as 6.
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bartok.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15125 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/lilypond-user/attachments/20080408/fdf05186/bartok.png
------------------
12 matches
Mail list logo
