2009/3/11 Robin Bannister :
> Andrew Wilson wrote:
>> Shouldn't this be
>> r2*3/4 \hideNotes d8\glissando \unHideNotes a'8 fs d b
>
> That works too. (Modifying the rest simplifies the beaming.)
>
> A subsequent proposal moved the rest more into the gap: s8 r2*1/2
> \hideNotes a8\glissando \unH
Andrew Wilson wrote:
Shouldn't this be
r2*3/4 \hideNotes d8\glissando \unHideNotes a'8 fs d b
That works too. (Modifying the rest simplifies the beaming.)
A subsequent proposal moved the rest more into the gap:
s8 r2*1/2 \hideNotes a8\glissando \unHideNotes a'8 fs d b
and I suppose the
2009/3/10 Chip :
> r2*1/2 \hideNotes d8\glissando \unHideNotes a'8 fs d b
I don't understand how this works, can someone explain the
timing to me? It looks like you have a minim rest becoming
crotchet rest through the magic of time distortion. You then
add a quaver which by my calcs is 3/8 ths o
Hi Chip,
Thanks for the suggestions, I was sent the following code which
does the job beautifully
Glad to hear you found a relatively easy solution.
Seems a bit overly complicated for adding something so simple don't
ya think?
From that comment, I can see you don't actually appreciate th
Thanks for the suggestions, I was sent the following code which does the
job beautifully -
r2*1/2 \hideNotes d8\glissando \unHideNotes a'8 fs d b
Seems a bit overly complicated for adding something so simple don't ya
think? I'll have to look for some info in the docs on the time
distortion, I h
Mats Bengtsson wrote Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:10 AM
Why not use an invisible grace note to start the glissando? Then,
there's no need to fiddle with the timing:
\transpose c c'{
\grace{ \hideNotes g,8\glissando \unHideNotes} c'4 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\grace{\hideNotes c''8\glissando \unHideNotes}
Why not use an invisible grace note to start the glissando? Then,
there's no need to fiddle with the timing:
\transpose c c'{
\grace{ \hideNotes g,8\glissando \unHideNotes} c'4 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\grace{\hideNotes c''8\glissando \unHideNotes} c'4 c'4 c'4 r4 |
a1\fermata \grace{\hideNotes d'4\glissan
Chip wrote:
Robin Bannister wrote:
Chip wrote:
it just resulted in messed up measures
A judicious use of time distortion may help you here.
\transpose c c'{
\hideNotes g,32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\hideNotes c''32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
a1*3/4\fe
Robin Bannister wrote:
Chip wrote:
it just resulted in messed up measures
A judicious use of time distortion may help you here.
\transpose c c'{
\hideNotes g,32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\hideNotes c''32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
a1*3/4\fermata \hideNo
And this is relevant to the subject? How? Any suggestions on fixing the
real problem I'm having with the glissando?
--
Chip
Here is the fixed version, without the irrelevant <<>> -
-
% LilyPond
\include "english.ly"
\version "2.12.1"
\header{
title = "Te Regalo el Cora
Chip wrote:
Robin Bannister wrote:
Chip wrote:
it just resulted in messed up measures
A judicious use of time distortion may help you here.
\transpose c c'{
\hideNotes g,32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\hideNotes c''32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
a1*3/4\fe
On 3/9/09 9:50 PM, "Chip" wrote:
> \book { \score { << \new Staff = "trumpeta" \with { \remove
> Instrument_name_engraver } \trumpeta >> \header {piece="Trumpet 1"} \layout {
> indent = 0\mm} } }
Why do you use << >> around a single staff? I don't know that it's giving
you any problems, but
Robin Bannister wrote:
Chip wrote:
it just resulted in messed up measures
A judicious use of time distortion may help you here.
\transpose c c'{
\hideNotes g,32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\hideNotes c''32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
a1*3/4\fermata \hideNo
Chip wrote:
it just resulted in messed up measures
A judicious use of time distortion may help you here.
\transpose c c'{
\hideNotes g,32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
\hideNotes c''32\glissando \unHideNotes c'4*7/8 c'4 c'4 r4 |
a1*3/4\fermata \hideNotes d'4\glissando \unHid
14 matches
Mail list logo
