Le mercredi 19 avril 2023 à 23:09 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> on https://twitter.com/spagnolo_mic/status/1648702871112671232, someone
> (obviously a MuseScore developer) posted an analysis of a
> Sibelius/MuseScore comparison.
>
> I took the liberty of adding a LilyPond ver
Resending this reply with further compressed pngs, as it was rejected for
size.
Hello Lukas,
quite nice to see how much MuseScore has improved (although I dislike the
direction they are going in overall terms of usability).
We see here though that optical correction for such kneed Beams is muc
>> I happened to be checking tuplet notation in Gould today, and it
>> strikes me that the default LilyPond treatment of tuplet brackets
>> shown by that example does not follow her clear default rule (which
>> is also stated by Ross, and followed without comment by Stone and
>> loosely (!) by Rea
Le mercredi 19 avril 2023 à 23:13 +0100, Paul Hodges a écrit :
> I happened to be checking tuplet notation in Gould today, and it strikes me
> that the default LilyPond treatment of tuplet brackets shown by that example
> does not follow her clear default rule (which is also stated by Ross, and
From: Lukas-Fabian Moser
on https://twitter.com/spagnolo_mic/status/1648702871112671232, someone
(obviously a MuseScore developer) posted an analysis of a
Sibelius/MuseScore comparison.
I took the liberty of adding a LilyPond version in case anybody is
interested, compiled with today
