Graham Percival-3 wrote: > > Many of those words are from bagpipe.ly and related > non-automatically-included files. I'm not certain they *should* > be included in that list. > > There are some properties that probably should be included, but > I'd caution anybody to check that those properties really aren't > included in the most latest (generated from git) list. > > i'm not a great connoisseur of bagpipe music but i'd rather suggest to add these definitions to make the use of lilypond easier for bagpipers, too!
then i wondered why most of the grobs - as listed with the *all-grob-descriptions* function - are not in the lilypond-words file!? see atached file http://www.nabble.com/file/p25086863/missing%2Bin%2Blilypond-words%2Bcompared%2Bwith%2Bly%2Blist-all-grobs.ly missing+in+lilypond-words+compared+with+ly+list-all-grobs.ly for missing grobs sorry to grouch! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-language-definition-for-Notepad%2B%2B-tp14969868p25086863.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
