On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:43:44 +0100 Kees wrote: > > In the mean time I have found out more about relative, allthough I'm > not quite sure. > > E.g. > > If in relative I write: a b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b c d e f g, I get > the second a one octave higher then the first, the third an other octave > higher then the second.... > > So, I do have some things to figure out. > > Kees
You could stick with absolute notation which is much easier to read when things get rough, and in my opinion more correct for e.g. a score. Who, today, would like to read a score with "Corni in F"? If they could avoid it. Now they can. /Donald -- dax2-tele2adsl:dk -- http://d-axel.dk/ Donald Axel _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
