On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:55:22 -0700, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 27 September 2010 19:47, Carl Sorensen wrote:
The following code beams properly, without the override. But it also
reports a warning message:
warning: cannot find or create `Timing' called `'
\cadenzaOn only works if there's either
On 27 September 2010 19:47, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> This is a very interesting issue.
> The following code beams properly, without the override. But it also
> reports a warning message:
>
> warning: cannot find or create `Timing' called `'
\cadenzaOn only works if there's either an explicitly in
Keith,
Thanks for an excellent report.
On 9/27/10 11:51 AM, "Keith E OHara" wrote:
> In "First impressions of alpha test" I wrote:
> My old scores had two situations with missing beams, neither one is a
> simple
> regression:
>
> 1) swung triplets in 2/8 are not beamed. Both 2.12 and 2.13 ar
In "First impressions of alpha test" I wrote:
The auto-beaming seems to beam a little less often than the
old system.
My old scores had two situations with missing beams, neither one is a
simple
regression:
1) swung triplets in 2/8 are not beamed. Both 2.12 and 2.13 are missing
beams, but
