Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-07 Thread Jason Yip
On 2024-11-07 12:06, Richard Gress - rgress(a)nd.edu wrote: Jason, the new commands as presented in the 2.25 docs makes more sense than in 2.24, and doesn't require timing commands - bravo to you and whoever else worked on this. Thank you! The English instructions have a few grammatical error

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-07 Thread Richard Gress
nInterval to anything other than a \musiclength = X? From: Jason Yip Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 10:54 AM To: Leo Correia de Verdier Cc: Richard Gress ; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets On 2024-

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-07 Thread Jason Yip
On 2024-11-06 23:35, Leo Correia de Verdier - leo.correia.de.verdier(a)gmail.com wrote: What is needed is for the secondary beam (the sixteenth beam) to be broken between each quintuplet group in the first measure of the left hand. It looks like this won't be possible at the moment. I am still

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-07 Thread David Kastrup
Jason Yip writes: >> % Here is where the problem occurs. We're in 9/8 time. >>   \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 3/32) >>   \set beatStructure = 2,2,2,2 % Whatever I set this to does > > Did you try running the latest development version of Lilypond? I have > attached the output of y

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-06 Thread Leo Correia de Verdier
What is needed is for the secondary beam (the sixteenth beam) to be broken between each quintuplet group in the first measure of the left hand. > 7 nov. 2024 kl. 06:11 skrev Jason Yip : > > On 2024-11-06 10:57, Richard Gress - rgress(a)nd.edu wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> I'm engraving a measure o

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-06 Thread Leo Correia de Verdier
The subdivision works well without the manual beaming (the square brackets), but as Carl says it’s probably impossible to subdivide just the secondary beam automatically at non-powers-of-a-half: % \relative c { \time 9/8 \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:m

Re: Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 2:05 PM Richard Gress wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm engraving a measure of Sorabji's First Symphony for Organ. In the left > hand part, beams should be subdivided each dotted sixteenth note. However, > the current behavior is that the beams are subdivided every beat (3 eigh

Subdivided beaming not correct with compound meter and tuplets

2024-11-06 Thread Richard Gress
Hi everyone, I'm engraving a measure of Sorabji's First Symphony for Organ. In the left hand part, beams should be subdivided each dotted sixteenth note. However, the current behavior is that the beams are subdivided every beat (3 eighth notes in 9/8 time.) Here's my example. I will trim it dow