8 -1-3 ( 16 -2-4 -1-5 -2-4 -3-5 )
}
%%% END %%%
[image: Fingering-avoid-slur-ignore.png]
Trevor.
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 10:25 AM Paul McKay wrote:
> Hi
> I want to show fingerings in front of slurs in a manner very like that
> demonstrated in the "Using the whiteout property&q
On 2024-09-27 17:14, David Sumbler
wrote:
Thanks - that's perfect. The difficulty I had was that I
couldn't figure out what class of object an accent is. I had
already tried
\override
TextScript.avoid-slur =
> The difficulty I had was that I couldn't figure out what class of
> object an accent is. I had already tried
>
> \override TextScript.avoid-slur = #'inside
>
> but this of course doesn't work. I couldn't find out from the
> documentation how accents etc. are classified, although I expect it
On 27/09/2024 16:14, David Sumbler wrote:
On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 07:54 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:42 AM David Sumbler wrote:
How do I persuade Lilypond to position all accent marks inside
slurs? At the moment, in a passage containing numerous accents and
slurs
--
Knute Snortum
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:14 AM David Sumbler wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 07:54 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:42 AM David Sumbler wrote:
>
> How do I persuade Lilypond to position all accent marks inside slurs
On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 07:54 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:42 AM David Sumbler
> wrote:
> > How do I persuade Lilypond to position all accent marks inside
> > slurs? At the moment, in a passage containing numerous accents and
> > sl
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:42 AM David Sumbler wrote:
> How do I persuade Lilypond to position all accent marks inside slurs? At
> the moment, in a passage containing numerous accents and slurs, I am
> finding that some accents are outside the slur and some inside, which looks
> a m
How do I persuade Lilypond to position all accent marks inside slurs?
At the moment, in a passage containing numerous accents and slurs, I
am finding that some accents are outside the slur and some inside,
which looks a mess!
David
;a" c''4_( s s s \change Staff = "c" c'')
}
\new Staff = "b" s1*3
\new Staff = "c" s1*3
>>
}
%%%
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2024, 03:34:17 MESZ schrieb William Rehwinkel via
LilyPond user discussion:
> De
Dear list,
In the following example, is there a way to make the slurs reach across
all the staves to reach both notes?
I'm very sorry, I could have sworn that I could make slurs across staves
work correctly in the past, but I must have forgotten.
Thanks,
-William
% --
\ve
quot;cpts" #'() ^( s) }{ g4 } >>
\break g4\jsShape "2" "cpts" #'() ( a b c-)
}
}
%
HTH!
Paolo
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 7:45 PM bobr...@centrum.is
wrote:
> I think I may have run across a bug/limitation of Spontini. I was
> adjusting slurs.
I think I may have run across a bug/limitation of Spontini. I was adjusting
slurs. When I adjusted one that occurred over a line break I got unexpected
results. I eventually figured out that only the part before the line break was
changing even if I only moved the control points of the slur
arsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f
> could perhaps also be an option.
>
> > 13 juni 2024 kl. 16:49 skrev Federico Sarudiansky :
> >
> > Hi again, Kieren!
> >
> > Excellent! However I wonder if there is a more general approach.
> Something «allowing» the s
Hi Leo (and Federico!),
> Setting
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f
> could perhaps also be an option.
Oh, yes… much better than my “nuclear” \ignore option!
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override RehearsalMark.outside
Setting
\override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f
could perhaps also be an option.
> 13 juni 2024 kl. 16:49 skrev Federico Sarudiansky :
>
> Hi again, Kieren!
>
> Excellent! However I wonder if there is a more general approach. Something
> «allowing» th
Hi Federico,
> How can I overlap the perfect tie (slur) in A with the mark position in B and
> C so to use the .whiteout and .layer properties to put the slur/tie behind
> the mark and save some vertical space?
Maybe something like this…?
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
\relative c'''
Hi Federico,
> However I wonder if there is a more general approach. Something «allowing»
> the slurs not taking the rehearsal marks into consideration when defining its
> shape parameters.
This is fairly “nuclear”, but:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
ignoreV
Hi again, Kieren!
Excellent! However I wonder if there is a more general approach. Something
«allowing» the slurs not taking the rehearsal marks into consideration when
defining its shape parameters.
All the best!
F.
El jue, 13 jun 2024 a las 11:28, Kieren MacMillan (<
Hi.
Please consider the following:
\version "2.25.15"
\relative c''' {
g1~ \mark \default g1
\override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = #1
\override Tie.outside-staff-priority = #2
g1~ \mark \default g1
\override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #2
g1 ( \mark \default e1 )
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:05 AM Paul McKay wrote:
> Hi
> I want to show the fingering in front of the slurs. This should keep the
> fingerings evenly spaced vertically over the notes. I have tried the
> following :
>
> \version "2.24.0"
> \language "english&
Hi
I want to show fingerings in front of slurs in a manner very like that
demonstrated in the "Using the whiteout property" snippet
This is what I've tried:
\version "2.24.0"
\language "english"
\relative {
\override Staff.Fingering.layer = 2
Hi
I want to show the fingering in front of the slurs. This should keep the
fingerings evenly spaced vertically over the notes. I have tried the
following :
\version "2.24.0"
\language "english"
\relative {
\override Staff.Fingering.layer = 2 % fingering sh
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 10:55 PM Robert Garrigos wrote:
> Oh this is a bit embarrassing, such a basic error….. sorry, I never
> realized that the parenthesis needs to be right after the first note.
>
Nothing to be embarrassed about. It takes some getting used to.
--
Knute Snortum
anfear
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 2:15 PM
> To: Robert Garrigos ; LilyPond Users
>
> Subject: Re: slurs problem with voices
>
> On 01/05/2024 21:57, Robert Garrigos wrote:
>>
>> Why is not the first example working? I tried with explicit voicing with the
>
, May 1, 2024 2:15 PM
To: Robert Garrigos ; LilyPond Users
Subject: Re: slurs problem with voices
On 01/05/2024 21:57, Robert Garrigos wrote:
Why is not the first example working? I tried with explicit voicing with the
same results.
Thanks.
Robert
The slur starts at the d2 so must be
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Robert Garrigos wrote:
> I have this music to engrave, note the slur:
> [...]
> Why is not the first example working? I tried with explicit voicing with
> the same results.
>
Slurs in LilyPond are "post events", meaning they always go *aft
On 01/05/2024 21:57, Robert Garrigos wrote:
Why is not the first example working? I tried with explicit voicing with the
same results.
Thanks.
Robert
The slur starts at the d2 so must be placed with that note following the
pitch and duration,
{ d4 d2( | \hideNotes ef8)}
--
Timothy Lanfea
Hi Robert,
> I tried different approaches but cannot get that slur.
\version "2.25.14"
\language "english"
global = {
\key ef \minor
\time 3/4
}
\relative c' {
\clef treble
\global
<<
{ bf'4 cf2 \tweak staff-position #5.1 ~ | 8 8 r8 r8 }
\\
{ d4 d2( | \hideNotes ef8) }
I have this music to engrave, note the slur:
I tried different approaches but cannot get that slur. This is my code, with
two examples:
\version "2.25.14"
\language "english"
global = {
\key ef \minor
\time 3/4
}
first_example = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\global
<<
{bf'4 \once
Hi Ben,
> I read the 2005 article in the Linux journal about making schenkerian graphs,
> and I feel like it covered everything except one type of slur. I think I've
> heard it called a swan slur before. It's a slur that hooks around a note. In
> this picture it's the slur connecting the e flat
Hello,
I read the 2005 article in the Linux journal about making schenkerian
graphs, and I feel like it covered everything except one type of slur. I
think I've heard it called a swan slur before. It's a slur that hooks
around a note. In this picture it's the slur connecting the e flat in the
bass
Il giorno dom 3 mar 2024 alle ore 18:36 Jean Brefort
ha scritto:
>
> Try this:
> c''1:32( | c1:32 )( | c1:32 )( | c4 ) r4 r2 |
>
> you only need three slurs not four.
Works great, thanks.
Il giorno dom 3 mar 2024 alle ore 18:32 David Kastrup ha scritto:
>
Try this:
c''1:32( | c1:32 )( | c1:32 )( | c4 ) r4 r2 |
you only need three slurs not four.
Hope this helps,
Jean Brefort (not the
Le dimanche 03 mars 2024 à 18:20 +0100, Gerardo Ballabio a écrit :
> Hello,
> please what is the correct way to draw multiple slurs connected
Gerardo Ballabio writes:
> Hello,
> please what is the correct way to draw multiple slurs connected to
> each other? Look at example below to see what I mean (result
> attached).
>
> The following code does what I want but it gives multiple warnings like these:
>
>
Hello,
please what is the correct way to draw multiple slurs connected to
each other? Look at example below to see what I mean (result
attached).
The following code does what I want but it gives multiple warnings like these:
Parsing...
slur.ly:4:3: warning: Unattached SlurEvent
Interpreting
On 1/7/2024 4:11 PM, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
\once \override Dots.avoid-slur = #'ignore
(Dots instead of Slur)
Thank you! That’s what I was misunderstanding.
—Joel
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 21:35, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>
> Reposting for clarity as to what I’m asking.
>
> In the second case below, instead of the slur attaching to the specific
note, it moves vertically—I assume, to avoid collision with the duration
dot. (Though it’s interesting that a tie does n
Hello Joel
You can shape the Slur manually, like so:
\version "2.25.11"
\fixed c' {
% undotted note: slur attaches correctly
2
|
% dotted note: slur is moved vertically
\shape #'((1 . 0.5) (0.5 . 0.3) (0.5 . 0.3) (0 . 0)) Slur %adjusting
the numbers control the four control points
Reposting for clarity as to what I’m asking.
In the second case below, instead of the slur attaching to the specific
note, it moves vertically—I assume, to avoid collision with the duration
dot. (Though it’s interesting that a tie does not mind overlapping the
dot, as in the fourth case.)
I
I should have been clearer. The score I’m trying to emulate has slurs—
|4. |
—and it’s the vertical movement of the slurs I’m trying to avoid.
The fact that ties will overlap the note dots was a curiosity I found in
trying to boil that down to a minimal working example.
—Joel
On 1/4/2024
Joel:
Is this better?
\fixed c' {
2
|
2.
4 |
2 q |
2. q4 |
}
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Joel C.
Salomon
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 6:11 PM
To: LilyPond Users
Subject: Slurs within chords
Somewhat surprising result, tested on 2.24 & 2.25.11:
|```
\version "2.24"
\fixed c' {
2
|
2.
4 |
2 q |
2. q4 |
}
```|
In the second instance, the tie attaches to the bottom of the initial
chord, presumably to avoid colliding with the dot. (Interestingly, as in
examples 3 & 4,
Hi Peter,
What can I do to avoid the outer slur colliding with the inner slurs?
Code the inner slurs as Slurs and the *outer* slur as a PhrasingSlur,
rather than the other way around (as you did):
f4\p\( aes8( des16. c32) |
c8.( bes32 aes) g8\) r8 |
As a secondary question, I always
As a beginner at Lilypond, this is the first time I have seen something
that looks a little ugly "out of the box" (unless, of course, I am doing
something wrong!)
What can I do to avoid the outer slur colliding with the inner slurs?
As a secondary question, I always find that wh
David,
Wow, so simple.
Thank you for the remedy.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2023 2:44 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: slurs
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
> Hello All:
>
>
&
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
> Hello All:
>
>
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative c'' {
>
> \slurDown 4
>
> (bes16) (a c bes d c ees d)
>
> }
Good example why it is a bad idea to use non-standard input formatting
for aesthetic reasons: you lose a proper idea about what you are
actually
Hello All:
\version "2.22.2"
\relative c'' {
\slurDown 4
(bes16) (a c bes d c ees d)
}
Produces this
What must be done to produce this?
Thank you for your assistance.
Mark
Le jeudi 17 août 2023 à 12:38 -0400, Jin Choi a écrit :
> and also discussion of being able to do it in Frescobaldi under Layout Control
> Mode, which appears to have moved to Tools/Viewers/Layout Control Options but
> now has no option for displaying control points.
The reason it was removed is t
It was “Adjusting slurs and ties in LilyPond”, from this group’s archives:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-10/pdfn4OnsjHZAm.pdf
Some of the features look very handy to describe control points as polar
coordinates, but I don’t want to drop in a whole mass of code just for
> Le 16 août 2023 à 18:52, Jin Choi a écrit :
>
> I came across a PDF describing updates to \shape that let you use head
> centered coordinates and polar coordinates that would make this easier. But
> my 2.24.0 version of lilypond doesn’t seem to include \shapeII. What is the
> status of th
the status of
that?
On Aug 16, 2023, at 5:33 AM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Hi Jin,
Am 16.08.23 um 04:48 schrieb Jin Choi:
Is it possible to get this style of s-curve shaped slurs across staves?
It's possible, but it's not fun.
\version "2.24.0"
\new PianoStaff
<
ser wrote:
>
> Hi Jin,
>
> Am 16.08.23 um 04:48 schrieb Jin Choi:
>> Is it possible to get this style of s-curve shaped slurs across staves?
>
> It's possible, but it's not fun.
>
> \version "2.24.0"
>
> \new PianoStaff
> <<
>
Hi Jin,
Am 16.08.23 um 04:48 schrieb Jin Choi:
Is it possible to get this style of s-curve shaped slurs across staves?
It's possible, but it's not fun.
\version "2.24.0"
\new PianoStaff
<<
\new Staff = upper {
<<
{
r8
\shape #'((
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM Jin Choi wrote:
> I see that it’s possible to place textual marks inside of slurs:
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/expressive-marks_003a-positioning-text-markups-inside-slurs
> Is it possible to get crescendo and decrescendo mar
Hi,
you could set the outside-staff-priority of the Slur:
\version "2.24.1"
top = { \change Staff = "upper" \voiceTwo }
bottom = { \change Staff = "lower" \voiceOne }
upper = \relative c' {
\key g \minor
\voiceOne
d'4.^\markup {\italic "espressivo"}^"a tempo"\p^- c8\tweak outside-staff-
pri
I see that it’s possible to place textual marks inside of slurs:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/expressive-marks_003a-positioning-text-markups-inside-slurs
Is it possible to get crescendo and decrescendo marks within slurs as well?
\version "2.24.1"
top = { \ch
>> Suprisingly, no – at least I couldn't find an entry. I've now created
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6631
>
> And there is now https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2043
>
> See, if you report problems, there is a chance they actually get
> fixed :-)
Wi
Le vendredi 16 juin 2023 à 20:21 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> Suprisingly, no – at least I couldn't find an entry. I've now created
>
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6631
And there is now https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2043
See, if you report problem
> Cough, cough. I have found this to work:
>
> ```
> \version "2.25.5"
>
> #(set-default-paper-size "a6")
>
> {
> d'4 e' g' d' |
> d'4 e' g' d'( ~ |
> \once \override Staff.KeySignature.break-visibility = #all-invisible
> \break
> d'4) e' f' d' |
> d'4 e' f' d' |
> }
> ```
Very int
Le vendredi 16 juin 2023 à 05:37 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> In my opinion, the worst flaw of LilyPond's otherwise excellent
> formatting, a flaw that essentially everyone encounters rather
> quickly, is that broken slurs are almost always shorter than broken
> ties (it
In my opinion, the worst flaw of LilyPond's otherwise excellent
formatting, a flaw that essentially everyone encounters rather
quickly, is that broken slurs are almost always shorter than broken
ties (it should be exactly the opposite), which is butt ugly and
sometimes really hampers readab
Yes, Gould does say to always place a slur outside a beam. And I’m fine with
that being Lilypond’s default behavior. But I’d love the ability to tell
Lilypond to place slurs inside of beams (when possible).
I do have one hymnal that prints slurs inside beams. I suspect that this
choice was
At 11:47 13/02/2023 -0800, Aaron Hill wrote:
I am quite used to LilyPond's default handling of slurs with them
positioned next to the beam, but should I be following the source
engraving with the slurs sit inside so they are closer to the note
heads? Does Gould offer advice on this?
To
Attached is an image showing an excerpt from a reference score as well
as output from LilyPond.
I am quite used to LilyPond's default handling of slurs with them
positioned next to the beam, but should I be following the source
engraving with the slurs sit inside so they are closer t
Hi Jon,
Am 22.01.23 um 03:31 schrieb Jon Arnold:
Thanks all! Separating the voices did fix the problem. I used this
score a long time ago and then updated the layout, so I feel like an
update several years ago must have changed the behavior, which is
interesting.
Compare:
\version "2.24"
m
11:59:06 (+1100), Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:32 Jon Arnold,
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey folks-
> > >
> > > Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
> > > part of the attached file? It first occurs
On Sun 22 Jan 2023 at 11:59:06 (+1100), Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:32 Jon Arnold, wrote:
>
> > Hey folks-
> >
> > Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
> > part of the attached file? It first occurs in the 2n
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:32 Jon Arnold, wrote:
> Hey folks-
>
> Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
> part of the attached file? It first occurs in the 2nd half of bar 7, bottom
> of page 3. It seems to be related to the barLiner function I have
s the
problem?
-Will
On 1/21/23 18:31, Jon Arnold wrote:
Hey folks-
Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
part of the attached file? It first occurs in the 2nd half of bar 7,
bottom of page 3. It seems to be related to the barLiner function I have
(it goes
27; {
\voiceTwo
g8 g') c,,8 c'8)
}
}
>>
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\remove "Slur_engraver"
\remove "Slur_performer"
}
\context {
\Staff
\consists "Slur_engraver"
\consi
>>
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\remove "Slur_engraver"
\remove "Slur_performer"
}
\context {
\Staff
\consists "Slur_engraver"
\consists "Slur_performer"
}
}
}
On 7/27/22 11:28, Jim Cline wrote:
I would l
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 8:29 AM Jim Cline wrote:
>
> I would like to create slurs between alternating notes across two voices
> in this example:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
> lower =
>\relative c {
> \time 3/4
>\clef bass
><<{\stemUp
I would like to create slurs between alternating notes across two voices
in this example:
\version "2.20.0"
lower =
\relative c {
\time 3/4
\clef bass
<<{\stemUp e''16\rest cis4 bis ais8~ais16}\\{\clef treble\stemDown
\slurDown e4 dis cis}>>|
}
Hi Kevin,
On 02/06/2022 22:56, Kevin Cole wrote:
The hand-written score I'm looking at shows an F# with three slurs
coming off of it going to each of the three notes in the following
measure. I tried the following but it only shows one slur. What did I
miss?
without context it’s hard to
Thanks for the suggestions.
I'm working from a 3-ring binder of songs collected via photocopying
and hand-transcription that a group of us used to sing and play from
30 years ago. I have no idea who scrawled this tune in. But, seeing as
how most (if not all) of us were amateurs, it is very possibl
your starting note has these
piled up after it like so: fs4~(\( . But the result is clashing slurs, so
you'll need to use the \shape tweak to adjust the position of at least one of
them.
But to me this seems a very odd way to write this...
Paul
From: Kevin Cole
To: lilypond-user m
Hi,
The hand-written score I'm looking at shows an F# with three slurs
coming off of it going to each of the three notes in the following
measure. I tried the following but it only shows one slur. What did I
miss?
\version "2.22.1"
\language "english"
\
Hi Stefan, hi Lukas,
I think it might be reasonable to directly annotate the Slurs instead. This
allows for nice placement, see the appended example.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Montag, 30. Mai 2022, 08:17:58 CEST schrieb Stefan E. Mueller:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> yes, that is what I need, I can tak
Hi Lukas,
yes, that is what I need, I can take it from there - many thanks for the
quick response and solution, and the explanations!
Stefan
--
Stefan E. Mueller
stefan.e.muel...@gmx.de
On Sun, 29 May 2022, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Am 29.05.22 um 22:42 schrieb Stefan E.
Hi Stefan,
Am 29.05.22 um 22:42 schrieb Stefan E. Mueller:
I am not sure yet what the difference between a scheme-function and a
music-function is (the second example seems to work whichever definition
is chosen).
A music function must return music, a scheme function can return more
general exp
he (optional)
spacing first:
\version "2.22"
ho = #(define-music-function
(spacing music)
((number? -1.5) ly:music?)
#{
<>-^(^\markup {\halign #spacing ho}
#music
#})
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho #-2.5 f''8 a'')
}
\new Staff
ng ho}
#music
#})
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho #-2.5 f''8 a'')
}
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho f''8 a'')
}
Here, I have used the "empty chord trick": <> is an empty chord that
doesn't take up time; any slurs a
When notating guitar music, I use a slur with a markup to indicate
hammer-ons, pull-offs, slides or bendings, like in this example:
\new Staff {
e''8^(^\markup {\halign #-1.5 ho} f''8)
}
I'd like to define a scheme function for the slur and markup, such that I
can write
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho f'
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 18:39, Trinton a écrit :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Since adding dashed slurs to my score using the \slurDashed command, I've
> been unable to concatenate the segments of my score, getting this error:
> [48]ERROR: Wrong type (expecting exact integer)
Hi folks,
Since adding dashed slurs to my score using the \slurDashed command, I've
been unable to concatenate the segments of my score, getting this error:
[48]ERROR: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #
I've not been able to find any hints about this message in the docs. What&#x
\afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
Richard
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 09:13 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have
> a symbol attached to the note (which I should have i
Sorry for the hour!
It's a matter of parenthesis order and spaces:
\relative c' {
\afterGrace g4-+( { a16 g16) }
}
This works for me
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 10:13 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 10:00 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur
> inside
> the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
well I got there because it said the error was in column 30, i.e. the
closing ) and I suspected that those ar
Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur inside
the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
Again, thanks.
Alasdair
On Sunday 06 February 2022 20:53:12 (+11:00), Richard Shann wrote:
>
>
> \afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
>
> Richard
>
> On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 09:13
Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early evening).
I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have a symbol
attached to the note (which I should have included in my example):
\afterGrace g4-+( {a16 g16} )
I've tried moving the beginning of the slur to direc
Good morning,
try:
\afterGrace g4( { a16 g16) }
The slur event must be attached directly after the note.
Rip_mus
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 08:59 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> This works:
> g4( \grace {a16 g16})
>
> making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get the
> right spac
This works:
g4( \grace {a16 g16})
making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get the
right spacing and barring (I need grace notes to occur before the bar line,
rather than after), I need to use "afterGrace":
\afterGrace g4 {a16 g16}
However, if I attempt to include a slu
Hello,
Suppose that I have a slur that must be placed ABOVE a note which is part
of a a TupletBracket and an OttavaBracket .
As the documentation explains, TupletBrackets and OttavaBrackets need to
have the outside-staff-priority property set to false in order to be
printed inside slurs
Hi all,
On Nov 30, 2021, at 2:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> there may be the desire to eventually match labelled
> slurs at more than Voice-level while retaining Voice-level slurs
> locally. However, I have no idea what kind of form this sort of feature
> could take exactly.
Timothy Lanfear writes:
> When slurs overlap, I noticed that I could omit one of the slur
> labels. Can I count on this behaviour or did I just get lucky?
You can count on it. In a manner of speaking, "unlabelled" is a label
of its own. With regard to whether you can count on
When slurs overlap, I noticed that I could omit one of the slur labels.
Can I count on this behaviour or did I just get lucky? Taking the
example from the NR 1.3.2:
\version "2.22.0"
\fixed c' {
2
2
}
--
Timothy Lanfear, Bristol, UK.
Dear Valentin,
Most excellent thank you very much for this!
Adam
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:57 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> hide overrides the specified grobs to be transparent (they will still
> affect
> spacing!)
> One option would be doing something like the appended example, whic
Hi Adam,
hide overrides the specified grobs to be transparent (they will still affect
spacing!)
One option would be doing something like the appended example, which overrides
appoggiatura to tweak the slur to that transparent is #f.
A better way would be the use \omit Slur, which sets Slur.sten
Hi Everyone,
Could someone help me please. Using...
\hide Slur
...I would like to cancel my slur markings yet retain the small slur in my
acciaccatura. On a bit of a deadline and would appreciate any help!
Thank you in advance.
Adam
%%%
\relative c' {
c8 (d e f) g (a b c)
\acciaccatura d8 c
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 1:52 PM Jefferson Felix wrote:
> it's not generating doubleSlurs, but when I remove the pair of numbers
> after \partCombine, doubleSlurs works.
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
I also live in a music tradition with joined-notes hymnals. I use
\partcombine #'(2 . 9)
In you
1 - 100 of 1380 matches
Mail list logo
