Re: lyp

I wrote it in Git. The code probably is in Ruby, but I don't know enough Ruby to fix it at this point anyway. I reported the problem and it is up to the developers now. Thanks again! S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: lyp

Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 15:01 -0700 schrieb Sami Amiris: > > Apart from reporting, it might be worth trying to use exterior > > tools > > to convert the PS to PDF. The system versions might use a > > self-consistent set of binaries and support files, even if all > > they're > > doing is using

Re: lyp

> Apart from reporting, it might be worth trying to use exterior tools > to convert the PS to PDF. The system versions might use a > self-consistent set of binaries and support files, even if all > they're > doing is using ghostscript at some level. You even have a choice of > linux and windows p

Re: lyp

Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 16:25 -0500 schrieb David Wright: > On Tue 17 Mar 2020 at 13:56:20 (-0700), Sami Amiris wrote: > > Well, that was a true surprise there. Yes, the ps file is fine. Its > > conversion to pdf seems to be the problem. Plus, it is all with the > > bravura > > font as I had w

Re: lyp

On Tue 17 Mar 2020 at 13:56:20 (-0700), Sami Amiris wrote: > Well, that was a true surprise there. Yes, the ps file is fine. Its > conversion to pdf seems to be the problem. Plus, it is all with the bravura > font as I had written. That's good news for LilyPond itself. > Thank you for the tip. Ne

Re: lyp

Well, that was a true surprise there. Yes, the ps file is fine. Its conversion to pdf seems to be the problem. Plus, it is all with the bravura font as I had written. Thank you for the tip. Never expected it tbh... Still, what do we do now? Apart from reporting it to the Git hub that is? Thank y

Re: lyp

On Tue 17 Mar 2020 at 07:10:42 (-0700), Sami Amiris wrote: > On Tue 17 Mar 2020 at 13:02:07 (+0100), Francisco Vila wrote: > > El 16/3/20 a las 18:39, Sami Amiris escribió: > > > I installed all packages as well. To my dismay, it did not > > > print at all. > > > > Here you should tell exactly whi

Re: lyp

Thank you very much, will do. Yes, it looks very much like that. Thanks again. -S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: lyp

Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 07:10 -0700 schrieb Sami Amiris: > Hello, and thank you both for your replies. > > Yes, it is the lyp program as described above by Mr. Urs Liska. I > have a > Fedora 31 system and a Windows system as well, but right now I am > using the > Fedora one. I use vim and ca

Re: lyp

Hello, and thank you both for your replies. Yes, it is the lyp program as described above by Mr. Urs Liska. I have a Fedora 31 system and a Windows system as well, but right now I am using the Fedora one. I use vim and call lilypond from the command line - the program gives me the output logs in

Re: lyp

Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2020, 13:02 +0100 schrieb Francisco Vila: > Hello Sami, > > El 16/3/20 a las 18:39, Sami Amiris escribió: > > At first I had a system version, 2.19.84, which ran fine. I > > installed lyp, > > and wanting to take advantage of all the great stuff it allows us > > to have, I >

Re: lyp

Hello Sami, El 16/3/20 a las 18:39, Sami Amiris escribió: At first I had a system version, 2.19.84, which ran fine. I installed lyp, and wanting to take advantage of all the great stuff it allows us to have, I uninstalled my system lilypond and re-installed it in lyp, along the all-new stable ve

Re: lyp version 0.3.3 + new font packages

And of course the link to lyp: http://noteflakes.github.io/lyp/ -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/lyp-version-0-3-3-new-font-packages-tp187735p187736.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

On 28-01-2016 19:52, Sharon Rosner wrote: Hello all, I'd like to announce lyp - a package manager for Lilypond: https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp Great work, Sharon! I'm very excited! ___ lilypond-user mail

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:49:36 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: > But: it was him who actually started to work on this. And without this > we wouldn't even have anything to nitpick about. Exactly. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

Am 29.01.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Sharon Rosner: > Considering the alternatives I think this solution we came up with is > clearly the winner. If you can think of a better one please let me know. One more comment which may help avoid any unnecessary boiling up of discussion: I'm not sure if I 100% a

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

> Version control systems in general are not well-suited for distribution of > software to users. They significantly increase the level of skill and of > previously-installed software a user needs just to get in the door. It's > not a good idea to require a client for a much more complicated prot

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

> With regard to everything else I think nothing speaks against > *extending* lyp to support arbitrary directories as well. lyp already supports installing packages from local files. lyp install mypack:~/mypack-repo This feature can be used also for package development. > The Git > approach i

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

Am 29.01.2016 um 14:43 schrieb msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Sharon Rosner wrote: >>> ...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I >>> tried to give it a fair chance. >> >> Please explain why packages as hosted git repositories is a bad idea. What >> wo

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Sharon Rosner wrote: > >...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I > > tried to give it a fair chance. > > Please explain why packages as hosted git repositories is a bad idea. What > would be a better solution in your opinion? Version control syst

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

> Do you have a contributor's guide yet? The documentation could be improved a lot, but the README includes a section about developing packages: https://github.com/noteflakes/lyp#developing-packages Sharon Rosner -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/lyp-a-

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

> > *have* to contribute - you can also simply make your packages available. > >...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I > tried to give it a fair chance. Please explain why packages as hosted git repositories is a bad idea. What would be a better solution in your op

Re: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:08:53 -0600 (CST) msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > ...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I > tried to give it a fair chance. I read the readme as far as the line > about piping the output of curl into bash. I stopped there. Just replace

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Urs Liska wrote: > I think one of the nice things in Sharon's approach is that you don't > *have* to contribute - you can also simply make your packages available. ...as hosted Git repositories. I thought that was a dealbreaker, but I tried to give it a fair chance. I read t

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

Am 29. Januar 2016 07:09:56 MEZ, schrieb Mike Solomon : >Congratulations!This is a wonderful accomplishment and I am looking >forward to getting some of my packages in good shale and contributing >them. Do you have a contributor's guide yet? I think one of the nice things in Sharon's approach is

RE: lyp - a Package Manager for Lilypond

Congratulations!This is a wonderful accomplishment and I am looking forward to getting some of my packages in good shale and contributing them. Do you have a contributor's guide yet? Cheers,MS Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Sharon Rosner Date: 2