> Another question: there's a way to disable the creation of backup
> files ending with ~?
Nope.
Werner
Il giorno dom 27 lug 2025 alle 10:06:00 +00:00:00, Werner LEMBERG
ha scritto:
Am I missing something?
Yes, you do :-)
-d, --diff-version-update
only update \version number if file is
modified
Ooops, of course. I'm tired.
Another question: there's a way to disable
> '''
> -c, --current-version
>
>By default, convert-ly updates the \version string to the lowest
>necessary version. If this option is given, the current LilyPond
>version (2.25.27) is used instead.
> '''
>
> So, IIUC, by
Hi all
I'm using the latest lilypond dev version (2.25.27).
In the Usage manual I read:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-options-for-convert_002dly
'''
-c, --current-version
By default, convert-ly updates the \version string to t
I run Frescobaldi on an .ly file, it seems to work correctly.
> >
> > When I open Terminal and type in
> > find . -name '*.ly' -exec convert-ly -e '{}' \;
> > and hit return, I get multiple lines of
> > /home/(me)/bin/convert-ly: 6: exec: /hom
nal and type in
> find . -name '*.ly' -exec convert-ly -e '{}' \;
> and hit return, I get multiple lines of
> /home/(me)/bin/convert-ly: 6: exec: /home/(me)/lilypond/usr/bin/python3: not
> found
Allow me to turn the question the other way around. How could that
Hi, All -
Many thanks for all your work and for your help.
I'm running Linux/Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS.
I'm having trouble with running convert-ly. I've successfully downloaded
and installed and run LilyPond 2.24.2 under Frescobaldi 3.2. (I decided to
stay with 3.2 because it seem
On 2023-03-09 20:05, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
* Replace `--show-rules` with a more common `--verbose` option to
show rule descriptions while `convert-ly` is running. Right
now, `--show-rules` only emits the rules but doesn't do a
conversion at the same time, which is rather useless
> > * Replace `--show-rules` with a more common `--verbose` option to
> > show rule descriptions while `convert-ly` is running. Right
> > now, `--show-rules` only emits the rules but doesn't do a
> > conversion at the same time, which is rather useless IMH
On 2023-03-04 19:15, Werner LEMBERG
wrote:
who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
being curious what this option does?
In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1854 we are
> > who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
> > being curious what this option does?
> >
> > In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1854 we are
> > discussing whether it would make sense to remove it.
>
> I
:
> (Sorry, my email client keeps using the wrong From: address)
>
>/Mats
> On 2023-03-04 08:09, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
> who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
> being curious what this option does?
>
> In
(Sorry, my email client keeps using the wrong From: address)
/Mats
On 2023-03-04 08:09, Werner LEMBERG
wrote:
Folks,
who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
being curious what this option does?
In https://gitlab.com
On 2023-03-04 08:09, Werner LEMBERG
wrote:
Folks,
who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
being curious what this option does?
In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1854 we are
discussing whether it would
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:10 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
> who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
> being curious what this option does?
>
> In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1854 we are
> discussing whe
Folks,
who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
being curious what this option does?
In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1854 we are
discussing whether it would make sense to remove it.
Please comment.
Werner
Now how did I miss that? Face-palm :-)
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:40 PM Mark Knoop wrote:
>
>
> At 17:41 on 01 Mar 2023, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> > Hi;
>
> > I think that convert-ly should write the current version to the
> > converted file(s).
>
At 17:41 on 01 Mar 2023, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hi;
> I think that convert-ly should write the current version to the
> converted file(s).
> If that statement is correct, then Lilypond version 2.24.1 writes the
> older version (2.24.0) to the converted file(s).
Please see th
écrit :
>
> Hi;
>
> I think that convert-ly should write the current version to the
> converted file(s).
>
> If that statement is correct, then Lilypond version 2.24.1 writes the
> older version (2.24.0) to the converted file(s).
>
> I believe it's intentional.
Le mercredi 01 mars 2023 à 17:41 -0800, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
> Hi;
>
> I think that convert-ly should write the current version to the
> converted file(s).
>
> If that statement is correct, then Lilypond version 2.24.1 writes the
> older version (2.24.0) to the
Hi;
I think that convert-ly should write the current version to the
converted file(s).
If that statement is correct, then Lilypond version 2.24.1 writes the
older version (2.24.0) to the converted file(s).
Here's my test script invocation:
./test_conversion_version.bash
> specify the full path to the convert.ly file, like this:
> find . -name '*.ly' -exec
> /home/michael/lilypond/lilypond-2.24.0/bin/convert-ly -e '{}' \;
> Maybe give that a shot and see what happens.
>
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:53 PM Ralph
Le 20/12/2022 à 03:52, Ralph Palmer a écrit :
Greetings -
Jean Abou Samra kindly pointed me in the right direction for the
installation of 2.24.0 in Linux with Frescobaldi.
I was successful. Then I tried running convert-ly for all my .ly
files, using
find . -name '*.ly' -exec
ng the
> KUbuntu distro, but should be close enough). I tried your command and had
> it fail. But, when I altered it just a bit it worked. All I had to do was
> specify the full path to the convert.ly file, like this:
> find . -name '*.ly' -exec
> /home/michael/lilypond/l
name '*.ly' -exec
/home/michael/lilypond/lilypond-2.24.0/bin/convert-ly -e '{}' \;
Maybe give that a shot and see what happens.
Michael
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:53 PM Ralph Palmer
wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> Jean Abou Samra kindly pointed me in the right direction for the
Greetings -
Jean Abou Samra kindly pointed me in the right direction for the
installation of 2.24.0 in Linux with Frescobaldi.
I was successful. Then I tried running convert-ly for all my .ly files,
using
find . -name '*.ly' -exec convert-ly -e '{}' \;
on the co
I’ve opened the issue #1492. This is my first time to open an issue on GitHub.
I’m not so sure I’ve done it correctly.
Best regards,
Jun
> 2022/12/17 22:31、Jean Abou Samra のメール:
>
>
>
>> Le 17 déc. 2022 à 14:28, TamuraJun a écrit :
>>
>> I think it would be nice to document this somewhere s
> Le 17 déc. 2022 à 14:28, TamuraJun a écrit :
>
> I think it would be nice to document this somewhere since Frescobaldi is now
> mentioned (and perhaps strongly recommended) in the Learning Manual.
I actually think it should be fixed in Frescobaldi. Can you open an issue on
its bug tracker
Thank you! That worked!
I did not realize that
> “Force use of the tools’ #1 lines” option needs to be checked on
I found that /opt/local/bin/convert-ly (part of 2.22.2) is a python script that
starts with:
#!/opt/local/bin/python3.10
while ~/lilypond-2.24.0/bin/convert-ly is a shell scr
t; and clicked Set as Default to make the 2.24.0 as the default.
>
> By choosing LilyPond -> Engrave, Frescobaldi runs LilyPond 2.24.0, not the
> older MacPort-installed 2.22.2., and I got anticipated syntax errors as my
> LilyPond code is written for 2.22.
>
> Then I choose
2.24.0, not the
older MacPort-installed 2.22.2., and I got anticipated syntax errors as my
LilyPond code is written for 2.22.
Then I choose Tools -> Update with convert-ly… but I cannot find LilyPond
2.24.0 in the pull down menu where you expect to choose the desired LilyPond
version. I f
> Am Mittwoch, den 17. August 2022 um 13:13:44 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Orm
> Finnendahl:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after upgrading from lilpond 2.19 to 2.23, lilypond-invoke-editor and
> > convert-ly stopped working.
> >
> > In both cases I get
> >
> >
Hi,
I found the reason: In my installation the ~/bin folder was symlinked
to the bin folder of the lilypond installation and that threw it
off. The following change to the second line of the convert-ly and
lilypond-invoke-editor scripts fixes it to facilitate symlinks:
change
root="$(di
Hi,
after upgrading from lilpond 2.19 to 2.23, lilypond-invoke-editor and
convert-ly stopped working.
In both cases I get
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "~/bin/../libexec/convert-ly", line 24, in
import gettext
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gettext'
Hi;
I have run 2.23.9 convert-ly successfully for one set of 2.22.2
engraving files after having fixed my stupid/incorrect merge of the
two 2.23.9 downloads (the package and the docs).
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:01 AM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> Hi David;
>
> I se
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kenneth Wolcott
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ~/Downloads/lilypond-2.23.9/bin/convert-ly
> > > ../../lp_2.22.2/source/Twelve_Days_of_Christmas_arranged_for_Brass_Quintet.ly
> > > > ./Twelve_Days_of_Christmas_arrang
On Tue 24 May 2022 at 23:10:36 (-0700), Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kenneth Wolcott
> wrote:
> >
> > ~/Downloads/lilypond-2.23.9/bin/convert-ly
> > ../../lp_2.22.2/source/Twelve_Days_of_Christmas_arran
Hi;
I also tried to run convert-ly from its "installed" location and the
same error message is the result.
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> ~/Downloads/lilypond-2.23.9/bin/convert-ly
> ../
~/Downloads/lilypond-2.23.9/bin/convert-ly
../../lp_2.22.2/source/Twelve_Days_of_Christmas_arranged_for_Brass_Quintet.ly
> ./Twelve_Days_of_Christmas_arranged_for_Brass_Quintet.ly
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/kwolcott/Downloads/lilypond-2.23.9/bin/../libexec/convert-l
At 20:26 03/06/2021 +0200, Hans Aikema wrote:
Ah you're right on that, overlooked the first entry. But fairly
certain that the statement on not interpreting the wildcard holds
(It's a difference between Windows and shells like bash that is
often overlooked - in bash the shell takes care of expa
> On 3 Jun 2021, at 09:21, Brian Barker wrote:
>
> At 07:22 03/06/2021 +0200, Hans Aikema wrote:
>> the convert-ly script does not interpret wildcards, but requires the file
>> explicitly. The way you call it makes it look for a file that is named *.ly
>> (wh
r: *.ly: Unable to open file
> convert-ly.py: warning: There was 1 error.
>
> C:\Users\Jerry\Documents\RPC\Music\Christmas>
> ===
>
> There are 34 LilyPond files (all ending with .ly) in this folder. However,
> the multi-word names are separated by dashes, as in
> "It-
At 07:22 03/06/2021 +0200, Hans Aikema wrote:
the convert-ly script does not interpret wildcards, but requires the
file explicitly. The way you call it makes it look for a file that
is named *.ly (which can never be present as * is not an allowed
character for a filename)
Thanks for this
with .ly) in this folder. However,
> the multi-word names are separated by dashes, as in
> "It-Came-Upon-A-Midnight-Clear.ly". Does this confuse convert-ly?
> Am I missing something else?
>
> Jerry
Jerry,
the convert-ly script does not interpret wildcards, but require
t;. Does this confuse convert-ly?
Am I missing something else?
Jerry
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Brian Barker
wrote:
> At 15:18 31/05/2021 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
> >Then rename convert-ly to convert-ly.py. Windows won't be able to
> >know that it's a Python pro
At 15:18 31/05/2021 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
Then rename convert-ly to convert-ly.py. Windows won't be able to
know that it's a Python program otherwise.
*Again*, I don't have this problem: I'm just trying to encourage
accurate responses to others. Did you not notice th
Then rename convert-ly to convert-ly.py. Windows won't be able to know that
it's a Python program otherwise.
--
Knute Snortum
On Mon, May 31, 2021, 2:00 PM Brian Barker
wrote:
> At 13:38 31/05/2021 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
> >First off, you have "C:\Program Files (x
aced there in the 2.22
Windows installation is named convert-ly, not convert-ly.py. That's
the questioner's problem - or at least one of them.
Brian Barker
ers\Jerry\Documents\RPC\Music\FILE>echo %PATH%
>> C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\WINDOWS\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\WINDOWS\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Program
>> Files
>> (x86)\LilyPond\usr\bin;C:\Users\Jerry\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;
&
Python is in Lilypond's bin folder which you already put in your path.
On my Windows 10 VM system (multiple versions of lilypond installed) the
command convert-ly worked (no explicit python invocation and no need for the
.py extension suffix)
I'll see if I still have some virgin sna
m32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\WINDOWS\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Program
> Files
> (x86)\LilyPond\usr\bin;C:\Users\Jerry\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;
>
> C:\Users\Jerry\Documents\RPC\Music\FILE>convert-ly *.ly
> 'convert-ly' is not recognized as an internal or external c
\Music\FILE>echo %PATH%
C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\WINDOWS\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\WINDOWS\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Program
Files
(x86)\LilyPond\usr\bin;C:\Users\Jerry\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;
C:\Users\Jerry\Documents\RPC\Music\FILE>conv
At 11:04 31/05/2021 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
I suggest you rename the file to that, ...
For what it's worth, I didn't have this problem: that was Jerry
Starks. Is he now happy? I was merely concerned that I was watching a
conversation that seemed to include no doubt well-intentioned but
m
> >>>>Hi Ralph,
> >>>>I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10
> >>>>Pro, 10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'convert-ly
> >>>>is not recognized...". Am I missing something obvious?
> >
still get the same response: " 'convert-ly
is not recognized...". Am I missing something obvious?
I think so. The name of the file is convert-ly.py, ...
Are you sure? In my Windows 10 installation of Lilypond 2.22.1, the
only file called "convert-ly" (in C:\Program File
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 8:25 AM Brian Barker wrote:
>
> At 09:31 31/05/2021 -0400, Tim Slattery wrote:
> >On 30 May 2021 at 17:50, JxStarks wrote:
> >>Hi Ralph,
> >>I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
> >>10.0.19041 and
At 09:31 31/05/2021 -0400, Tim Slattery wrote:
On 30 May 2021 at 17:50, JxStarks wrote:
Hi Ralph,
I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'convert-ly is not
recognized...". Am I missing something o
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:59 AM wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2021 at 17:50, JxStarks wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
> > 10.0.19041 and I still get the
> > same res
On 30 May 2021 at 17:50, JxStarks wrote:
>
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
> 10.0.19041 and I still get the
> same response: " 'convert-ly is not recognized...". Am I missing something
> o
naries locationOn 31 May 2021, at 00:44, JxStarks <jxsta...@gmail.com> wrote:Here's a screenshot:On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 5:50 PM JxStarks <jxsta...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Ralph,I read that documentation and tried it.
I'm running Windows 10 Pro, 10.0.19041 and I still get th
May 2021, at 00:44, JxStarks <jxsta...@gmail.com> wrote:Here's a screenshot:On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 5:50 PM JxStarks <jxsta...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Ralph,I read that documentation and tried it.
I'm running Windows 10 Pro, 10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'conv
that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
>> 10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'convert-ly is not
>> recognized...". Am I missing something obvious?
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 4:43 P
ote:
>>
>> Hi Ralph,
>>
>> I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
>> 10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'convert-ly is not
>> recognized...". Am I missing something obvious?
>>
>> Jerry
>&
Here's a screenshot:
[image: image.png]
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 5:50 PM JxStarks wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
> 10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'convert-ly is not
> recogniz
Hi Ralph,
I read that documentation and tried it. I'm running Windows 10 Pro,
10.0.19041 and I still get the same response: " 'convert-ly is not
recognized...". Am I missing something obvious?
Jerry
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 4:43 PM Ralph Palmer
wrote:
>
>
> On
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 1:24 PM JxStarks wrote:
> What's the trick for using convert-ly in a Windows Command Prompt window?
> I copied the convert-ly file into the directory where I want to convert
> everything in it, and entered convert-ly *.ly. This produced the error
> mess
What's the trick for using convert-ly in a Windows Command Prompt window? I
copied the convert-ly file into the directory where I want to convert
everything in it, and entered convert-ly *.ly. This produced the error
message " 'convert-ly' is not recognized as an internal
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 4:27 PM keith Luke wrote:
>
> Have any Windows 10 LP2.22.0 successfully run convert-ly?
>
> I uninstalled LP2.22.0 and reinstalled it in c:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPond
> Here is my Path variable:
>
> PATH=C:\Program Files
> (x86)\LilyPond;C:\WIN
> `convert-ly` is a python script. For Windows, rename the file
>
> c:\Program Files (x86)\usr\bin\convert-ly
>
> to
>
> convert-ly.py
>
> Then Windows will know to run the python interpreter on this file.
>
> NOTE: This script works as is on Linux becau
Thanks, Dan. Renaming convert-ly to convert-ly.py worked.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:07 PM Daniel Connors wrote:
> convert-ly is a python script. For Windows, rename *the file c:\Program
> Files (x86)\usr\bin\convert-ly to convert-ly.py*
>
> *Then Windows will know to ru
convert-ly is a python script. For Windows, rename *the file c:\Program
Files (x86)\usr\bin\convert-ly to convert-ly.py*
*Then Windows will know to run the python interpreter on this file.*
*NOTE: This script works as is on Linux because the first line of the
script says to run python on the
Have any Windows 10 LP2.22.0 successfully run convert-ly?
I uninstalled LP2.22.0 and reinstalled it in *c:\Program Files
(x86)\LilyPond*
Here is my Path variable:
PATH=C:\Program Files
(x86)\LilyPond;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\WINDOWS\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;c:\sysinternals
On Tue, Jan 12 2021 at 10:39:40 PM +, Michael Hendry
wrote:
Could the problem be the “>” sign in the path reported in the
error message?
C:\LilyPond220\usr\bin>convert-ly -e alice2.ly
I think it's the command line prompt symbol. In other words, he entered
that directory a
> On 12 Jan 2021, at 20:12, keith Luke wrote:
>
> I just installed lilypond 2.20.0 and tried running convert-ly to update old
> versions of scores.
>
> I get the following error messages:
>
> C:\LilyPond220\usr\bin>convert-ly -e alice2.ly
> 'convert-ly&#
On Tue, Jan 12 2021 at 10:12:04 AM -1000, keith Luke
wrote:
I just installed lilypond 2.20.0 and tried running convert-ly to
update old versions of scores.
I get the following error messages:
C:\LilyPond220\usr\bin>convert-ly -e alice2.ly
'convert-ly' is not recognized as a
I just installed lilypond 2.20.0 and tried running convert-ly to update old
versions of scores.
I get the following error messages:
C:\LilyPond220\usr\bin>convert-ly -e alice2.ly
'convert-ly' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
wing
>>>> error message is produced:
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>> File
>>>> "/Applications/LilyPond_2.21.4..app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-ly",
>>>> line 86
directly from the application
>>> and using Update Syntax” from the “Compile” menu, applying it to the
>>> “Welcome to Lilypond” file after renaming it “test 1.ly”, the following
>>> error message is produced:
>>>
>>> -
>>> Traceback (mos
date Syntax” from the “Compile” menu, applying it to the
>> “Welcome to Lilypond” file after renaming it “test 1.ly”, the following
>> error message is produced:
>>
>> -
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File
>> "/Applications/Lil
ter renaming it “test 1.ly”, the following error message
> is produced:
>
> -
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/Applications/LilyPond_2.21.4..app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-ly", line
> 86, in
> import convertrules
> File
>
is
produced:
-
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Applications/LilyPond_2.21.4..app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-ly",
line 86, in
import convertrules
File
"/Applications/LilyPond_2.21.4..app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/python/convertrule
ecent call last):
File "/Applications/LilyPond_2.21.4..app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-ly",
line 86, in
import convertrules
File
"/Applications/LilyPond_2.21.4..app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/python/convertrules.py",
line 26, in
import lilylib
F
Toye wrote:
>
> I've just used convert-ly to convert 2.19.2 to 2.21.0. And an extra newline
> (x0D0A) has been added to every line. Odd, though, two consecutive newlines
> are replaced by three. This is obviously a bit of a pain - any way of
> stopping it?
>
> I'
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 11:19, Peter Toye wrote:
>
> I've just used convert-ly to convert 2.19.2 to 2.21.0. And an extra
newline (x0D0A) has been added to every line. Odd, though, two consecutive
newlines are replaced by three. This is obviously a bit of a pain - any way
of stopping it?
I've just used convert-ly to convert 2.19.2 to 2.21.0. And an extra newline
(x0D0A) has been added to every line. Odd, though, two consecutive newlines are
replaced by three. This is obviously a bit of a pain - any way of stopping it?
I'm on Windows 10, which may well be significant.
e-
> From: Michael Gerdau [mailto:m...@qata.de]
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 4:09 AM
> To: John Schlomann; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Running convert-ly on WIndows
>
> Hi John,
>
> I don't have this problem.
>
> > I've just installed 2.20.0
Hi John,
I don't have this problem.
> I've just installed 2.20.0 on Windows 10. I've been using 2.18.2. When I try
> to run convert-ly I get an error from line 61:
[snipped]
Care to share more details on what you do exactly?
Exact command, where you invoke it etc. pp.
Dear Ponders,
I'm sure this has been addressed before, but I can't seem to find the
answer.
I've just installed 2.20.0 on Windows 10. I've been using 2.18.2. When I try
to run convert-ly I get an error from line 61:
Import lilylib as ly
No module named l
% convert-ly
ImportError: Bad magic number in
/Applications/Frescobaldi.app/Contents/Resources/site.pyc
LilyPond 2.20.0
LilyPond 2.19.84
macOS 10.15.4
When I use the command from Frecobaldi (3.1.1) I get the following:
arch: posix_spawnp:
/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework
o: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Convert-ly adds line breaks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suspect this is a Unix vs. Windows line ending issue.
>
> That's exactly what it is. The Frescobaldi project has an open issue for
> this that I just commented on earlier t
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Neubauer [mailto:mrtn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 2:11 PM
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Convert-ly adds line breaks
>
> Hi,
>
> I suspect this is a Unix vs. Windows line ending issue.
Tha
;
>> Mark
>>
> Hello Mark,
>
> 1. Start a command Window (cmd)
> 2. change the current directory to directory>\usr\bin
> 3. type convert-ly.py -e
> (4 Press enter )
>
> The original file will be renamed ~
>
> The converted file will get
Anders,
Thanks for teaching a old dog some new tricks!
Mark
From: Anders Eriksson [mailto:lilyp...@andis59.se]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 12:24 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Convert-ly adds line breaks
On 2020-03-15 20:18, Mark Stephen Mrotek
*To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
*Subject:* Re: Convert-ly adds line breaks
On 2020-03-15 18:48, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Mark,
The same happened when I used convert.ly.
Mark
*From:*lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] *On
Behalf Of *M
: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Convert-ly adds line breaks
On 2020-03-15 18:48, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Mark,
The same happened when I used convert.ly.
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Mark Mathias
Sent
Hi,
I suspect this is a Unix vs. Windows line ending issue. Maybe you can
either run some utility like dos2unix (or whatever is available for
windows these days) prior to running convert-ly, or confirm which line
terminators are used before and after running convert-ly via some
hexdump utility
:* Convert-ly adds line breaks
Running Frescobaldi 3.1.1 "Update with convert-ly" from LilyPond
2.18.2 to 2.20.0 added an extra line break to every line of the .ly
file (Windows10). I can strip them out of course, but is there a way
to avoid this? Couldn't find anything
Mark,
The same happened when I used convert.ly.
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Mark Mathias
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 3:26 AM
To: lilypond-usermailinglist
Subject: Convert-ly adds line breaks
Running
Running Frescobaldi 3.1.1 "Update with convert-ly" from LilyPond 2.18.2 to
2.20.0 added an extra line break to every line of the .ly file (Windows10).
I can strip them out of course, but is there a way to avoid this? Couldn't
find anything in Frescobaldi preferences that covers t
Am Donnerstag, 26. Dezember 2019 19:08 CET, "Peter Gentry"
schrieb:
> Thinking I would learn more about python I installed Visual Studio.
>
>
>
> Now when I try and run the batch file I get
>
>
>
> SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean
> print(log[0])?
You are tryin
1 - 100 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
