On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:43:44 +0100
Kees wrote:

> 
> In the mean time I have found out more about relative, allthough I'm 
> not quite sure.
> 
> E.g.
> 
> If in relative I write: a b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b c d e f g, I get
> the second a one octave higher then the first, the third an other octave 
>   higher then the second....
> 
> So, I do have some things to figure out.
> 
> Kees

You could stick with absolute notation which is much easier to read
when things get rough, and in my opinion more correct for e.g. a score.

Who, today, would like to read a score with "Corni in F"? If they could
avoid it. Now they can.


/Donald
-- 
dax2-tele2adsl:dk -- http://d-axel.dk/  Donald Axel


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to