>> I'm left-handed by myself (but playing the piano), and I don't feel
>> offended 🙂
>
> But aren't you playing a right-handed piano?
I do. However, I'm not *completely* left-handed – AFAIK, completely
left-handed people are quite rare. For example, while I write with my
left hand or hold a sp
On 12/13/2024 12:38 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Yes. Also, I guess not as many left-handed players are upset about
this as I thought.
I'm left-handed by myself (but playing the piano), and I don't feel
offended 🙂
But aren't you playing a right-handed piano?
(My guitar instructor uses that as ev
> *If* we had a page that showed all grob properties, then we could do
> that.
My bad, we actually have that :-) So yes, your suggestion is sound,
and the list of grob properties could be amended accordingly.
Werner
>>> There's a problem there, too, in that the default value depends on
>>> the grob.
>>>
>>> In MeasureSpanner, the default value is (staff-bar . staff-bar)
>>>
>>> In PercentRepeat, it's (break-alignment . staff-bar)
>>
>> I don't see a problem here.
>
> You can't talk about *the* default value,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 4:05 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Christopher Heckman writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:58 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>
> >> >> IIRC, a suggestion in the mentioned thread is to make the property
> >> >> description displayed for a given grob show which interfaces i
Christopher Heckman writes:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:58 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>> >> IIRC, a suggestion in the mentioned thread is to make the property
>> >> description displayed for a given grob show which interfaces it is
>> >> part of, for example
>> >>
>> >> ```
>> >> ‘spacing-pair
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:58 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> IIRC, a suggestion in the mentioned thread is to make the property
> >> description displayed for a given grob show which interfaces it is
> >> part of, for example
> >>
> >> ```
> >> ‘spacing-pair’ (pair)
> >> interface(s):
> >>
> I mean should MMRs actually use centered-spanner-interface? MMRs are
> after all spanners that are centered between spacing-pair. It looks
> to me like the C++ code for MMRs does exactly the same offset
> calculation as centered-spanner-interface::calc-x-offset, though not
> all in one place.
>> Exactly this is not possible, because there exists only a single,
>> global property called `spacing-pair`, which consequently has a
>> single, global description.
>>
>> In other words, the auto-generated documentation sees that an
>> interface uses `spacing-pair`, and it shows its description.
>> IIRC, a suggestion in the mentioned thread
>
> Do you know the name of that thread? I tried searching for it, but
> couldn't come up with anything.
It's mentioned at the top of
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6210
namely
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 9:38 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> The policy of LilyPond is to avoid different property names for
> >> similar functionality, which often leads to cryptic property
> >> descriptions to be as generic as possible. In this particular case
> >> an example is given, which is
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 9:38 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> The policy of LilyPond is to avoid different property names for
> >> similar functionality, which often leads to cryptic property
> >> descriptions to be as generic as possible. In this particular case
> >> an example is given, which is
I mean should MMRs actually use centered-spanner-interface? MMRs are after
all spanners that are centered between spacing-pair. It looks to me like
the C++ code for MMRs does exactly the same offset calculation
as centered-spanner-interface::calc-x-offset, though not all in one place.
On Tue, Dec
>> The policy of LilyPond is to avoid different property names for
>> similar functionality, which often leads to cryptic property
>> descriptions to be as generic as possible. In this particular case
>> an example is given, which is actually a good thing, but it doesn't
>> cover the `centered-sp
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:58 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > I went through the interfaces pages recently, and I found a couple of
> > things that need to be fixed (these is from the 2.25 version).
> >
> > (1) The centered-spanner-interface page talks about using it with
> > MultiMeasureRest,
> I went through the interfaces pages recently, and I found a couple of
> things that need to be fixed (these is from the 2.25 version).
>
> (1) The centered-spanner-interface page talks about using it with
> MultiMeasureRest, but MultiMeasureRest isn't among the list of
> grobs at the b
16 matches
Mail list logo
