Well, "easy-to-use" and "many features" are conflicting with each other
:-) JEdit and LilyPondTool tends to be on the "many features" side. I
can admit. Shortcuts are supported in a very general way.
However, if one needs autocompletion, because he cannot remember all the
properties of a grob, o
Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:
Oh please...
Emacs has menus.
Emacs has windows-like keyboard shortcuts if you like.
You can delete a character with backspace.
You can compile a LilyPond file, see the PDF score or play the midi
file with shortcuts (or via the menus) without leaving the source code.
Tha
Bertalan Fodor schrieb:
I don't want to be too confident, but as far as I know, the editor with
the most features is jEdit with its LilyPondTool plugin. :-) I don't
what the definition of an IDE is, but the most complete one is
LilyPondTool for sure.
I feel the automatic completion and documen
Uli Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...] Emacs has many own commands and very less commands who are
> windows-conform. All this specific commands you have to drill in your
> head, there is no graphical menü (when I am right). [...]
> There you read that you cannot delete a written characte
>> I am blind or utf-8 is not supported
> Context supports UTF8, see it's homepage:
> http://context.cx/content/view/18/41/
Thanks
but I don't see where I can save the file in utf-8.
Either not accent or not compiled when I convert in unicode !
It is not important for me, I use now Crimson Edi
I don't want to be too confident, but as far as I know, the editor with
the most features is jEdit with its LilyPondTool plugin. :-) I don't
what the definition of an IDE is, but the most complete one is
LilyPondTool for sure.
I feel the automatic completion and document wizard a must for begin
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 06:27:38PM +, Brian Haddon wrote:
> martial cathemline.org> writes:
>
> >
> > > > I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated
> > > > editors emacs and vim.
> >
> > I am blind or utf-8 is not supported
> >
> > http://forum.context.cx/index.php?
martial cathemline.org> writes:
>
> > > I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated
> > > editors emacs and vim.
>
> I am blind or utf-8 is not supported
>
> http://forum.context.cx/index.php?topic=678.0
>
Though (relatively) new to LilyPond, I have used ConTEXT for som
Hello Jan,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb:
> Have you actually tried a recent version of Emacs lately? What things
> do you find complicated?
No, I haven't tried any version of Emacs. But I read about it. Emacs may
be a powerful editor of course, but when you start first with it, you
have to study
> > I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated
> > editors emacs and vim.
I am blind or utf-8 is not supported :-(
http://forum.context.cx/index.php?topic=678.0
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://list
Uli Heller writes:
> I found a wonderful editor to write and performe Lilypond in
> Windows-Systems. He is called Context and can be found at:
>http://www.context.cx/
That's great.
> I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated
> editors emacs and vim.
Have you actually t
11 matches
Mail list logo
