In the mean time I have found out more about relative, allthough I'm
not quite sure.
E.g.
If in relative I write: a b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b c d e f g, I get
the second a one octave higher then the first, the third an other octave
higher then the second
So, I do have some things to
Hi Kees!
Kees Serier schrieb:
I'm having trouble with: \relative c'
I have put \relative on several places in the source, but I get a very
strange output in the PDF.
What am I doing wrong?
You only have to remove every comma/apostrophe from the input for Staff#2.
For example:
a' b' c'' d'' e'
Quoting dax2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You could stick with absolute notation which is much easier to read
when things get rough, and in my opinion more correct for e.g. a score.
Who, today, would like to read a score with "Corni in F"? If they could
avoid it. Now they can.
Don't talk nonsense, \re
Kees Serier schreef:
Hi,
I'm having trouble with: \relative c'
Thanks to Thies and Martial, and possibly others who replied (postings
here are ver slowww, gmane.test is very fast).
The hole point is that as the manual says, every note is relative to the
previous one, so if I write:
a
On 1/30/06, Kees Serier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble with: \relative c'
> I have put \relative on several places in the source, but I get a very
> strange output in the PDF.
> What am I doing wrong?
if you're using relative you don't need the pitch suffixes ("," and "
'
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:43:44 +0100
Kees wrote:
>
> In the mean time I have found out more about relative, allthough I'm
> not quite sure.
>
> E.g.
>
> If in relative I write: a b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b c d e f g, I get
> the second a one octave higher then the first, the third an other oc
remove the ' after the first note
in the second score
\new Staff {
% \relative c' {
\time 4/4
\clef treble
\key c \major
% \relative c' {
a,8 b c d e f g
a b c d e f g
a b c d e f g
% a'' b'' c''' d''' e''' f''' g'''
}
___
