On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:35:23 -0700, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
Maybe our scores differ so much that there are no settings good for all of
them.
Time to finish this up.
I think the attached very short set of overrides are a good compromise, which
we can all use until the final stages of tweaking. I
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:35:23 -0700, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
Maybe our scores differ so much that there are no settings good for all of
them.
Time to finish this up.
I think the attached very short set of overrides are a good compromise, which
we can all use until the final stages of tweaking. I
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:35:23 -0700, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
2010/11/3 Keith E OHara
I don't fully understand... Are you refering to the lyricsStaff.png picture?
Yes. You understood correctly. (I confused th order of the pictures)
[ . . . ] In this case
they should be centered (because they a
2010/11/3 Keith E OHara
> On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:19:32 -0700, Jan Warchoł <
> lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As for me the attached settings work quite well. In particular your Lyric
>
>> spacing settings didn't produce good results when lyrics were centered
>> between two staves, so
Keith E OHara wrote Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:45 AM
I think we still want enough 'minimum-distance to the lower staff
so that Lyrics are always a little closer to the Staff they are
associated with, than they are to the next lower staff. Is that
what you intended, or do people reading
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:19:32 -0700, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
As for me the attached settings work quite well. In particular your Lyric
spacing settings didn't produce good results when lyrics were centered
between two staves, so I changed them.
Good. I was expecting that you would increase the '
Hi,
sorry it took so long... Looks like it's not possible to achieve some
results that i wanted only with changing default values for spacing
algorithm.
As for me the attached settings work quite well. In particular your Lyric
spacing settings didn't produce good results when lyrics were centered
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:25:31 -0700, Nick Payne
wrote:
... However, I don't like the resulting look of the
output, as the space between the bottom stave on each page and the foot
of the page varies too much for my taste.
The simplest way to ask LilyPond to stretch big orchestral systems a lit
On 29/10/10 06:27, Keith E OHara wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:01:26 -0700, Nick wrote:
Actually, the vertical layout problem I reported a few weeks ago
(http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1252) still exists
with 2.13.37.
Nick,
Since it seems you actually let LilyPond choose
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Keith E OHara wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:01:26 -0700, Nick wrote:
>
> Actually, the vertical layout problem I reported a few weeks ago
>> (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1252) still exists
>> with 2.13.37.
>>
>
> The information in the b
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:01:26 -0700, Nick wrote:
Actually, the vertical layout problem I reported a few weeks ago
(http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1252) still exists
with 2.13.37.
The information in the bug tracker indicates that, when LilyPond plans how many
systems to put
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:48:06 -0700, Keith E OHara wrote:
1) The systems (that is, the sets of staffs that are being played at the same
time)are stretched too much compared to the space between the systems. If
there is only one system on the page, it is stretched to fill the page.
(attached
On 28/10/10 15:48, Keith E OHara wrote:
Friends of the forthcoming Lilypond 2.14,
The third alpha version, 2.13.37, has resolved the obvious problems in
the spacing mechanism. The default spacing, though, could use some
adjustment. Now is our opportunity to recommend good defaults.
Actuall
Friends of the forthcoming Lilypond 2.14,
The third alpha version, 2.13.37, has resolved the obvious problems in the
spacing mechanism. The default spacing, though, could use some adjustment.
Now is our opportunity to recommend good defaults.
I have been having fun testing the alpha version
14 matches
Mail list logo
