I made such syntax file based on JEdit LilyPond syntax file and JEdit
screenshots from LilyPond site.
You can download it here: http://marsoft.dyndns.info/userDefineLang_LilyPond.xml
It is not complete of course, and is worse than JEdit's one, but it is working.
--
Best Regards, MarSoft (Семён М
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
>
> Many of those words are from bagpipe.ly and related
> non-automatically-included files. I'm not certain they *should*
> be included in that list.
>
> There are some properties that probably should be included, but
> I'd caution anybody to check that those propertie
Many of those words are from bagpipe.ly and related
non-automatically-included files. I'm not certain they *should*
be included in that list.
There are some properties that probably should be included, but
I'd caution anybody to check that those properties really aren't
included in the most lates
Copied to the bug mailing list, since it seems that the generated
lilypond-words files are not complete.
-Eluze wrote:
i searched with a simple regex in C:\Program
Files\lilypond\usr\share\lilypond for definitions and found over 200 missing
terms - i hope they have been added since the
On 20.08.2009, at 23:11, -Eluze wrote:
-Eluze wrote:
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote:
A useful starting point should be the Emacs and Vim modes
included in
the LilyPond distribution.
Among others, they contain an automatically generated list of
predefined
commands and reserved words in the
-Eluze wrote:
>
>
> Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote:
>>
>> A useful starting point should be the Emacs and Vim modes included in
>> the LilyPond distribution.
>> Among others, they contain an automatically generated list of predefined
>> commands and reserved words in the LilyPond syntax, see
>> .../
Mats Bengtsson-4 wrote:
>
> A useful starting point should be the Emacs and Vim modes included in
> the LilyPond distribution.
> Among others, they contain an automatically generated list of predefined
> commands and reserved words in the LilyPond syntax, see
> .../usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/li
A useful starting point should be the Emacs and Vim modes included in
the LilyPond distribution.
Among others, they contain an automatically generated list of predefined
commands and reserved words in the LilyPond syntax, see
.../usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/lilypond-words.el
and
.../usr/share/lily
Ah, I understand. nano loads a config file when it starts, so if a
file's extension matches any of the ones defined in the config file,
it then loads the appropriate syntax.
As to what I decided to hilight. That was a completely personal
issue, and since it was my first (and only) attempt a
James E. Bailey-3 wrote:
>
> No searching, or maybe I misunderstand what you mean.
>
i guess you had to apply this regex to a file or files - were these all
lilypond (program-) files or did you go thru the docs or what?
an additional question of course is, if you found *all* lilypond
express
I looked in the nano documentation on how to create a syntax
definition. It said that it was all regex. Then I went to wikipedia
and read how to do regex. That's it really. No searching, or maybe I
misunderstand what you mean.
On 19.08.2009, at 01:25, -Eluze wrote:
James E. Bailey-3 wro
James E. Bailey-3 wrote:
>
> I don't know what it requires, but it may be easier than you think. I
> know that with (no previous experience with regex or syntax
> hilighting), a couple of hours and the wikipedia page on regex, I was
> able to create one for nano.
>
>
interesting - can yo
I don't know what it requires, but it may be easier than you think. I
know that with (no previous experience with regex or syntax
hilighting), a couple of hours and the wikipedia page on regex, I was
able to create one for nano.
On 16.08.2009, at 16:30, CGY wrote:
Hello,
do we have a do
Hello,
do we have a document a files to be able to hightlight lilypond syntax for
notepad++ ?
thank for your help
Regards
CGY
Bugzilla from tvalu...@seznam.cz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> is there a lilypond language definition available for Notepad++ 4.7,
> which supports user language definit
> is there a lilypond language definition available for Notepad++ 4.7, which
> supports user language definitions?
Hello, I also use Notepad++, just use the TeX language definition. To
use it as default when opening a new file go to
Configuration->Configure Styles, search for TeX and add ly as
ailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Palmer, Ralph
> Sent: 22 January 2008 14:28
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Lilypond language definition for Notepad++
>
>
> Greetings -
>
> I've been using ConText fo
Greetings -
I've been using ConText for editing my LilyPond files. I'm running
LilyPond 2.11.23 under Windows XP SP2. I tried using jEdit with LPTool
for awhile, but the load time was so long, that I gave up. I didn't see
any great advantage to jEdit at that time (about a year ago?), and
ConText d
2008/1/21, NJW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anyway, who would have the time to do that. ;-) (Rhetorical: I know you
> did, but only for Windows ...)
Yes. I'm learning wxWidgets to make it fully cross-platform in a distant future.
2008/1/21, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am quite confused.
David Fedoruk írta:
I have never been able to get all the features of LilyPondTool to work
in jEdit. The advanced render and open as PDF has rarely if ever
worked for me.
So this is what disappoints me most :-) I would be happier and see more
use of my work if you didn't have problems. Could
I have never been able to get all the features of LilyPondTool to work
in jEdit. The advanced render and open as PDF has rarely if ever
worked for me.
I render from a bash or zsh shell and open it manually from the
Finder. It may be a bit awkward and not how it was designed to work,
but even so, j
On Jan 21, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/1/21, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If I didn't use Java it would not exist at all, and certainly I would
not have users from Linux, Mac and Windows world. So we must
accept this
trade-off: I don't like Java, bu
Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> Another cool thing could be to develop a bundled Lily+jEdit+LPT
> pre-configured easy installer :)
Fully cross-platform? :^)
Anyway, who would have the time to do that. ;-) (Rhetorical: I know you
did, but only for Windows ...)
--
Nick.
--
View this message in
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
> And don't get this as an offense. My question was really curiosity.
> ...
> So I want to make it a product that everyone uses for LilyPond.
No offence taken. It has been a very frustrating time, just to get a half
working LilyPondTool and jEdit. I know
2008/1/21, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If I didn't use Java it would not exist at all, and certainly I would
> not have users from Linux, Mac and Windows world. So we must accept this
> trade-off: I don't like Java, but it is the platform which provides the most
> features
But there is no LilyPondTool in NotePad++, so it is not fair to say
"hey, LilyPondTool is buggy, so I use notepad++ ".
My question was regarding this. JEdit supports LilyPond syntax highlight
out of the box since the end of 2004.
Also, even if you have problems with LilyPondTool, ie. you can't us
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
> I'm always curious why people spend a lot of time to create something
> for an editor that has been supported out of the box in jEdit for more
> than 3 years now.
Well, it's bad enough trying to learn LilyPond, without struggling against
jEdit, too. Ev
2008/1/19, Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> May I ask why you don't use JEdit with (or without) LilyPondTool?
> (http://lilypondtool.organum.hu)
> I'm always curious why people spend a lot of time to create something
> for an editor that has been supported out of the box in jEdit for more
> th
May I ask why you don't use JEdit with (or without) LilyPondTool?
(http://lilypondtool.organum.hu)
I'm always curious why people spend a lot of time to create something
for an editor that has been supported out of the box in jEdit for more
than 3 years now.
Bert
Tomas Valusek írta:
Hello,
t
Hello,
thanks for showing me that thread. I read only mails with a subject that
gets my attention in any way, and the subject Lilypond API wasn't one i
would consider interesting for me nor be related to Notepad++. So this
is just another reminder there are people using Notepad++ and some day
2008/1/19, Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> is there a lilypond language definition available for Notepad++ 4.7,
> which supports user language definitions? Thank you.
You might be interested in reading the whole conversation on
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-1
30 matches
Mail list logo
