Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread Karl Hammar
David Kastrup: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > From: "Karl Hammar" > > > >> Yes, you can place the dynamics above the staff, but I don't really > >> see the point of that. Now your forte collides with the tempo > >> mark. And in choir notes it would only solve any potential collisions > >> between dy

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread Karl Hammar
David Kastrup: > k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) writes: ... > > This looks like a bug. > > > > \version "2.17.10" > > > > Ms = \relative a' { c4 c c c | } > > Ds = \relative a' { s\p s s\f s | } > > Ma = \relative a' { c4\p c c\f c } > > > > \score { > > << > > \new Staff \relative a' { c4\p

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread Karl Hammar
Phil Holmes: > > Yes, you can place the dynamics above the staff, but I don't really see > > the > > point of that. Now your forte collides with the tempo mark. And in choir > > notes > > it would only solve any potential collisions between dynamics and lyrics > > for > > one staff only. > > Th

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > From: "Karl Hammar" > >> Yes, you can place the dynamics above the staff, but I don't really >> see the point of that. Now your forte collides with the tempo >> mark. And in choir notes it would only solve any potential collisions >> between dynamics and lyrics for one st

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Karl Hammar" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 11:35 AM Subject: Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry Yes, you can place the dynamics above the staff, but I don't really see the point of that. Now your forte collides with the tem

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) writes: > Karl Hammar: >> Xavier Scheuer: >> > On 31 December 2012 15:22, Karl Hammar wrote: >> > > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the >> > > dynamics together with the notes? > ... >> > << \Ms \Ds >> % without the "\\" >> > will be

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread Karl Hammar
James Bailey: > On Dec 31, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Karl Hammar wrote: > > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the > > dynamics together with the notes? ... [ ly code for Ms and Ds ] ... > > If I use << \Ms \\ \Ds >> the dynamics will come out to the left > > (compared to the i

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2013-01-01 Thread Karl Hammar
Karl Hammar: > Xavier Scheuer: > > On 31 December 2012 15:22, Karl Hammar wrote: > > > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the > > > dynamics together with the notes? ... > > << \Ms \Ds >> % without the "\\" > > will behave as if you wrote the dynamics together with th

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread James Bailey
On Dec 31, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Karl Hammar wrote: > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the > dynamics together with the notes? > > smorz = \markup { \italic smorz } > sotto = \markup { \italic { sotto voce } } > Ds = { > s1*10 | s1^\sotto | s4 s2.\f | s4 s2.^\smorz |

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Karl, > Lilypond default seems to have it below. That's because dynamics for [almost?] all non-vocal instruments are engraved below the staff. I have defined a VocalStaff context, with all the appropriate #'direction = #UP overrides — this makes it very easy to add a vocal line without havin

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
Phil Holmes: > > I think I like the \new Dynamics version best if I could get the same > > space above and under the dynamics as for the within notes case. > As a general rule (and this would appear to include the music you're > setting) dynamics for singers are put above the staff, to avoid probl

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Karl Hammar" To: Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 5:01 PM Subject: Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry I think I like the \new Dynamics version best if I could get the same space above and under the dynamics as for the within notes cas

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
Xavier Scheuer: > On 31 December 2012 15:22, Karl Hammar wrote: > > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the > > dynamics together with the notes? > > > > (snip) > > > > If I use << \Ms \\ \Ds >> the dynamics will come out to the left > > (compared to the in the notes ve

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
Phil Holmes: ... > > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the > > dynamics together with the notes? > > > > smorz = \markup { \italic smorz } > > sotto = \markup { \italic { sotto voce } } > > Ds = { > > s1*10 | s1^\sotto | s4 s2.\f | s4 s2.^\smorz | s1\p | s1\pp | s1*2 |

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 31 December 2012 15:22, Karl Hammar wrote: > How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the > dynamics together with the notes? > > (snip) > > If I use << \Ms \\ \Ds >> the dynamics will come out to the left > (compared to the in the notes version), probably since the dynam

Re: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Karl Hammar" To: Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:22 PM Subject: dynamics seperatate from the notes entry How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? smorz = \markup { \italic smo

dynamics seperatate from the notes entry

2012-12-31 Thread Karl Hammar
How do I merge Ds and Ms below so it will behave as if I wrote the dynamics together with the notes? smorz = \markup { \italic smorz } sotto = \markup { \italic { sotto voce } } Ds = { s1*10 | s1^\sotto | s4 s2.\f | s4 s2.^\smorz | s1\p | s1\pp | s1*2 | s2 s\ | s4 s8. s16\f\> s4 s8.\! s16