Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-26 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen writes: > On 1/26/10 1:41 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > >> Carl Sorensen writes: >> >>> On 1/24/10 7:42 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: You can use an inline attachment for that, like this: >>> >>> This is even worse for those of us who use digests. The email is >>>

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-26 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/26/10 1:41 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > Carl Sorensen writes: > >> On 1/24/10 7:42 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: >>> >>> You can use an inline attachment for that, like this: >>> >> >> This is even worse for those of us who use digests. The email is >> split up into one email plus two

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-26 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen writes: > On 1/24/10 7:42 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: >> >> You can use an inline attachment for that, like this: >> > > This is even worse for those of us who use digests. The email is > split up into one email plus two attachments, so we never see the end > of the email. > > I'

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-25 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/24/10 7:42 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:39:51AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilypond file, so that > people Well, IMO, it's better to have a short file in the bod

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-24 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:39:51AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> > > IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilypond file, so that >> > > people >> > >> > Well, IMO, it's better to have a short file in the body of the email. >> > Because that way I can look a

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:39:51AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilypond file, so that > > > people > > > > Well, IMO, it's better to have a short file in the body of the email. > > Because that way I can look at it and identify errors without

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Trevor Daniels
Gilles Sadowski wrote Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:39 PM >>> Gilles asked for an attachment I don't exactly know what to >>> attach so >>> I've attached the latest pdf output. >> >> What was wanted was the exact working code to get bad output, >> which you've >> included in the body of the

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > >>> Gilles asked for an attachment I don't exactly know what to attach so > >>> I've attached the latest pdf output. > >> > >> What was wanted was the exact working code to get bad output, which you've > >> included in the body of the email. Perfect! > > > > IMHO, perfect would be to *att

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/23/10 7:07 AM, "Gilles Sadowski" wrote: > Hi. > >>> Gilles asked for an attachment I don't exactly know what to attach so >>> I've attached the latest pdf output. >> >> What was wanted was the exact working code to get bad output, which you've >> included in the body of the email. Perf

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Jay, > So could a snippet be created from this simple(r) example with that > instruction? What exactly is wrong with the [very simple] example in the docs? What could you not figure out by looking at that coe, or by

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Jay Hamilton
This is what I was looking for. So could a snippet be created from this simple(r) example with that instruction? The current example of nested slurs with the schenker example is way too complex for my (and maybe others?) poor brain. Thanks to everyone for your help. Jay On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > > Gilles asked for an attachment I don't exactly know what to attach so > > I've attached the latest pdf output. > > What was wanted was the exact working code to get bad output, which you've > included in the body of the email. Perfect! IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilyp

Re: RE; Re nesting curves getting closer

2010-01-23 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/23/10 6:39 AM, "i...@soundand.com" wrote: > > > Gilles asked for an attachment I don't exactly know what to attach so > I've attached the latest pdf output. What was wanted was the exact working code to get bad output, which you've included in the body of the email. Perfect! > > This