[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > IIRC, fontforge can be buikt without X so that it essentially works
> ^
> Ha, this almost looks like Dutch :-)
Yes, every time I use fontforge, I want to "belly" it. :-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www
> IIRC, fontforge can be buikt without X so that it essentially works
^
Ha, this almost looks like Dutch :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-u
> Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
IIRC, fontforge can be buikt without X so that it essentially works in
script mode only.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Hi,
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi,
Am 01.02.2005 um 22:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X1
Hi,
Am 01.02.2005 um 22:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from t
Am 01.02.2005 um 22:43 schrieb Chuck Boody:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Equally mysterious is the fact that my system is NOT using the tsch
shell even though OS 10.3.x is supposed to be using it.
As of 10.3 MacOSX uses bash as default shell. (10.0 - 10.2.x used
tcsh)
My ter
Thanks again,
See comments
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source
commu
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Equally mysterious is the fact that my system is NOT using the tsch
shell even though OS 10.3.x is supposed to be using it.
As of 10.3 MacOSX uses bash as default shell. (10.0 - 10.2.x used tcsh)
My terminal preferences are set to default. My ter
Am 01.02.2005 um 21:51 schrieb Chuck Boody:
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source
community."
Did you install the "X11 for Mac OS X SDK" package too? It's an
optio
Thanks Christian,
See below:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11:
"XFree86 4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source
community."
Did you install the "X11
Hi Chuck,
Am 01.02.2005 um 18:34 schrieb Chuck Boody:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11: "XFree86
4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source community."
Did you install the "X11 for Mac OS X SDK" package too? It's an option
when installing the Developer Too
Thanks Christ,
But still no success...
Two interesting things:
1) The Apple website says this about things included in X11: "XFree86
4.3 — Includes latest enhancements from the Open Source community."
2) My error message still says: "Failed: Can't resolve dependency
"gcc3.1" for package "xfree8
Thanks for this info.
I've installed X11 and continue to get the same error message. I've no
idea what is going on...
Chuck Boody
On Feb 1, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
Hmm indeed. But we do not use the
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> > Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
>
> Hmm indeed. But we do not use the GUI. I wonder why fontforge needs
> to load the X libraries in batch mode.
>
> Jan.
(This is x86 and debian)
$ apt-get source fontforge
$ cd fontforge-0.0.200
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Also, X is necessary for building, since we use fontforge.
Hmm indeed. But we do not use the GUI. I wonder why fontforge needs
to load the X libraries in batch mode.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Christ van Willegen writes:
>
> > What's weird is that a dependence of Lilypond appears to be xfree86!
> > Lilypond
> > 2.4 is a command line program, so it doesn't use X...
>
> That is not so weird, even Debian does have that.
>
> > Perhaps another tool requires X t
Christ van Willegen writes:
> What's weird is that a dependence of Lilypond appears to be xfree86! Lilypond
> 2.4 is a command line program, so it doesn't use X...
That is not so weird, even Debian does have that.
> Perhaps another tool requires X to work.
ghostscript and metafont are the obvio
Hi Chuck, list,
> Exactly the same problem happens. I've never installed the complete
> developer tools on the Mac. Could this be the problem??
As far as I can tell, the XCode Tools together with the gcc update ought to
be enough...
What's weird is that a dependence of Lilypond appears to be x
Thanks but...
Exactly the same problem happens. I've never installed the complete
developer tools on the Mac. Could this be the problem??
Chuck Boody
On Jan 30, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Christ van Willegen wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3
updater. Ran
Hi Chuck,
> Running Mac OX 10.3.7. Installed XCode Tools 1.5 and the gcc 3.3
> updater. Ran selfupdate-cvs. No porblems to here. Ran "fink install
> lilypond-unstable" Responded defaults to the questions. I get this
> error:
What happens if you do this:
fink selfupdate
fink install lilypon
On 1/27/04 12:18 PM, "Stan Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, at 01:49 PM, David Rogers wrote:
>
>> I do know that updating via rsync is preferred over updating via cvs -
>> but that also forces you to use the whole "unstable" tree, which may be
>>
>
> As men
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, at 01:49 PM, David Rogers wrote:
I do know that updating via rsync is preferred over updating via cvs -
but that also forces you to use the whole "unstable" tree, which may be
As mentioned previously, I believe (unless Walter is running OS 10.3)
that the db42-shlibs
On 2004/01/27, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>I successfully executed the "fink reinstall fink" command from the
>terminal but when I tried the "selfupdate" command, I got the
following:
>
>/usr/bin/su walterhofmeister -c 'cvs -z3 update -d -P'
>*** malloc: vm_allocate(size=1342177280) failed with 3
>
>
> Try the following:
>
>
> open a new Terminal window and type:
> fink reinstall fink
>
> (and press Return, of course)
> When that finishes, open FinkCommander, go to the Source menu and choose
> Selfupdate. After that, choose Update-all from the same menu.
>
> Hopefully then the correct pa
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 04:02 PM, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink (.17.10and
got the
warning:
WARNING: While resolving dependency "db42-shlibs" for package
"lilypond-unstable-2.1.10-1", package "db42-shlibs" was not found.
Failed: Can't r
On 2004/01/26, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>On 1/26/04 3:12 PM, "David Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2004/01/26, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>>
>>> I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink...
>>
>> Are you using FinkCommander, or working in the Terminal?
>>
>> (Either way
On 1/26/04 3:12 PM, "David Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004/01/26, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
>
>> I have just tried to install version 2.1.10-1 under Fink...
>
> Are you using FinkCommander, or working in the Terminal?
>
> (Either way is good, just finding out how to help you.)
>
>
Installation of Lilypond on Cygwin:
Download setup.exe. (http://cygwin.com/setup.exe)
Run it.
Click Next
Select Install from Internet. Click next.
Use the Default setting for Root directory (c:\cygwin), Install for (All
users), Default Text File Type (Unix). Click Next.
Local Package Directory - L
28 matches
Mail list logo
