After manually running updatedb and locate, then deleting any instance
of frescobaldi and python-ly in /usr/* in order to remove prior version
conflicts, I ran
sudo python setup.py install from the unzipped source directory, which
finished as below (emphasis added):
On 6 Jun 2009, at 05:45, kje...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I attempted to follow instruction set C for LilyPond & Terminal
install on Mac
OS X Leopard. I've run into problems.
"Download the latest stable release (2.12.2-1) of LilyPond and put
LilyPond.app
in your Applications folder."
I jus
If you're absolutely brand new to lilypond, using the terminal may
not be the best solution. Unless you are very familiar with terminal
applications, in which case, I would suggest the instructions in the
documentation at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/
lilypond-program/Set
comments at bottom...
kje...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I attempted to follow instruction set C for LilyPond & Terminal install
on Mac
OS X Leopard. I've run into problems.
"Download the latest stable release (2.12.2-1) of LilyPond and put
LilyPond.app
in your Applications folder."
Check.
"Do
I use 10.4 and LilyPond runs well there, but there is a lot of
commentary on the Web that LilyPond is severely broken on 10.5. I
don't have a 10.5 machine to test (and frankly won't upgrade to 10.5
until LilyPond is known to be stable and functional without a lot of
drama). Here's what ma
I attempted to follow instruction set C for LilyPond & Terminal install on Mac
OS X Leopard. I've run into problems.
"Download the latest stable release (2.12.2-1) of LilyPond and put LilyPond.app
in your Applications folder."
Check.
"Download this shell script and start it using Terminal."
I
Thanks for the report.
dependency? Is this a Lilypond problem or a Cygwin problem?
Packaging problem. My fault. I hope it'll be solved soon. You did well
installing the crypt package.
Problem 2) Regardless of what files I try to use with Lilypond I get
an error that the file could not be f
Greetings,
I have just re-installed (wipe the drive and installed from the ground
up) my computer and went to put Lily back on it. The other day when I
first installed it I used the Windows binary as opposed to using Cygwin.
Today I went with Cygwin. After installing Cygwin (v 2.457.2.2) I had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > IIRC, fontforge can be buikt without X so that it essentially works
> ^
> Ha, this almost looks like Dutch :-)
Yes, every time I use fontforge, I want to "belly" it. :-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www
> IIRC, fontforge can be buikt without X so that it essentially works
^
Ha, this almost looks like Dutch :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-u
> Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
IIRC, fontforge can be buikt without X so that it essentially works in
script mode only.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Hi,
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi,
Am 01.02.2005 um 22:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X1
Hi,
Am 01.02.2005 um 22:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from t
Am 01.02.2005 um 22:43 schrieb Chuck Boody:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Equally mysterious is the fact that my system is NOT using the tsch
shell even though OS 10.3.x is supposed to be using it.
As of 10.3 MacOSX uses bash as default shell. (10.0 - 10.2.x used
tcsh)
My ter
Thanks again,
See comments
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source
commu
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Equally mysterious is the fact that my system is NOT using the tsch
shell even though OS 10.3.x is supposed to be using it.
As of 10.3 MacOSX uses bash as default shell. (10.0 - 10.2.x used tcsh)
My terminal preferences are set to default. My ter
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source
community."
Did you install the "X11 for Mac OS X SDK" package too? It's an
optio
Thanks Christian,
See below:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source
community."
Did you install the "X11
Hi Chuck,
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11: "XFree86
4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source community."
Did you install the "X11 for Mac OS X SDK" package too? It's an option
when installing the Developer Too
Thanks Christ,
But still no success...
Two interesting things:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11: "XFree86
4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source community."
2) My error message still says: "Failed: Can't resolve dependency
"gcc3.1" for package "xfree8
Thanks for this info.
I've installed X11 and continue to get the same error message. I've no
idea what is going on...
Chuck Boody
On Feb 1, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
Hmm indeed. But we do not use the
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> > Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
>
> Hmm indeed. But we do not use the GUI. I wonder why fontforge needs
> to load the X libraries in batch mode.
>
> Jan.
(This is x86 and debian)
$ apt-get source fontforge
$ cd fontforge-0.0.200
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
Hmm indeed. But we do not use the GUI. I wonder why fontforge needs
to load the X libraries in batch mode.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Christ van Willegen writes:
>
> > What's weird is that a dependence of Lilypond appears to be xfree86!
> > Lilypond
> > 2.4 is a command line program, so it doesn't use X...
>
> That is not so weird, even Debian does have that.
>
> > Perhaps another tool requires X t
Christ van Willegen writes:
> What's weird is that a dependence of Lilypond appears to be xfree86! Lilypond
> 2.4 is a command line program, so it doesn't use X...
That is not so weird, even Debian does have that.
> Perhaps another tool requires X to work.
ghostscript and metafont are the obvio
Hi Chuck, list,
> Exactly the same problem happens. I've never installed the complete
> developer tools on the Mac. Could this be the problem??
As far as I can tell, the XCode Tools together with the gcc update ought to
be enough...
What's weird is that a dependence of Lilypond appears to be x
Thanks but...
Exactly the same problem happens. I've never installed the complete
developer tools on the Mac. Could this be the problem??
Chuck Boody
On Jan 30, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Christ van Willegen wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3
updater. Ran
Hi Chuck,
> Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3
> updater. Ran selfupdate-cvs. No porblems to here. Ran "fink install
> lilypond-unstable" Responded defaults to the questions. I get this
> error:
What happens if you do this:
fink selfupdate
fink install lilypon
My apologies if this is a second posting. I was not properly
subscribed to the list when I sent the first one.
Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3
updater. Ran selfupdate-cvs. No porblems to here. Ran "fink install
lilypond-unstable" Responded defaults to the
Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3
updater. Ran "fink install lilypond-unstable" Responded defaults to
the questions. I get this error:
Failed: Can't resolve dependency "gcc3.1" for package
"xfree86-4.4.0-14" (no matching packages/versions found)
If I use the
On 1/27/04 12:18 PM, "Stan Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, at 01:49 PM, David Rogers wrote:
>
>> I do know that updating via rsync is preferred over updating via cvs -
>> but that also forces you to use the whole "unstable" tree, which may be
>>
>
> As men
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, at 01:49 PM, David Rogers wrote:
I do know that updating via rsync is preferred over updating via cvs -
but that also forces you to use the whole "unstable" tree, which may be
As mentioned previously, I believe (unless Walter is running OS 10.3)
that the db42-shlibs
On 2004/01/27, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>I successfully executed the "fink reinstall fink" command from the
>terminal but when I tried the "selfupdate" command, I got the
following:
>
>/usr/bin/su walterhofmeister -c 'cvs -z3 update -d -P'
>*** malloc: vm_allocate(size=1342177280) failed with 3
>
>
> Try the following:
>
>
> open a new Terminal window and type:
> fink reinstall fink
>
> (and press Return, of course)
> When that finishes, open FinkCommander, go to the Source menu and choose
> Selfupdate. After that, choose Update-all from the same menu.
>
> Hopefully then the correct pa
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 04:02 PM, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink (.17.10and
got the
warning:
WARNING: While resolving dependency "db42-shlibs" for package
"lilypond-unstable-2.1.10-1", package "db42-shlibs" was not found.
Failed: Can't r
On 2004/01/26, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>On 1/26/04 3:12 PM, "David Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2004/01/26, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>>
>>> I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink...
>>
>> Are you using FinkCommander, or working in the Terminal?
>>
>> (Either way
On 1/26/04 3:12 PM, "David Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004/01/26, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>
>> I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink...
>
> Are you using FinkCommander, or working in the Terminal?
>
> (Either way is good, just finding out how to help you.)
>
>
I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink (.17.10and got the
warning:
WARNING: While resolving dependency "db42-shlibs" for package
"lilypond-unstable-2.1.10-1", package "db42-shlibs" was not found.
Failed: Can't resolve dependency "db42-shlibs" for package
"lilypond-unstable-2.1.10-
Installation of Lilypond on Cygwin:
Download setup.exe. (http://cygwin.com/setup.exe)
Run it.
Click Next
Select Install from Internet. Click next.
Use the Default setting for Root directory (c:\cygwin), Install for (All
users), Default Text File Type (Unix). Click Next.
Local Package Directory - L
I have downloaded the 'setup.exe'
for windows XP option from lilypond.org.
I have installed Cygwin - which is
running
I have run, successfully the
test.ly
I have tried to install GNU
Lilypond and receive the following error message
gunzip: lilypond-x.y.z: 'no
such file or directory
This is my problem, too. Seems to be spoecific to 1.6.6?
CB
Rune Zedeler wrote:
I solved the guile problems, and managed to build and install lily 1.6
at the uni.
Lilypond also compiles files with no problems (apart from problem with
determining size of tex-fonts. Perhaps more on that later).
I solved the guile problems, and managed to build and install lily 1.6
at the uni.
Lilypond also compiles files with no problems (apart from problem with
determining size of tex-fonts. Perhaps more on that later).
Problem is that dvips and xdvi cannot find the
music-drawing-routines.ps even thoug
42 matches
Mail list logo
