Hi Harm,
On Jan 6, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> The problem is that \displaceHeads uses 'before-line-breaking.
> In case of beamed stems it tries to call the 'stencil before it is calculated.
>
> Changing the property to 'after-line-breaking seems to solve this issue.
>
> Drawback:
Hi Paul,
sorry to answer that late, wasn't online a few days.
2013/1/5 Paul Morris :
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>
>> Without looking into it any further, my best guess is that calculating the
>> stem width does not work because the stem grob has not been generated before
On Jan 4, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
> Without looking into it any further, my best guess is that calculating the
> stem width does not work because the stem grob has not been generated before
> the ] is reached, or something like that?
By commenting things out, I identified the f
On Dec 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> approved as
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>
> I added some small changes.
> Could take them back, if you want.
>
> Many thanks for contributing,
> Harm
Hi Harm, That's great, thanks!
Unfortunately, I ran into a
2012/12/27 Paul Morris :
> Hi Harm,
>
> On Dec 26, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> was a matter of $-signs again.
>> I uploaded a 2.14.2-version with some small changes.
>
> Ah, I should have known. :-) Thanks for making the needed changes.
>
>
>> Ofcourse the description and the
Hi Harm,
On Dec 26, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> was a matter of $-signs again.
> I uploaded a 2.14.2-version with some small changes.
Ah, I should have known. :-) Thanks for making the needed changes.
> Ofcourse the description and the prefatory comments in the code should
>
2012/12/26 Paul Morris :
[...]
> I tried to upload the most recent code to the LSR, with some edits to the
> examples:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=861
>
> But it did not work since it is throwing errors in 2.14.2.
[...]
Hi Paul,
was a matter of $-signs again.
I uploaded a 2.14.2-ve
On Dec 23, 2012, at 1:33 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> that's all true and _much_ better explained than I could have done it.
> I agree to all of it.
Hi Harm, ok, thanks.
> Thanks.
> And I promise to approve it asap.
I tried to upload the most recent code to the LSR, with some edits to the
ex
On Dec 20, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> I think there is no way to align moved noteheads left and right from
> the stem _and_ to keep a correct 'stem-attachment in x-axis-direction
> in all thinkable cases.
> The y-value of 'stem-attachment has to be modified in several situations
>
2012/12/23 Paul Morris :
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> I think there is no way to align moved noteheads left and right from
>> the stem _and_ to keep a correct 'stem-attachment in x-axis-direction
>> in all thinkable cases.
>> The y-value of 'stem-attachment has to be
On Dec 20, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> We should provide a shorter example than my last.
> I used the custom-note-heads only for advanced testings.
> I'd prefer a double-line, though, above the original, below the tweaked
> version.
Sounds good to me. I can work on that.
> (2)
Thomas Morley writes:
> (2) LilyPond
> So far so good and LilyPond _does_ it quite good.
> Though, the amount of covering the stem-width isn't the same for left
> and right printed noteheads.
> For up-stems a left-printed notehead covers the whole stem-width but a
> right-printed one only about t
2012/12/20 Paul Morris :
[...]
> I started work on editing it for the LSR (see attachment). Having the
> comments explaining the steps is really nice. I thought it would probably be
> good to comment out the test section and the music examples that go with it
> to keep things focused and simpl
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> I had a closer look at this snippet.
> Attached you'll find my version of it.
Hi Harm,
I had a chance to take a closer look at your improved version of this snippet.
Very nice work, thank you! The changes and additions all make sense to me
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/12/15 Paul Morris :
> [...]
>> Looks like the most recent version of the snippet is now appearing in the
>> LSR:
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=861
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I had a closer look at this snippet.
> Attached you'll find
2012/12/15 Paul Morris :
[...]
> Looks like the most recent version of the snippet is now appearing in the LSR:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=861
Hi Paul,
I had a closer look at this snippet.
Attached you'll find my version of it.
Changes:
- reads the stencil-dimensions of the NoteHe
2012/12/15 Paul Morris :
[...]
> Anyone know why there is so much unnecessary white-space?
Something is wrong in the LSR.
I already reported this to the LSR-Admin.
He promised to have a look asap.
Cheers,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:07 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:30 PM, David Nalesnik
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I notice that you haven't added the $ sign before offsets in the LSR
>>> snippet as Harm and I advised. Try that and I see no reason the
>>> snipp
Hi David,
On Dec 13, 2012, at 10:36 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:30 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Somehow your response has gotten associated with the wrong thread.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>>
>>> I cam
2012/12/13 Paul Morris :
[...]
> I found a good way to break it. If you try it with whole notes the stem's
> X-extent is (+inf.0 . -inf.0) and you get this error: "programming error:
> Infinity or NaN encountered"
Likely, a check for
grob::is-live?
should be helpful.
>
> So I tried to work aro
Hi Harm,
On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> I've seen the updated version in the LSR already and tend to approve it as is.
> I doubt it could be possible to create an automatism for 'stem-attachment.
Ok, I went ahead and added examples of manual overrides for fixing stem
atta
Hi David (N), Paul,
2012/12/13 Paul Morris :
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> I had a look at the LSR-snippet
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>>
>> It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
>> before offsets in the music-
On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I had a look at the LSR-snippet
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>
> It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
> before offsets in the music-function.
>
> But you will have noticed that after appl
Hi Harm,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2012/12/11 Paul Morris :
>> Below is a revised version
> [...]
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I had a look at the LSR-snippet
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
>
> It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
> before
2012/12/11 Paul Morris :
> Below is a revised version
[...]
Hi Paul,
I had a look at the LSR-snippet
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
It's no problem to make it work with 2.14.2 just adding a $-sign
before offsets in the music-function.
But you will have noticed that after applying the f
Arle Lommel writes:
> Great Paul! Thanks for this. I wish I knew Scheme enough to do this
> myself, but I've not learned it and for someone who doesn't know
> Scheme, it looks really strange and the learning curve looks steep.
Scheme is not all that hard to learn, but some kind of tricks you can
Great Paul! Thanks for this. I wish I knew Scheme enough to do this myself, but
I've not learned it and for someone who doesn't know Scheme, it looks really
strange and the learning curve looks steep.
Best,
-Arle
On 2012 Dec 11, at 22:00 , Paul Morris wrote:
> Hi Arle,
>
> Below is a rev
Hi Arle,
Below is a revised version that lets you just enter 1 and -1 to indicate your
offsets. It then multiplies that by 1.251178 to get the precise offset amount.
You could enter a slightly larger amount (like 1.1) for whole notes and adjust
to taste. This basically lets you work in unit
Brilliant, Paul. It isn't as easy as I'd hoped, but this works and is really
minimally difficult for me to use. I used 1.25 and -1.25 as values and it is
certainly close enough that I can't complain. This helps a *lot*.
Best regards,
Arle
On 2012 Dec 11, at 21:05 , Paul Morris wrote:
> Hi Arl
29 matches
Mail list logo
