On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:39:51AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilypond file, so that > > > people > > > > Well, IMO, it's better to have a short file in the body of the email. > > Because that way I can look at it and identify errors without having to save > > an attachment and then open it up in another application. > > I don't *have* to save to attachment to just view it.
That's nice. But like Carl, I find it easier to look at the file in the body of an email. Granted, it depends if it's a minimal example or not. If it is, then it'll only be 5 lines long or so. If it's longer, I won't look at it anyway, so it's a moot point. > I said that it's > easier (if the purpose is to compile it) to just save it than to cut/copy > the relevant bits from the body of the mail. That's nice. I find it easier to copy&paste. > [If you cannot view attached text files inline, I guess that it's a > shortcoming of the mail client you use...] That's nice. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
